4

I recently attended a presentation on the shift in power over the centuries. The speaker argued that ...

  • the power in the middle ages was in the churches, i.e., the priests and, thus, in the spiritual centers
  • in contrast, in the 17th century there was a shift towards the political centers, i.e., the palaces and the kings and princes, alter also a shift towards democratic institutions
  • nowadays, he argued, the power lies in the economical forces, i.e. the businesses and their CEOs

I suppose that this theory was taken from somewhere, but even with extensive research I could not find any sources for it.

Have you ever heard of a similar theory?

  • 3
    It's a common enough opinion, with similar sentiments in everything from political theory books to science-fiction. I don't know of any single source for the idea, but I don't know that the presenter necessarily needed to have one. It might just be a casual analysis of historical trends. – Nerrolken Oct 7 '14 at 21:31
  • 2
  • Michael Mann - Sources of Social Power – two sheds Nov 13 '14 at 20:52
4

I am considering this a reference request for seminal works on "power" in historiography.

The most well known recent theorist of "power" as a historical determinant is Foucault. In Foucault's work power seems to be organised by a historical context of possibilities of knowledge, an "episteme," that orders how people perceive and enact power. I do not believe that Foucault's conclusions about the organisation of past societies matches your speaker's: Foucault's concept of power is much more developed. Additionally, many historians blanch at the lack of traditional historiography backing Foucault's conclusions.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.