There is a famous story going back to Herodotus according to which Thales of Miletus predicted the solar eclipse of May 28, 585 BC, which interrupted a battle. Given that we don’t have a single contemporary source for that claim, and it is unknown how Thales could have even accomplished such a prediction with the methods available to him, the reliability of this claim should be considered doubtful at best.

What then is the earliest Solar Eclipse that was verifiably predicted in advance? Certainly, that eclipse occurred no later than May 3, 1715, as Edmond Halley predicted that eclipse, with very high accuracy. But is there any instance before that where an eclipse was successfully predicted?

  • 2
    See also the (upcoming) History of Science&Math site.
    – gerrit
    Commented Nov 5, 2014 at 20:32
  • 1
    This should be migrated to the History of science and math site.
    – user3521
    Commented Nov 9, 2014 at 16:18
  • @KennyLJ: ... but not before that site is out of private beta.
    – user4656
    Commented Nov 10, 2014 at 13:28
  • 1
    It is NOT unknown how Thalrs could have accomplished this. All it really requires is a notion of a calendar and the dates of previous eclipses. You may want to edit your question so as not to contain falsehoods.
    – C Monsour
    Commented Jun 29, 2020 at 10:13

6 Answers 6


(This is an incomplete answer since I don't know which eclipse specifically was predicted, nor how it compares to the rest of the world. But it is too long for a comment.)

Because of their cultural association of governmental legitimacy with astronomical/geophysical omens, ancient China was rather obsessed with predicting eclipses. Attempts to do so seemed to have begun in the Warring States era, but naturally were not very successful. Some breakthroughs were achieved in the Eastern Han when it was realised that the moon's motion is inconsistent.

By 20 B.C. the Chinese knew how eclipses were caused […] By 8 B.C. the Chinese could predict eclipses by using the 135 month period; and by A.D. 206 they could predict eclipses by analyzing the motion of the moon. By A.D. 390 they could predict how much of the moon would be in shadow.

— Thurston, Hugh, Early Astronomy, Springer, New York, 1994

These are referring to solar eclipses, as was made clear by the rest of the paragraph discussing ancient disputes over how the moon could block the sun's light. See also:

Astronomers were attached to the royal household as second tier functionaries. […] One of the most important events to predict were eclipses. In the first century B.C. (the Han dynasty), an eclipse period of 135 months was recognized during which 23 eclipses were known. By the third century A.D., the astronomer Yang Wei was able to specify times of first contact for a solar eclipse.

— Case Western Reserve University: Journey Through the Galaxy

By about 20 BC, surviving documents show that Chinese astrologers understood what caused eclipses, and by 8 BC some predictions of total solar eclipse were made using the 135-month recurrence period. By AD 206 Chinese astrologers could predict solar eclipses by analyzing the Moon's motion.

— National Aeronautics and Space Administration: Eclipse Through Traditions and Cultures

It would therefore appear that, that by about the early third century, at least some eclipses were predicted.

Of course, these predictions were not very good, especially since the sun's movement had not been understood. That happened much later in the Tang Dynasty. The monk Yi Xing was able to produce better eclipse predictions based on his research. Another notable advancement in Chinese astronomy was achieved in the Yuan Dynasty, by the astronomers Wang Xun and Guo Shoujin.

This actual movement of the sun was fully understood by the famous astronomer Yi Xing (一行, 683-727 A.D), and he used the theory in his computations, for example the calculations for the time fo eclipses, in his Da Yan calendar (大衍歷, 729 A.D), getting accurate results in the process.


Guo and his co-workers were able to make more accurate astronomical calculations, which helped them to make better astronomical predictions, especially in the case of eclipses.

— Tiong, Ngsay, and and Helmer Aslaksen. "Calendars, Interpolation, Gnomons and Armillary Spheres in the Work of Guo Shoujin (1231–1314)."

Again, the eclipse predictions were still not perfect, especially over the course of centuries. However, a failed prediction was cause for commissioning a new calendar. Conversely, this meant that at least some of the predictions even in this early period were accurate, by chance or otherwise.

One major piece of evidence proposed by Xu in favour of the adoption of Western methods concerned eclipse predictions […] [E]clipse prediction was the touchstone. In 1610, when it was first proposed to employ Jesuits for astronomical reform, the miscalculation of a solar eclipse was used to make the case for the necessity of this reform.

— Jami, Catherine, et al, eds. Statecraft and Intellectual Renewal in Late Ming China: the Cross-Cultural Synthesis of Xu Guangqi (1562-1633). Vol. 50. Brill, 2001.

At this juncture the then-extant Chinese calendars were failing in their predicative powers. The Court held a competition (to predict an eclipse) between the Chinese court astronomers and the Westerners, which resulted in a resounding victory for European astronomy.

  • 6
    "By A.D. 390 they could predict how much of the moon would be in shadow" sounds like they were actually predicting lunar eclipses. While solar and lunar eclipses occur at about the same rate, a lunar eclipse is visible from any point on Earth. As a result, at a given place there will appear to be many more lunar than solar eclipses, making them much more amenable to pattern recognition and thus a lot easier to predict, leaving me to wonder just which type of eclipse the Chinese actually predicted.
    – user4656
    Commented Nov 5, 2014 at 10:52
  • @Pew The parts of the paragraph I took out explicitly referred to solar eclipses (... how the moon could possibly cause an eclipse of the sun ...).
    – Semaphore
    Commented Nov 5, 2014 at 11:00
  • 3
    @Semaphore can you link to a reference for the last sentence? I'd love to read more about that! Commented Nov 5, 2014 at 18:08
  • @JohnFeminella My reference was just the last citation, actually. There wasn't much more details to it. The gist of it was the Chinese astronomers and their calendars failed to predict the eclipses of that year, while Schall von Bell produced accurate calculations; the last Ming Emperor thus commissioned him to produce a new calendar, the Chongzhen_calendar.
    – Semaphore
    Commented Nov 6, 2014 at 9:55

This detailed article argues for the authenticity of Herodotus' report about Thales ecplise prediction in 585 BC. This is in any case a lot earlier than the Chinese material cited by Semaphore.


Wikipedia has an informative article on the Saros cycle, which is used to predict eclipses.

According to that page, and by extension apparently the pages to which it references, the Babylonians were recording the eclipses which describe the cycle in the sixth century BC. Apparently Hipparchus (second century BC), Pliny (first century AD) and Ptolemy (second century AD) were aware of the cyclic nature of eclipses, though the degree to which they could be predicted for a specific location is debatable.

  • 2
    My understanding is that the Antikythera mechanism, dated to between 150 BC and 100 BC, could calculate the dates of solar eclipses, using the Saros cycle.
    – sdenham
    Commented Nov 5, 2014 at 18:12

From a NASA answer:

Ptolemy ( ca 150 BC)[sic] represents the epitome of Greecian astronomy, and surviving records show that he had a sophisticated scheme for predicting both lunar and solar eclipses. Ptolemy knew, for example, the details of the orbit of the Moon including its nodal points, and that the Sun must be within 20d 41' of the Node point, and that up to two solar eclipse could occur within seven months in the same part of the world. Lunar eclipse were especially easy to calculate because of the vast area covered by the Earth's shadow on the Moon. Solar eclipses, however, required much greater finesse and knowledge. The shadow of the Moon on the Earth is less than 100 kilometers wide, and its track across the daytime hemisphere is the result of many complex factors that cannot be anticipated without a nearly-complete understanding of the lunar orbit and speed.

The writeup (available here) also supports the other answers here and provides a lot of related information. (note that Ptolemy actually lived AD, not BC)

  • 6
    Despite what NASA claims, Ptolemy lived ca. 150 AD, not BC.
    – fdb
    Commented Nov 5, 2014 at 14:35

I am going to second dotancohen's answer somewhat. Hipparchus developed a comprehensive astronomy that accurately predicted eclipses and other astronomical events. Ptolemy's writings emanate from the tradition that was established by Hipparchus.

Nevertheless, Hipparchus was certainly not the beginning of Greek astronomy. He simply formalized and improved it. Long before Hipparchus many Greek philosophers were very capable in astronomy and mathematics, such as Thales of Miletus. Although Herodotus lived 100 years after Thales, there is no specific reason I know of to doubt his claim that Thales predicted his eclipse.

Herodotus says that Thales "discovered" the mechanics of eclipses, so this would suggest he considered this new technology at the time, improvements over the Egyptian and Babylonian methods. It is known that the Babylonians could predict lunar eclipses which is pretty easy, but not solar eclipses and the same is probably true for Egyptians.

Also, remember that ancient scientists had access to lots of writings that are now lost, including material on Thales. None of these contradicted Herodotus or corrected his account. In fact, later Greek astronomers repeatedly confirmed what Herodotus had claimed which is that Thales was the first to do it.

  • From what I have read, what Thales did is note a pattern of partial eclipses in that area that were getting closer to a total eclipse. So he projected that the next instance would be even closer to a complete eclipse, or a total one. And he was right.
    – Oldcat
    Commented Nov 5, 2014 at 18:25

On July 30, 2014, Tony Freeth published his findings in PlosOne, that ancient Greeks were predicting lunar eclipses using the Antikythera Mechanism some time between 250BC and 1BC. Aside from predicting dates, this remarkable device was also able to predict magnitude, color, and obscuration.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.