Skip to main content
20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 3, 2016 at 12:29 vote accept zefciu
Dec 30, 2013 at 9:04 comment added o0'. @EugeneSeidel 10% for such a thing is a lot.
Sep 13, 2013 at 13:51 comment added Lennart Regebro The question "could he have suspected" is a resounding "yes". He could. He probably didn't. But that's a pretty silly question. The question also seems to really be "was he lying" which of course in not answerable. Voting to keep closed.
Sep 12, 2013 at 7:22 comment added Eugene Seidel To reopen this question, I suggest that the following information be added: (1) Someone in ancient Greece calculated the circumference of the earth to within, I don't quite remember, ten percent accuracy; (2) this information was known in 15th-century Spain; (3) How did Columbus expect to travel so far with limited provisions; (4) How did he react to the much sooner than expected landfall. At least (1) and (2) must be added.
Sep 12, 2013 at 5:32 review Reopen votes
Sep 13, 2013 at 13:51
Apr 18, 2013 at 8:39 comment added zefciu It is not unplausible that he made an error. It is unplausible that he didn't have it corrected.
Apr 17, 2013 at 22:29 comment added Steven Drennon Sorry, but I don't see any way that this question could be answered without speculating. I agree that it would be a better fit for Skeptics.SE.
Apr 17, 2013 at 18:37 comment added New Alexandria Again, recommended for Skeptics.SE
Apr 17, 2013 at 18:28 comment added MCW I'm sympathetic to re-opening, but not without evidence. Otherwise it is random speculation. Why is it implausible that Columbus made an error?
Apr 17, 2013 at 17:42 review Reopen votes
Apr 17, 2013 at 22:29
Apr 17, 2013 at 17:28 comment added Felix Goldberg I edited the title, according to @RISwampYankee 's suggestion and also edited the keywords a bit. I think the question can be opened with the new neutral title.
Apr 17, 2013 at 17:27 history edited Felix Goldberg CC BY-SA 3.0
edited tags; edited title
Apr 17, 2013 at 16:41 comment added RI Swamp Yankee This is actually an interesting question, that needs better phrasing - "Could Columbus have suspected the New World lay on his path to India?" The answer is, actually, "Maybe, but probably not" and involves a survey of Renaissance Italy, Basque, Irish, Scandanavian and African culture, and how well they cross-polinated, if at all.
Apr 17, 2013 at 15:59 history closed MCW
Luke_0
Tom Au
choster
DVK
off topic
Apr 17, 2013 at 15:23 answer added Felix Goldberg timeline score: 6
Apr 17, 2013 at 15:21 comment added Darek Wędrychowski In order to make it possible, one of three things would have to happen. Columbus being a time traveler, having close encounter with representatives of some alien form of life or having a vision from God himself. This way either the reliable sources on that matter 1) weren't written yet, as the case will start in the future, 2) are kept in some kind of Galactic Library, written in the language most probably not available for us 3) need to be taken at faith, or are kept in Vatican, which would be the easiest, especially that there's an American resident recently.
Apr 17, 2013 at 14:35 review Close votes
Apr 17, 2013 at 16:01
Apr 17, 2013 at 14:28 comment added Luke_0 This question might be on-topic at Skeptics.SE.
Apr 17, 2013 at 14:21 comment added MCW Vote to close; unless there is some evidence, this is counterfactual pseudoscience. Is there a possibility that Columbus lied? Yes. But if you assume that he knew about the existence of the America's and rather than publishing his knowledge he conspired to take a risky ocean voyage, then you enter the realm of pseudohistory.
Apr 17, 2013 at 13:38 history asked zefciu CC BY-SA 3.0