Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 20, 2021 at 14:33 vote accept walrus
Apr 12, 2021 at 14:14 comment added walrus Yes - the comment about Xenophon clearly indicates that to my mind, but I was asking if it didn't only mean that he'd learnt ancient Greek.
Apr 11, 2021 at 13:44 comment added Henry I would say the context suggests precisely that to be a Grecian did mean that he had learnt ancient Greek.
Apr 11, 2021 at 10:15 comment added walrus Yes indeed, I appreciate that he could have gone to university at 17, but it seems extremely unlikely that he would have finished university and gone to sea by 17 without the novelist mentioning it.
Apr 11, 2021 at 5:04 comment added user3482749 @jamesqf Under 18? Certainly not. In particular, it is extremely common for students from Scotland to start university at 17. Under 16 is much rarer, but still by no means newsworthy, except perhaps in the local papers of some very small village that such a student might come from.
Apr 11, 2021 at 3:48 comment added jamesqf @user3482749: But how often are they used? Seldom enough, I think, that the occasional university student under 18 is newsworthy.
Apr 11, 2021 at 3:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackHistory/status/1381079728291987456
Apr 10, 2021 at 16:37 comment added user3482749 @jamesqf Cambridge, at least, still has policies and arrangements in place for students under 16.
Apr 10, 2021 at 4:10 comment added jamesqf Re being only 17, British (and other) universities were not so age-obsessed then as they are in the modern day. Apparently students could be admitted even younger than 14, per the answer to this question: history.stackexchange.com/questions/41469/…
Apr 10, 2021 at 0:24 history became hot network question
Apr 9, 2021 at 16:38 answer added Pieter Geerkens timeline score: 16
Apr 9, 2021 at 16:21 history asked walrus CC BY-SA 4.0