1

At 1 minute 3 seconds juncture of the TV movie All the King's Men, Captain Frank Reginald Beck, MVO is depicted leading an infantry charge, while wielding some kind of whip or baton or stick in his right hand.

Is this factual? If so, why would such a rod help or matter, in the fray?

4

I don't have any documentation around the specific case of Capt Beck, but if not literally true may well be "based in fact" as there are documented examples of officers carrying odd things into battle. Examples from WW2 include Major Tatham-Warter and his umbrella and Jack Churchill and his sword and longbow. More generally, the "typical" armament of an officer in the late 19th century and into the Great War was a pistol. From a practical perspective, in Flanders or at Gallipoli this is about as useful as a riding crop compared to a rifle or machinegun.

  • In WWI, an Officer's (or Senior NCO's) pistol wasn't there to shoot at the enemy as much as ensuring their own troops didn't balk (at topping the trenches). – CGCampbell Jun 4 '15 at 16:20
  • @CGCampbell Thanks. Any evidence? – Greek - Area 51 Proposal Jun 21 '15 at 1:35
  • If I had solid evidence beyond anecdotal (diaries, etc) this might not be a comment. – CGCampbell Jun 21 '15 at 12:12
4

The object shown in the movie is a regular walking stick with hooked head and a metal point. It was likely an idiosyncrasy of the man, and used to project some normalcy during the madness of war.

While possibly used as a weapon it is far more likely to have been a moral prop, as was not uncommon for British army officers. I could not find a reference that he really carried it. The scene depicted looks rather romanticised so does not lend any support.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.