# How long did it take to build earth dikes with low-tech tools?

Let's say you're in charge of a group of laborers anywhere from the Iron Age to the Middle Ages.

Your job is to build a dike made of earth, a couple of meters high and presumably about the same width (since the angle of repose of shoveled earth isn't very steep). You have shovels and any other tools of the era.

How many man-days of labor does it take per meter of dike?

Primary sources would be best, but modern reconstructions using historical techniques would be acceptable.

• Welcome to History @rwallace. Unfortunately, I cannot see how this is related to History. If you want to keep the question open then I suggest making any History aspect that you have in mind clear. Apr 13, 2015 at 22:19
• @rwallace, I've edited the question to try and put it in a historical context. If my edit changed the question too much, feel free to edit it further -- as long as it stays tied to history.
– Joe
Apr 14, 2015 at 2:42
• Andrew Jackson was able to build a 20' wide and 4' deep ditch with a rampart wall that was 600 yards long in a single day in the swampy bayous with 2-3k troops before the battle of new orleans. i realize that is not iron nor middle ages, but the tools used then were pretty much the same. Sep 14, 2021 at 21:13
• When you have nearly unlimited labor to throw at the problem?
– MCW
Sep 14, 2021 at 21:46

Julius Caesar is alleged to have completed a 25 mile double circumvallation (11 miles inner, 14 miles outer) of Alesia in 30 days, with approximately 50,000 men - though at all times, of course, some of those had to be on guard duty. This circumvallation would have been a 8 foot or so ditch in front of a similar mound, on which a 12-15 foot wooden wall was built, with fortified camps acting as keeps and with towers at regular intervals.

If we assume half the men on guard duty at a time, with 12 hour days, that is

``````5,280 * 25 = 132,000 feet of fortifications
``````

built in

``````25,000 * 30 * 12 = 9,000,000 man-hours
``````

or approximately

``````9,000,000 / 132,000 = 68
``````

labour-hours per foot of fortifications.

Other than the fortified camps, which would have been assembled initially with materials from the Legionnaires regular pack, all materials would have been manufactured for single use at this one location. Most of the artillery (catapults, mangonels, and such) would likely have come from the Caesar's baggage train. Also the head count is strictly fighting men, and camp followers capable of assisting in the construction might have been an equal number - though none of them would have had to provide guard duty. This provide an upper limit to accompany the lower limit above, of perhaps 200 labour-hours per foot of fortification, giving a estimated range of 65-200 labour hours per foot of fortification.

The process of moving earth with a shovel or other manual tools hasn't change much on the centuries. In fact, the amount of man-hours needed to manually excavate or lay a cubic meter of earth depends on a lot of factors, including the kind of earth (loose-hard), the form of excavation, how far is the trench and the dike (assuming you are taking earth from the trench to lay it in the dike) and so, and I think the century would be a minor factor. In fact, what is succinctly described in Wikipedia:Roman_military_personal_equipment#Entrenching_tools doesn't seem very different of the tools that we would use nowadays to do manually the same task.

In the building industry there are data banks with estimates of manpower and material needed to perform a lot of tasks - those used to be books, now they are computer databases. Those banks still include some manual earth moving tasks.

To give an order of magnitude, I've checked a couple of manual tasks in a data bank I have at hand:

• Manual excavation of trenches, up to 1.5 meters deep, leaving the earth at the side of the trench, in loose soil: 1.8 man-hours per m3.