Skip to main content
21 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 18 at 8:04 comment added Kate Bunting Small beer, a dilute form, was given to children and used for thirst-quenching.
Jul 31, 2023 at 19:12 answer added JMS timeline score: 0
Jun 17, 2020 at 9:02 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Apr 17, 2019 at 9:31 answer added Diana Zuidema timeline score: 0
Sep 7, 2018 at 20:28 history edited MCW CC BY-SA 4.0
edited title
Apr 7, 2018 at 6:58 vote accept Muz
Apr 3, 2018 at 20:06 comment added Rob Crawford Modern (specially bred) champagne yeast can tolerate 10-12% alcohol. That's the highest I've ever seen in any strain, natural or not. This doesn't mean the result is "sterile", because other things will grow in the resulting fluid. Most famously, mother of vinegar...
Jun 2, 2016 at 21:35 answer added Microbius timeline score: 1
Feb 23, 2015 at 20:58 comment added BOB @BenCrowell 5% alcohol by volume is the mid range that you get in regular fermentation 7-8% being the cut off range without specialist yeast. While the original brewers must not have had very strong beer as it would often been left to self inoculate, wine and other fruit ferments could have soared as far as 10% due to the natural yeasts present on the skin of the fruit, which have a better tolerance to alcohol. So, I disagree with your 5% statement.
Jan 5, 2015 at 17:41 answer added Greg timeline score: 3
Jan 5, 2015 at 17:34 comment added Greg Two correction: 1) brewing itself contains a boiling element, however pure water boiled doesnt remain sterile. 2) Your quotation most probably mixed up cause with result: the alcohol tolerance in the West is the result of adaptation to alcohol drinking, and not the other way.
Jan 1, 2015 at 14:13 answer added Jool timeline score: 2
Aug 14, 2014 at 15:57 comment added user2848 Fermentation doesn't turn water into alcohol. It turns sugars into alcohol, resulting in a maximum of about 5% alcohol before the yeast go dormant.
Aug 13, 2014 at 5:48 answer added Rj Dieken timeline score: 4
Mar 20, 2013 at 19:45 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackHistory/status/314462623531925504
Mar 19, 2013 at 13:07 answer added Nathan timeline score: 4
Mar 19, 2013 at 11:14 comment added Muz @MarkC.Wallace Thanks, I rewrote the question to make it clearer. First part is to confirm the assumption of whether/how alcohol was used as a source of water. Second part is to compare those societies to the ones who boiled water. I'm assuming people back then knew of the benefits of food preservation and treated alcohol in a similar manner, even without germ theory.
Mar 19, 2013 at 11:10 history edited Muz CC BY-SA 3.0
Made the question clearer
Mar 18, 2013 at 11:39 answer added jwenting timeline score: 1
Mar 18, 2013 at 10:27 answer added Peter Flom timeline score: 0
Mar 18, 2013 at 8:40 history asked Muz CC BY-SA 3.0