How did the Egyptian engineers of the Third and Fourth Dynasty construct the Pyramids and Sphinx without modern science and mathematics?

What was the "state of the art" in engineering, science, and mathematics in Ancient Egypt when the Sphinx and the Giza Pyramids were built during the Third and Fourth Dynasties? How did they accomplish these engineering feats without modern engineering knowledge & tools? What techniques did they actually use that were successful?

The Great Pyramid of Giza was built to house the remains of the Pharaohs and thus meant to last forever. How did their techniques contribute to the permanency of the Giza structures?

  • 9
    Remember: The buildings that lasted a thousand years are well, the ones that lasted. Most ancient buildings and monument did not last. But you don't notice them, because, well, they didn't last. Oct 19 '13 at 9:28
  • 2
    @LennartRegebro We can build for eternity when we have to. Consider the very interesting topic of nuclear semiotics for 10,000 - 100,000 year fission waste storage. Oct 22 '13 at 7:58
  • 1
    Question lacks preliminary research and relies on questionable assumptions.
    – MCW
    Oct 22 '13 at 11:25
  • 1
    Actually, a reasonable, narrower version of the question might be, "what was the "state of the art" in science, engineering, and mathematics at the time the Sphinx/Pyramids were built?" Then I asked what techniques did they actually use, successfully, which can be answered factually. I nominate the question for reopening in its current form.
    – Tom Au
    Nov 4 '15 at 21:03
  • 1
    There is already a good Wikipedia article on Egyptian pyramid construction techniques. If there's something you'd like to ask about beyond what is in that article, go ahead.
    – Schwern
    Nov 11 '15 at 20:02

Modern scientific and mathematical knowledge was not necessary for building structures that would last a long time. For that, empirical knowledge, based on experience, was sufficient.

History of structural engineering:

Pyramids were the most common major structures built by ancient civilizations because the structural form of a pyramid is inherently stable and can be almost infinitely scaled (as opposed to most other structural forms, which cannot be linearly increased in size in proportion to increased loads)

Throughout ancient and medieval history most architectural design and construction was carried out by artisans, such as stone masons and carpenters, rising to the role of master builder. No theory of structures existed and understanding of how structures stood up was extremely limited, and based almost entirely on empirical evidence of 'what had worked before'. Knowledge was retained by guilds and seldom supplanted by advances. Structures were repetitive, and increases in scale were incremental.

It requires no sophisticated math or modern engineering knowledge to build simple structures, even though they are quite large and durable - you simply rely on your experience of what worked before and take it to the next small step.

Modern advances were required only when structures became more complex and sophisticated: Increased ratio of bulk vs usable space - size vs load, for example modern skyscrapers; spanning large expanses of space, for example modern suspension and cantilever bridges; building large, complex forms, for example the Guggenheim Museum; building structures based not on previous experience, but on mathematical predictions, for example the Tacoma-Narrows bridge. (That one didn't work out too well, but it's a well known example...)

Source: Understanding the World's Greatest Structures: Science and Innovation from Antiquity to Modernity - Lectures 1,2 - Professor Stephen Ressler, United States Military Academy at West Point Ph.D., Lehigh University.


They used lots of very large, very heavy stones.

You will note that these constructions did not have large internal air pockets relative to volume. They qualify as monuments or fortifications more than inhabitable buildings with a decent amount of floorspace.

Having arches or domes or any large enclosed internal space was considered the height of engineering achievement - and most did not survive well. The internal space of an Egyptian pyramid was a fraction (1.3%) of a modern pyramid like the Louvre skylight (probably 99.5%).

  • 5
    Just as no sophisticated math or engineering is needed by a 4-year old when stacking blocks, none is needed to stack large stones into monumentally sized structures. Of course, there is little room inside such structures for storage or activities. Oct 19 '13 at 16:23
  • Even the Angkor Wat temple in Cambodia is an amazing engineering marvel.
    – Pradeep
    Oct 22 '13 at 6:23

The site www.cheops-pyramide.ch is about how Egyptians were able to achieve an incredible precision when measuring with simple techniques. I'm going to summarize it.

1. Right angles in the corner

The base of the Cheops pyramid forms a perfect square - the deviation from the 90° angle is a maximum of one minute, which is very precise when you consider the Cheops pyramid's side length of 440 Egyptian Cubit or 230.33 meter.

By stretching a cord between two pegs stuck in the ground, a long straight line was marked out. Then to each peg an equal length of string was tied, more than half as long as the line drawn. By keeping the strings stretched tight and moving the ends around, the Egyptians could draw parts of two perfect circles. These arcs cross each other at two points. By drawing a straight line between these two points the original line is bisected at a right angle and the line is cut into two equal parts.

enter image description here

The second method is more astonishing. Although ancient Egyptians did not know the theory behind the Pythagorean Theorem (a² + b² = c²), they did use it unknowingly. They used a so-called primitive Pythagorean triple 3-4-5 (3² + 4² = 5²). Take a long rope, divide it with knots into 12 parts from the exact same length. When you now lay out your rope as a triangle and use 3 parts, 4 parts and 5 parts as side lengths, you get a perfect right angle between your 3 parts and 4 parts side

enter image description here

If needed, they extended the range or size of their triangle by using multiple rods of the same length. Remember, they were handling with 230 meters as one side length

2. Control of the inclination angle with the seked

The Egyptians didn't knew the division of the angle in 360°. From the Rhind Papyrus we know that the Egyptians calculated with a so-called "seked". The return (horizontal displacement) of a wall is measured. Or in other words: How many palms (7.48cm) and fingers (1.87cm) is the upper edge of the wall set back to the lower edge, namely at a height of an Egyptian Cubit (52.4 cm).

enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here

For the Cheops pyramid, the documented Seked was 22 fingers or 5 palms and 1 finger. This results in an inclination angle of 51.84° and only a very tiny difference to the official measurement which is 51.84444°.

3. Leveling the pyramid base

The Cheops pyramid's base area, a square of 230m x 230m (= 52900 m²) has a height difference of only 2.1 cm. This is a remarkable achievement.

The ancient Egyptians knew the square level, which is a right-angled isosceles triangle made from wood. This tool is made in the shape of the letter "A" and looks like a triangle ruler. A plumb-line is suspended from the top of the connected corners. If the plumb bob coincides with a mark in the middle of the crossbeam, the surface area on which the two legs stand is level. By placing this triangle on stone, these could be easily leveled.

enter image description here

Field tests have shown that this method could be used to measure a distance of 45 meter up to a centimeter. Longer distances like our 230 meter do not go, because then the human eye sees too little detail. So far we have three discoveries of such wood triangles, approximately from the grave of Sennedjem at Deir el-Medineh.

4. Aligning the three main pyramids

Unfortunately, the linked source does not go into detail on how the ancient Egyptians did it. But as shown in the picture, all three pyramids are aligned at their square diagonal.

enter image description here

5. Orientation to the north

The pyramids are nearly aligned to true north (deviation is only 2.46°).

A small but precisely worked pyramidion (made from wood or stone) is placed as close as possible to a north-south position on the flattened ground where the pyramid will be built. Then two lines are drawn, taking the edges of the small pyramidion and lengthening them on the side which lies in the shadow. During a day a surveyor notes down, where exactly the tip of the pyramid shadow cuts through those two lines. The pyramidion is precisely aligned north to south, when both lines are cut at the same distance to the corner of the pyramidion. To achieve this, the pyramidion is moved slightly over a period of days, until both segments are exactly the same length.

enter image description here

6. Using a rope roll to transport pyramid stones to the top

There is some historical evidence that ancient Egyptians know a rope roll (that's not a pulley or pulley block). With the help of the rope roll it is possible to haul a 2.5 tons stone block including sledge up the 52° incline of the flank of the pyramid.

This technique can be compared to slinging a rope attached to something heavy up over a branch of a tree and then pulling the heavy object up by grabbing the rope and walking a short distance away from the tree. If you walk down a steep incline you need even less force than on level ground.

enter image description here enter image description here

7. Waterproof joining of stone blocks

The outside surface stones are cut within 0.01 (1/100th) inch of perfectly straight and at nearly perfect right angles for all six sides. And they were placed together with an intentional gap between them.

That 0.02-inch gap was designed to allow space for glue to seal and hold the stones together. A white cement that connected the casing stones and made them watertight is still intact and stronger than the blocks that it joins

Land surveying and the Orion constellation

After answering some of your questions, here's a point for further answers: How did the ancient Egyptians measure their land and use the whole Nile Delta to depict the Orion constellation onto it? We are talking about a distance of 8 kilometers (Pyramid of Djedefre to Gizeh) or 4 kilometers (two unfinished pyramids at Zawiyet el-Aryan to Gizeh)

All pyramids are tied together. The three main pyramids are standing for the Orion belt. And two of the four outer stars exists as smaller (not so famous) pyramids. Only 2 stars are not represented. But they found plans for one more pyramid which should be build at the right position.

enter image description here

  • Pyramids of Zawiyet el-Aryan - Betelgeuse
  • Cheops pyramid - Al Nitak (left belt-star)
  • Chephren pyramid - Al Nilam (middle belt star)
  • Menkaure pyramid - Al Mintaka (right belt-star)
  • Djedefre pyramid in Abu Roash - Rigel



The exact methods used to construct the great pyramids are not known. Currently the authoritative work on this subject is a book by the German, Dieter Arnold "Building in Egypt: Pharaonic Stone Masonry". Personally I find the book by Somers and Engelbach entitled "Ancient Egyptian Construction and Architecture" to be superior in some respects, although it is more dated.

Use of a leveling string. One technique known to be used by the Egyptians is the leveling string. This is string stretched taught against a surface. A string like this can be used to find any high or low points on a surface and allow the surface to be made flat. Also, by placing two surfaces next to each other a leveling string can be used to make both surfaces coplanar.

Use of earthen bulwarks. The Egyptians were known to use earthen bulwarks extensively and in some cases such bulwarks are still in situ, the work never having been completed. The bulwark is just an embankment of earth piled up against the building. Steps can built into it and stones can be lifted up its side and moved into position.

Use of levers. Some rough building blocks are found with knobs that indicate that levers were used to lift or move the blocks.

Use of diorite pounding stones. The Egyptians could smooth stone surfaces using diorite pounding stones which are rocks about the size of a softball. They are very hard. It may seem crude to just pound a rock with another rock, but it is actually very effective. A skilled worker can rapidly flatten or cut out limestone using a pounder. The lower courses of the Pyramid of Mycerinus have unfinished blocks that show that pounders were used to smooth the outer surface of the pyramid after the blocks were set in place. Many quarries throughout Egypt show that pounders were used to cut the limestone out of the quarry.

Use of mortar. Mortar is a sort of very fine sand that is like jelly when moist. Using mortar as a lubricant, stones can be slid over others as long as they are flat. When the mortar dries, it holds the stone in place. Mortar is often found in the joints and layer beds of the pyramids.

Use of the plumb bob. The Egyptians used the plumb bob to find right angles and parallel lines. By using the plumb bob and string it is possible to layout locations where stones should go.

Various other discoveries concerning Egyptian methods can be found in the two books I mentioned earlier.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.