Skip to main content
added 51 characters in body
Source Link
sds
  • 27k
  • 2
  • 90
  • 143

General Division of Responsibilities

The division of responsibilities was roughly similar to that at the national level: the decisions were made at the party committee (and both Soviet chairman and executive committee chairman were members thereof, together with the police and KGB bosses) under the guidance of the secretary, and the Soviet chairman was responsible for getting the Soviet to rubber stamp the decisions and the executive was responsible for, you guessed it, executing the decisions.

Ethnic Regions

The 1st Party secretary was the supreme boss in the Russian and Ukrainian regions (oblast/krai). In the ethnic regions, the 1st secretary was "the local", representing the ethnic/tribal elites, and the 2nd secretary was a Russian (or, rarely, Ukrainian or even Belorussian) sent in from the Center, and it was the 2nd secretary who (unofficially!) held the supreme power (becausebut not the official prestige and visibility!), because the power in the USSR flowed from Moscow to regional centers, and from those to local centers &c).

The only exception I can recall was Kolbin whose appointment as the 1st Secretary in Kazakhstan in December 1986 lead to riots.

The possible exceptions in the other direction were Aliyev (who had KGB roots and thus did not need a Moscow baby-sitter) and Kunaev who was a personal ally of Brezhnev.

Post-USSR (response to a comment)

When the USSR collapsed in 1991, the 2nd secretaries lost their power source - Moscow was no longer to be reckoned with - and the 1st secretaries landed with all the central power there was.

SourceSource: I lived there and observed the politics first hand.

General Division of Responsibilities

The division of responsibilities was roughly similar to that at the national level: the decisions were made at the party committee (and both Soviet chairman and executive committee chairman were members thereof, together with the police and KGB bosses) under the guidance of the secretary, and the Soviet chairman was responsible for getting the Soviet to rubber stamp the decisions and the executive was responsible for, you guessed it, executing the decisions.

Ethnic Regions

The 1st Party secretary was the supreme boss in the Russian and Ukrainian regions (oblast/krai). In the ethnic regions, the 1st secretary was "the local", representing the ethnic/tribal elites, and the 2nd secretary was a Russian (or, rarely, Ukrainian or even Belorussian) sent in from the Center, and it was the 2nd secretary who (unofficially) held the supreme power (because the power in the USSR flowed from Moscow to regional centers, and from those to local centers &c).

The only exception I can recall was Kolbin whose appointment as the 1st Secretary in Kazakhstan in December 1986 lead to riots.

The possible exceptions in the other direction were Aliyev (who had KGB roots and thus did not need a Moscow baby-sitter) and Kunaev who was a personal ally of Brezhnev.

Post-USSR (response to a comment)

When the USSR collapsed in 1991, the 2nd secretaries lost their power source - Moscow was no longer to be reckoned with - and the 1st secretaries landed with all the central power there was.

Source: I lived there and observed the politics first hand.

General Division of Responsibilities

The division of responsibilities was roughly similar to that at the national level: the decisions were made at the party committee (and both Soviet chairman and executive committee chairman were members thereof, together with the police and KGB bosses) under the guidance of the secretary, and the Soviet chairman was responsible for getting the Soviet to rubber stamp the decisions and the executive was responsible for, you guessed it, executing the decisions.

Ethnic Regions

The 1st Party secretary was the supreme boss in the Russian and Ukrainian regions (oblast/krai). In the ethnic regions, the 1st secretary was "the local", representing the ethnic/tribal elites, and the 2nd secretary was a Russian (or, rarely, Ukrainian or even Belorussian) sent in from the Center, and it was the 2nd secretary who (unofficially!) held the supreme power (but not the official prestige and visibility!), because the power in the USSR flowed from Moscow to regional centers, and from those to local centers &c.

The only exception I can recall was Kolbin whose appointment as the 1st Secretary in Kazakhstan in December 1986 lead to riots.

The possible exceptions in the other direction were Aliyev (who had KGB roots and thus did not need a Moscow baby-sitter) and Kunaev who was a personal ally of Brezhnev.

Post-USSR (response to a comment)

When the USSR collapsed in 1991, the 2nd secretaries lost their power source - Moscow was no longer to be reckoned with - and the 1st secretaries landed with all the central power there was.

Source: I lived there and observed the politics first hand.

rearranged
Source Link
sds
  • 27k
  • 2
  • 90
  • 143

General Division of Responsibilities

The division of responsibilities was roughly similar to that at the national level: the decisions were made at the party committee (and both Soviet chairman and executive committee chairman were members thereof, together with the police and KGB bosses) under the guidance of the secretary, and the Soviet chairman was responsible for getting the Soviet to rubber stamp the decisions and the executive was responsible for, you guessed it, executing the decisions.

Ethnic Regions

The 1st Party secretary was the supreme boss isin the Russian and Ukrainian regions (oblast/krai). In the ethnic regions, the 1st secretary was "the local", representing the ethnic/tribal elites, and the 2nd secretary was a Russian (or, rarely, Ukrainian or even Belorussian) sent in from the Center, and it was the 2nd secretary who (unofficially) held the actualsupreme power (because the power in the USSR flowed from Moscow to regional centers, and from those to local centers &c). 

The only exception I can recall was Kolbin whose appointment as the 1st Secretary in Kazakhstan in December 1986 lead to riots.

That said, the division of responsibilities was roughly similar to that at the national level:The possible exceptions in the decisionsother direction were made at the party committee Aliyev (and both Soviet chairmanwho had KGB roots and executive committee chairman were members thereofthus did not need a Moscow baby-sitter) under the guidanceand Kunaev who was a personal ally of Brezhnev.

Post-USSR (response to a comment)

When the secretaryUSSR collapsed in 1991, and the Soviet chairman2nd secretaries lost their power source - Moscow was responsible for getting the Sovietno longer to rubber stamp the decisionsbe reckoned with - and the executive was responsible for, you guessed it, executing1st secretaries landed with all the decisionscentral power there was.

Source: I lived there and observed the politics first hand. ;-)

The 1st Party secretary was the boss is the Russian and Ukrainian regions (oblast/krai). In the ethnic regions, the 1st secretary was "the local" and the 2nd secretary was a Russian (or, rarely, Ukrainian or even Belorussian) and it was the 2nd secretary who held the actual power. The only exception was Kolbin whose appointment as the 1st Secretary in Kazakhstan in 1986 lead to riots.

That said, the division of responsibilities was roughly similar to that at the national level: the decisions were made at the party committee (and both Soviet chairman and executive committee chairman were members thereof) under the guidance of the secretary, and the Soviet chairman was responsible for getting the Soviet to rubber stamp the decisions and the executive was responsible for, you guessed it, executing the decisions.

Source: I lived there. ;-)

General Division of Responsibilities

The division of responsibilities was roughly similar to that at the national level: the decisions were made at the party committee (and both Soviet chairman and executive committee chairman were members thereof, together with the police and KGB bosses) under the guidance of the secretary, and the Soviet chairman was responsible for getting the Soviet to rubber stamp the decisions and the executive was responsible for, you guessed it, executing the decisions.

Ethnic Regions

The 1st Party secretary was the supreme boss in the Russian and Ukrainian regions (oblast/krai). In the ethnic regions, the 1st secretary was "the local", representing the ethnic/tribal elites, and the 2nd secretary was a Russian (or, rarely, Ukrainian or even Belorussian) sent in from the Center, and it was the 2nd secretary who (unofficially) held the supreme power (because the power in the USSR flowed from Moscow to regional centers, and from those to local centers &c). 

The only exception I can recall was Kolbin whose appointment as the 1st Secretary in Kazakhstan in December 1986 lead to riots.

The possible exceptions in the other direction were Aliyev (who had KGB roots and thus did not need a Moscow baby-sitter) and Kunaev who was a personal ally of Brezhnev.

Post-USSR (response to a comment)

When the USSR collapsed in 1991, the 2nd secretaries lost their power source - Moscow was no longer to be reckoned with - and the 1st secretaries landed with all the central power there was.

Source: I lived there and observed the politics first hand.

kolbin
Source Link
sds
  • 27k
  • 2
  • 90
  • 143

The 1st Party secretary was the boss is the Russian and Ukrainian regions (oblast/krai). In the ethnic regions, the 1st secretary was "the local" and the 2nd secretary was a Russian (or, rarely, Ukrainian or even Belorussian) and it was the 2nd secretary who held the actual power. The only exception was Kolbin whose appointment as the 1st Secretary in Kazakhstan in 1986 lead to riots.

That said, the division of responsibilities was roughly similar to that at the national level: the decisions were made at the party committee (and both Soviet chairman and executive committee chairman were members thereof) under the guidance of the secretary, and the Soviet chairman was responsible for getting the Soviet to rubber stamp the decisions and the executive was responsible for, you guessed it, executing the decisions.

Source: I lived there. ;-)

The 1st Party secretary was the boss is the Russian and Ukrainian regions (oblast/krai). In the ethnic regions, the 1st secretary was "the local" and the 2nd secretary was a Russian (or, rarely, Ukrainian or even Belorussian) and it was the 2nd secretary who held the actual power.

That said, the division of responsibilities was roughly similar to that at the national level: the decisions were made at the party committee (and both Soviet chairman and executive committee chairman were members thereof) under the guidance of the secretary, and the Soviet chairman was responsible for getting the Soviet to rubber stamp the decisions and the executive was responsible for, you guessed it, executing the decisions.

Source: I lived there. ;-)

The 1st Party secretary was the boss is the Russian and Ukrainian regions (oblast/krai). In the ethnic regions, the 1st secretary was "the local" and the 2nd secretary was a Russian (or, rarely, Ukrainian or even Belorussian) and it was the 2nd secretary who held the actual power. The only exception was Kolbin whose appointment as the 1st Secretary in Kazakhstan in 1986 lead to riots.

That said, the division of responsibilities was roughly similar to that at the national level: the decisions were made at the party committee (and both Soviet chairman and executive committee chairman were members thereof) under the guidance of the secretary, and the Soviet chairman was responsible for getting the Soviet to rubber stamp the decisions and the executive was responsible for, you guessed it, executing the decisions.

Source: I lived there. ;-)

Grammatical changes: present tense to past tense
Source Link
Fred
  • 2.9k
  • 1
  • 21
  • 29
Loading
added 30 characters in body
Source Link
sds
  • 27k
  • 2
  • 90
  • 143
Loading
Source Link
sds
  • 27k
  • 2
  • 90
  • 143
Loading