The Philippines was under Spanish rule for over 333 years. After the Battle of Manila Bay and the Treaty of Paris (1898), rule of the Philippines was transferred from Spain to the USA.

From a brief period between 1942-1945, the Philippines was under Japanese rule. The Americans officially granted independence to the Philippines in 1946.

If we add it all up, the Philippines was under foreign rule for almost 400 years.

Is there any other nation on Earth that had been under foreign rule longer?

  • 8
    Depends on how you define 'foreign', probably. I could make the argument that Israel was under foreign rule from 70 to 1948, or that parts of America have been under foreign rule since the 17th century. – Avi Sep 1 '13 at 4:43
  • 3
    England has been ruled by monarchs with Danish, French, Scottish and German origin (including the present dynasty) – Louis Rhys Sep 1 '13 at 14:39
  • 6
    The question doesn't contain stable theoretical terms and this is troll bait. – Samuel Russell Sep 1 '13 at 22:15
  • 8
    It's hard to define this even if you are neutral. Gotland has been under foreign rule for 1500 years or so. Most people would laugh if you say that and go "what, foreign? Gotland is a part of Sweden". So at some point the foreign rule becomes non-foreign just by virtue of have been going on long enough. So this is not answerable. – Lennart Regebro Sep 2 '13 at 1:53
  • 4
    I think Vector is right, this question is just a victim of the normal discourse about "nations" and "nation states" as if these are things that actually exist. – Lennart Regebro Sep 2 '13 at 7:37

It's a bit unclear what you mean by "nation" and "foreign rule," and if your question is "what is the longest" or, is there a place that was under foreign rule longer than the Philippines.

But - we have several places, according to what appear to be your criteria, that were under foreign rule longer than the 333 years you cite for the Philippines, although not all of them as as long as the total for the Philippines if you include also American and Japanese rule:

Goa is a former Portuguese province; the Portuguese overseas territory of Portuguese India existed for about 450 years until it was annexed by India in 1961.

Parts of New Guinea, which has a complicated history:

The first European contact with New Guinea was by Portuguese and Spanish sailors in the 16th century. In 1526-27 the Portuguese explorer Jorge de Meneses saw the western tip of New Guinea and named it ilhas dos Papuas. In 1528 Spanish navigator Álvaro de Saavedra also recorded its sighting when trying to return from Tidore to New Spain. In 1545 the Spaniard Íñigo Ortíz de Retes sailed along the north coast of New Guinea as far as the Mamberamo River near which he landed on 20 June, naming the island 'Nueva Guinea'.[35] The first map showing the whole island (as an island) was published in 1600 and shows it as 'Nova Guinea'. In 1606 Luís Vaz de Torres explored the southern coast of New Guinea from Milne Bay to the Gulf of Papua including Orangerie Bay which he named Bahía de San Lorenzo. His expedition also discovered Basilaki Island naming it Tierra de San Buenaventura, which he claimed for Spain in July 1606.[36] On October 18 his expedition reached the western part of the island in present-day Indonesia, and also claimed the territory for the King of Spain.

Another candidate might be Inner Mongolia:

The eastern Mongol tribes near and in Manchuria, particularly the Khorchin and Southern Khalkha in today's Inner Mongolia intermarried, formed alliances with, and fought against the Jurchen tribes until Nurhaci, the founder of the new Jin Dynasty, consolidated his control over all groups in the area in 1593...

Indonesia: Following three and a half centuries of Dutch colonialism, Indonesia secured its independence after World War II.

(Wiki is apparently calculating from 1602 when the Dutch East India Company became the dominant force in Indonesia until 1949, when Indonesia finally achieved complete independence from the Dutch.)

So here you have three or more places which might meet your criteria. But if you look carefully over the map I am certain there are more places, depending on your exact criteria, particularly islands in the Pacific, the Mediterranean and the East and West Indies.

Consider for example Autonomous Region of the Azores (under Portuguese administration)

One (unproven) hypothesis is that the Azores were discovered in the course of a 1341 mapping expedition to the Canary Islands, sponsored by King Afonso IV of Portugal and commanded by the Florentine Angiolino del Tegghia de Corbizzi and the Genoese Nicoloso da Recco. Although not quite described in the 1341 report, Madeira and the Azores might nonetheless have been seen from a distance on the expedition's return via a long sailing arc (volta do mar) from the Canary islands.[16] Even if not discovered by the 1341 mapping expedition itself, the islands may have been found by any of the numerous Majorcan expeditions that were launched into the Atlantic Ocean in the aftermath, destined for slaving runs on the newly-mapped Canary islands. Nonetheless, regardless of who sighted them in the 14th century, there seems to have been no follow-up until the 15th century.

Autonomous Region of the Madeira (under Portuguese administration

Madeira was discovered by Portuguese sailors in the service of Infante D. Henrique (Henry the Navigator) in 1419, and settled after 1420. The archipelago is considered to be the first territorial discovery of the exploratory period of the Portuguese Age of Discovery.

Canary Islands - one of Spain's 17 autonomous communities:

There may have been a Portuguese expedition that attempted to colonize the islands as early as 1336, but there is not enough hard evidence to support this. In 1402, the Castilian conquest of the islands began, with the expedition of French explorers Jean de Béthencourt and Gadifer de la Salle, nobles and vassals of Henry III of Castile, to Lanzarote. From there, they conquered Fuerteventura (1405) and El Hierro. Béthencourt received the title King of the Canary Islands, but still recognized King Henry III as his overlord.

British Virgin Islands are (today still) a British overseas territory:

The Dutch established a permanent settlement on the island of Tortola by 1648. In 1672, the English captured Tortola from the Dutch, and the English annexation of Anegada and Virgin Gorda followed in 1680. Meanwhile, over the period 1672–1733, the Danish gained control of the nearby islands of Saint Thomas, Saint John and Saint Croix.

Depending on how one calculates, the British Virgin Islands might be considered "under foreign rule" for over 350 years.

In medieval and ancient times, we have more examples to consider, for example:

Gaul - today France:

Roman control of Gaul lasted for five centuries, until the last Roman rump state, the Domain of Soissons, fell to the Franks in AD 486

Roman Britain

Roman Britain, referred to by the Romans as Britannia, was the part of the island of Great Britain controlled by the Roman Empire from 43 AD until c. 410.

Ancient Egypt, under the Greeks and Romans was ruled by these two powers continuously from 323 BC until at least 269 AD, a period of well over 500 years. (However, as Lennart Regebro has pointed out in the comments, it is debatable if the Ptolemaic Kingdom constituted an extension and continuation of the Greek Empire, or it was an Egyptian entity, the result of usurpation of the Egyptian throne by the Greek Ptolemies - see the comments regarding this):

The Ptolemaic Kingdom (/ˌtɒləˈmeɪ.ɪk/; Greek: Πτολεμαϊκὴ βασιλεία, Ptolemaïkḕ Basileía)1 was a Hellenistic kingdom in Egypt. It was ruled by the Ptolemaic dynasty that Ptolemy I Soter founded after the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BC—which ended with the death of Cleopatra VII and the Roman conquest in 30 BC...

The Roman province of Egypt (Latin: Aegyptus, pronounced [ai̯ˈgyp.tus]; Greek: Αἴγυπτος Aigyptos [ɛ́ːɣyptos]) was established in 30 BC after Octavian (the future emperor Augustus) defeated his rival Mark Antony, deposed his lover Queen Cleopatra VII and annexed the Ptolemaic kingdom of Egypt to the Roman Empire. The province encompassed most of modern-day Egypt except for the Sinai Peninsula (which would later be conquered by Trajan).

Zenobia, queen of Palmyra, took the country away from the Romans when she conquered Aegyptus in 269, declaring herself the Queen of Egypt also....

Transylvania (now consolidated into Romania):

Between 1003 and 1526, Transylvania was a voivodeship of the Kingdom of Hungary, led by a voivode appointed by the Hungarian King.

Perhaps Albania (Investigate also other nations in far eastern Europe who were ruled by the Ottomans for long periods of time - they may also be candidates):

The Ottomans erected their garrisons throughout southern Albania by 1415 and established formal jurisdiction over most of Albania by 1431....Albania remained under Ottoman control as part of the Rumelia province until 1912, when the first independent Albanian state was declared.


Clearly, although the Philippines was indeed under "foreign rule" for a long period of time, it cannot lay claim to the dubious distinction of having the longest such period. Of all the examples cited, IMO Egypt, Gaul, and Transylvania might best qualify as the "longest," all in the neighborhood of 500 years, being quite clearly defined geographic areas with fairly homogeneous, indigenous populations that were conquered and ruled continuously by arguably true nation-states in the modern sense. In the modern era, Goa is probably the best example

But we could go on, depending on your time parameters, and definitions of "nation", and "foreign rule", which is why your question has been closed.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    With the type of definition of "nation" you seem to use, I give you Finland: From at least 1249 to 1809 part of Sweden, from 1809 to 1917 part of Russia. Minimum 668 years. :-) – Lennart Regebro Sep 2 '13 at 1:57
  • 1
    @LennartRegebro - could be. Obviously the definition of "nation" is problematic in the question itself. What was going in the Philippines before the Spaniards came in? Islamic rule, tribes, etc. If we wanted to to we could probably include every place on earth. In my conclusion I did try to go with fairly well defined "nations" that were conquered by other fairly well defined "nations". The question is, was there a Finnish "nation" that was taken over by the Swedes, or just a group of indigenious people called "Finns". But agreed, Finland is probably no worse than some of my examples. – user2590 Sep 2 '13 at 2:08
  • @LennartRegebro - I think Egypt being ruled by the Greeks and Romans is the best example up there of a clearly defined nation that was ruled by other clearly defined nations. – user2590 Sep 2 '13 at 2:16
  • 1
    Calling the Ptolemaic rule "foreign" though means that England has been under foreign rule since the dark ages, when Anglo-saxons arrived. And that's assuming the time between roman rule and anglo-saxon was by English guys. It's not actually ruled by a foreign power, it's just that the rulers are foreign. – Lennart Regebro Sep 2 '13 at 2:21
  • @LennartRegebro ""not actually ruled by a foreign power, just that the rulers are foreign"-this is an excellent point, although IMO it's not quite that clear. I see that Ptolemy I Soter was one of Alexander's potential successors, and conquered Egypt as a Greek general, afterwards making himself Pharoah, bringing Greek culture and language to Egypt. So the Ptolemaic Kingdom was a sort of extension of Greece. Then Rome "annexed the Ptolemaic kingdom of Egypt to the Roman Empire." That says to me that it was already considered "Greek Territory" and therefore Rome's natural legacy. – user2590 Sep 2 '13 at 3:19

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.