What was the name of the Ottoman-Spanish truce in 1580?

Question

As I'm reading the history of the Western Mediterranean about this period, I found many references to a truce between the Ottomans and Habsburg Spain in 1580.

For example, Wikipedia - Habsburg Spain:

Philip lacked the resources to fight both the Netherlands and the Ottoman Empire at the same time, and the stalemate in the Mediterranean continued until Spain agreed to a truce in 1580.

Ottoman Algeria

After Spain had sent an embassy to Constantinople in 1578 to negotiate a truce, leading to a formal peace in August 1580, the Regency of Algiers was a formal Ottoman territory, rather than just a military base in the war against Spain

Looking at this box, it seems that the truce was observed. There is no major engagement in the Mediterannean until 1613, despite a lot of battles listed before 1580. Coincidentally, at this time the Ottomans were busy with Persia and Spain with the Dutch and England, so this truce must have been convenient for them.

However I can't find any details about this truce. Is there a formal name for it? At what level was it agreed, e.g. was it agreed between the monarchs? What are the terms of the truce, were there any territorial exchange or delineation? Are there other arrangement (e.g. payments, promise to support or not support other powers)? And how long did it eventually last?

Answer 1

As noted in Alan G. Jamieson's Lords of the Sea: A History of the Barbary Corsairs

and confirmed here the truce of 1580 simply called an end to the fighting between the Spanish and Ottoman Empires that never resumed. There were never any official peace talks, and so no formal agreement on territorial concessions was ever negotiated.

The Ottomans were first occupied with a war against Persia (Iran) and then with an attempt from 1593-1606 to capture Vienna from the Austrians .

Philip II in turn became preoccupied with his attempt to subdue both the Dutch Republic and England that consumed hos attentions for the remainder of his reign.

This effective abandonment of the Western and Central Mediterranean by the navies of both Spain and the Ottoman Empire, combined with the gradual decline of both Venice and Genoa, led to the rise of the Barbary states, and their associated piracy. This would continue into the 19th century when the combined efforts of British, French and United States military forces subdued them.

Answer 2

Spain was fighting on two fronts. On one hand, the Netherlands wanted independence from Spain. And on the other hand, the Ottoman empire was unstoppable in Eastern Europe. Christianity was divided in two and the Ottomans were advancing.

In the end, it was decided that the Spanish navy was to join with Italian states navy against the Ottoman navy. The Spanish tercios would be concentrated mainly in the Netherlands and in a minor way against Ottomans. Most of Spanish/Habsburg kings were fed up with the Christian countries because they didn't join with them; they were concentrating on attacking Spain rather than joining forces.

The cost of fighting on two fronts was high. Normally, for both empires to make peace.

Not to say that the Netherlands was Spanish by heritage. Most of Spaniards and tercios were so fed up with fighting there because no matter how many battles the tercios won, the dutch continue fighting. "Was a hell with no-end but the head of Spanish government was stubborn to control it". That never-ending war provoked even internal rebellions in Spain.

Answer 3

Empires of the sea by Roger Crowley: 'In 1580, Philips signed a peace treaty with the sultan... Based on Andrew Hess, The Battle of Lepanto Oxford 1972