Well I'm doing a research about the history and background of Child Sexual Abuse and due to the few sources related to the topic, I've been stucked ,but recently a I found this book "The Encyclopedia of Child Abuse" with a few lines about the topic:

"Prepubescent boys were commonly prostituted in brothels in ancient Greece and Rome" With no references

The problem that it seems to contradict certain aspects of the Greco-roman cultures

first of all male prostitution in Greece was in essence restricted to adolescents (Affairs of the Heart (25–26)).

Second as far as I know in roman society children have "inviolable" status.

Third it doesn't mention anything about girls.

Fourth, please don't start with the "pederasty" aspect. I refer specifically to children non minors (from 12 and higher) which was the age of consent at the time.

So how reliable is this information ? if anyone knows a better source of information please let me know.

  • 7
    Roman children may have been inviolable by tradition. Slave children are not Roman children.
    – Oldcat
    Apr 17 '14 at 20:42

The modern view of ancient civilization, including that of Greece and Rome, has been heavily censored. Ancient writings on these topics have been systematically expunged or destroyed over the centuries. In general, the ancients were far more promiscuous than society is today. Pederasty was considered somewhat amoral, but was widely practiced. In Rome, forcing somebody else's kid was illegal by the Scatinian law, technically speaking. The reality was a lot of people broke the law. Using slave boys as catamites was more a convenience than a legal necessity, as you could keep the slave boy around 24-7, something that could not be done for a free-born boy. In cases where boys were foster children or had been put into the care of another family, the likelihood of abuse was high, especially if it was a military base or encampment.

  • 3
    If those writings have been destroyed, how can we know this is what happened? Did enough of them survive?
    – o0'.
    Apr 19 '14 at 12:55
  • 3
    It can be inferred from various small pieces of evidence in combination with archaeological findings. For example, when Pompeii was excavated it was a huge shock to a lot of academics. The city was literally plastered in sex. Erect phalluses everywhere, in every house. Pornographic statues and paintings everywhere. Graffiti advertisements for prostitutes literally covering every wall. The King of Italy visited Pompeii with his family shortly after it was discovered. Nobody dared warn the king ahead of time. Man that was EMBARASSING, big time. Then, came the coverup.... Apr 24 '14 at 19:46

Even when the Roman children were protected by law, these laws didn't apply to slave children. There was that loophole in roman law concerning slave children. So there was a little if not nothing romans (citizen) could do.

Because slaves weren't considered persons,but objects instead.

Something similar could happen with greeks, but as you correctly say, it's rare since prostitution by males, was restricted to teenagers.

But that aspect doesn't mean that these societies approved or condone such acts.

For example in ancient Greece a men who had a sexual intercourse with a child (12 or younger); were generally looked down upon for such actions.

  • pretty much, plus the publication is itself highly questionable... So even if it in theory could happen, in practice it may very well not have happened or only rarely.
    – jwenting
    Apr 18 '14 at 6:31
  • That's right. And even if it happened it would've been kept hidden from the outside society. Since it was moraly questionable.
    – Thalia19
    Apr 18 '14 at 15:45

There is another fundamental problem in projecting back current sexual classification onto Rome. They didn't think of it as homosexuality versus heterosexuality. Rather, they thought of it as being the penetrator or the submissive partner.

For a grown man to be penetrated was the shameful act. To be the dominant one, not so much. And since women were always on the penetratee side, well, that's another reason why they were the inferior sex.

This is why the Roman army had ferocious penalties for homosexual acts. Forcing that kind of shame on a Roman soldier was seen as a terrible thing, and was punishable by death.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.