33

I've been watching classic cartoon shorts from Disney and Warner Brothers. So many devoted time to encouraging Americans to buy war bonds.

Did money collected from war bonds amount to a significant contribution to the overall US war effort? Were those who purchased war bonds rewarded with a decent return, or was it more of a philanthropic sacrifice for the country?

Improve this question
1
  • 2
    In further research, I found that the strategy of the government with regard to national debt is to grow the economy such that debt that appears monstrous in now becomes insignificant in the future. (It is strange to think that inflation helps to cure national debt.) It sounds like war bonds (in total dollar amounts) probably did more to help the American people than it helped fund the war.
    – Brien Malone
    Commented Feb 12, 2012 at 9:28

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
36

The sale of war bonds "sterilized" the otherwise humongous U.S. debt. That is, while debt was historically large (by any standards except today's), we "owed it to ourselves" and not to foreigners. Which is to say that the money was available to be "recycled" into the U.S. economy after the war.

But the main benefit was AFTER the war. The country saved something like 25% of its GDP annually during almost four years of war. When it ended, the average American family had almost one year's wages in savings, most of it in war bonds.

That financed the greatest peacetime economic boom in American history, and allowed for returning soldiers to be employed in civilian pursuits, at higher productivity rates than they enjoyed before the war.

Improve this answer
6
  • 1
    Brilliant! Thank you. That was exactly the sort of answer I was hoping for. Bonds were more useful than I imagined. I think the constant push to "invest in America" helped inspire nationalism as well. Any thoughts as to why we don't see similar drives today?
    – Brien Malone
    Commented Nov 12, 2011 at 3:00
  • 2
    @BrienMalone: We should. Jimmy Carter would have called it the "moral equivalent of war." He was not a good President in most respects, but he was right on the money with "moral" issue. That's the kind of leadership we need today (a more effective version, that is).
    – Tom Au
    Commented Nov 12, 2011 at 16:54
  • 1
    I'd always seen the cartoons for this and the notes on buying bonds, but never gave consideration for what would happen after. The idea of one years wages of savings would definitely be an impact at the time, very nice.
    – MichaelF
    Commented Nov 14, 2011 at 12:57
  • 1
    @TomAu - What exactly are you saying Carter would have called the moral equivalent of war?
    – Chad
    Commented Nov 15, 2011 at 18:37
  • @Chad -- I didn't quite follow that either until I read up on the speech. Carter's "moral equivalent of war" speech was about the energy crisis. He was trying to drive the people to respond to the energy crisis by saving and reducing consumption - the way we did in times of war. (The speech gained a lot of notoriety, but didn't result in any long term behavioral change.)
    – Brien Malone
    Commented Feb 12, 2012 at 9:24
0

They were really, really, really significant for the United States. They were able to raise over 150 billion dollars for the treasury by bonds. This helped fuel the U.S. war effort and supply troops with weapons, tanks, guns, etc. Without these bonds, the war could've lasted longer, or been harder to win. The bonds helped the U.S. win the war and were very influential.

Improve this answer
6
  • 2
    Is there any research to back up this set of opinions?
    – MCW ♦
    Commented Jan 21, 2016 at 14:58
  • 1
    Not that wikipedia is a definitive resource, but "Over the course of the war 85 million Americans purchased bonds totalling approximately $185 billion." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_bond. I have seen estimates that the war cost the U.S. $300 billion, so that is not a trivial amount. (fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RS22926.pdf)
    – Brien Malone
    Commented Jan 21, 2016 at 18:57
  • I remember seeing the dollar amount in a TV show by history, I wasn't sure if it was $185 but I think it was.
    – tstols
    Commented Jan 22, 2016 at 1:11
  • @MarkC.Wallace yes, from the tv documentary, World War Two from space.
    – tstols
    Commented Jan 22, 2016 at 15:41
  • 1
    Please link to the source in the answer - otherwise this is just an opinion.
    – MCW ♦
    Commented Jan 22, 2016 at 18:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.