4 replaced http://history.stackexchange.com/ with https://history.stackexchange.com/
source | link

Possible Duplicate:
Why was Africa colonized last of the continents in the Age of Discovery?Why was Africa colonized last of the continents in the Age of Discovery?

When the British colonized the Americas and Australia, they made sure to move normal civilians in and take over the land, pushing the original natives out of their way (either by killing them or by sending them west and/or to reservations).

This was different than the Spanish strategy of just plundering the occupied land for gold. Yet, when they colonized Africa, they never actually colonized the territories they claimed. Why not?

Possible Duplicate:
Why was Africa colonized last of the continents in the Age of Discovery?

When the British colonized the Americas and Australia, they made sure to move normal civilians in and take over the land, pushing the original natives out of their way (either by killing them or by sending them west and/or to reservations).

This was different than the Spanish strategy of just plundering the occupied land for gold. Yet, when they colonized Africa, they never actually colonized the territories they claimed. Why not?

Possible Duplicate:
Why was Africa colonized last of the continents in the Age of Discovery?

When the British colonized the Americas and Australia, they made sure to move normal civilians in and take over the land, pushing the original natives out of their way (either by killing them or by sending them west and/or to reservations).

This was different than the Spanish strategy of just plundering the occupied land for gold. Yet, when they colonized Africa, they never actually colonized the territories they claimed. Why not?

3 insert duplicate link
source | link

Possible Duplicate:
Why was Africa colonized last of the continents in the Age of Discovery?

When the British colonized the Americas and Australia, they made sure to move normal civilians in and take over the land, pushing the original natives out of their way (either by killing them or by sending them west and/or to reservations).

This was different than the Spanish strategy of just plundering the occupied land for gold. Yet, when they colonized Africa, they never actually colonized the territories they claimed. Why not?

When the British colonized the Americas and Australia, they made sure to move normal civilians in and take over the land, pushing the original natives out of their way (either by killing them or by sending them west and/or to reservations).

This was different than the Spanish strategy of just plundering the occupied land for gold. Yet, when they colonized Africa, they never actually colonized the territories they claimed. Why not?

Possible Duplicate:
Why was Africa colonized last of the continents in the Age of Discovery?

When the British colonized the Americas and Australia, they made sure to move normal civilians in and take over the land, pushing the original natives out of their way (either by killing them or by sending them west and/or to reservations).

This was different than the Spanish strategy of just plundering the occupied land for gold. Yet, when they colonized Africa, they never actually colonized the territories they claimed. Why not?

    Post Closed as "exact duplicate" by canadiancreed of
    Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackHistory/status/132915441965350913
2 Copy edited.
source | link

When the British colonized the Americas and Australia, they made sure to move normal civilians in and take over the land, pushing the original Nativesnatives out of their way (either by killing them or by sending them west and/to reservationsor to reservations).  

This was different thenthan the Spanish strategy of just plundering the occupied land for gold. Yet, when they colonized Africa, they never actually colonized the territories they claimed.

  Why not?

When the British colonized the Americas and Australia, they made sure to move normal civilians in and take over the land, pushing the original Natives out of their way (either by killing them or by sending them west/to reservations).  

This was different then the Spanish strategy of just plundering the occupied land for gold. Yet, when they colonized Africa, they never actually colonized the territories they claimed.

  Why not?

When the British colonized the Americas and Australia, they made sure to move normal civilians in and take over the land, pushing the original natives out of their way (either by killing them or by sending them west and/or to reservations).

This was different than the Spanish strategy of just plundering the occupied land for gold. Yet, when they colonized Africa, they never actually colonized the territories they claimed. Why not?

1
source | link