Where did Hitler get the funds to invest in economic revitalization programs such as the autobahn and weapons' production when the German economy was in a depression?

  • 12
    He didn't, he did the national equivalent of using one credit card to pay off another.
    – Semaphore
    Sep 8, 2015 at 15:17
  • 8
    @Semaphore too bad the SE users frown on one-line answers. Sep 8, 2015 at 18:36
  • 1
    The same way every state ever pays for their stuff despite having too little money. (How could the US finance their wars during the 2007+X financial crisis?)
    – Raphael
    Sep 9, 2015 at 10:22
  • 1
    @Mindwin Well, that's why it was a comment :p
    – Semaphore
    Sep 9, 2015 at 12:41
  • 1
    Forced labour. It's amazing what you can achieve if you don't pay your employees properly.
    – Ne Mo
    Oct 29, 2015 at 11:09

5 Answers 5


The funds for the Autobahn project came from the Reinhardt Program, a credit finance scheme originated by Kurt von Schleicher. The contractors who built the highways were paid not in Reichsmark, but with debentures issued by the Reich Finance Ministry which could be redeemed at a discount at certain banks that formed a work creation consortium. These banks, in turn, could redeem the credits with the Reichsbank. The Reichsbank, which collected pools of these instruments, was promised that they would be honored by the Reich Finance Ministry on a fixed schedule guaranteed by taxes.

So, in essence, the Autobahn was financed with a sort of a bond.

The first Reinhardt Program which was used for the initial finance of the Autobahn had only a limited amount credits issued under it. In 1934, further work creation projects were instituted under a second Reinhardt program. In this program, the credits were generated the same way, but instead of delivering them to the contractors, they were just paid directly as Reichsmarks. Also, the program was reduced to just being a subsidy to private investment, not full financing. The Reich Finance Ministry (RFM) was still responsible for reimbursing the Reichsbank for the amounts incurred.

You also asked about armaments. Financing re-armament was not considered "economic revitalization" by the German leaders. Unlike the two Reinhardt programs, which were highly publicized and involved popular participation, the rearmament financing was undertaken relatively quietly, almost secretely. To fund rearmament, they adopted the same basic scheme from the first Reinhardt program: a controlling agency issued bonds, these bonds were delivered to the industrialists as payment, the Reichsbank redeemed the bonds, and the government promised to reimburse the Reichsbank on a fixed schedule from tax proceeds.

The agency used in this case was not a government agency, as in the Reinhardt program, but a newly created shadow entity called Metallurgische Forschungsgesellschaft (Mefo or MEFO) which was capitalized by the several large industrial concerns, such as the Krupp steel works, that stood to benefit by it. Contractors were paid in Mefo bills which could be cashed in with the Reichsbank at any time, but were often held because they paid interest.

Further information on the economy of Germany during the 1933-1938 period can be found in the books "The Wages of Destruction" by Adam Tooze, "Hitler's Economy: Nazi Work Creation Programs, 1933-1936" by Dan Silverman and "War and Economy in the Third Reich" by R.J. Overy.

  • ...each hop of which was likely rife with corruption. This has a distinct resemblance to the early history of Volkswagen under the Nazis.
    – T.E.D.
    Sep 8, 2015 at 17:52
  • 7
    Could you elaborate on why the contractors go along with such plan? The fundamental question that was raised is "How did Hitler create something (the autobahn) out of nothing (no money)?". The current answer states that it's funded by bond, but that only raises the same question: "How did Hitler create something (trust that the bonds have values) out of nothing?"
    – Heisenberg
    Sep 8, 2015 at 20:04
  • 26
    @Heisenberg I've heard the guy could talk - convinced a lot of people of some fairly significant things, led to a bunch of people dying rather horrific deaths, and still some people thought he was a great guy - ah the power of words... Sep 8, 2015 at 20:12
  • 3
    @Heisenberg The government provides guarantees (and, but that's just incidental, a motorway program is a sensible investment). It will still be there in 10 years time and it has multiple way to obtain money (raising taxes, assets). That's not nothing, that's exactly what the banks miss to connect money they need to put somewhere and investments in an era of uncertainty.
    – Relaxed
    Sep 9, 2015 at 9:19
  • 3
    The opposite view is predicated on the assumption that creditors can be arbitrarily demanding and just sit on their money but that's not true. When the stock market collapses, private investment are risky, etc. they are desperate for some place to put their money. (Which is not to say the nazis fully understood this or did it in the best possible way but the point is that banks do potentially get something out of it.)
    – Relaxed
    Sep 9, 2015 at 9:19

Actually, both the building of the Autobahn and the (somewhat more conservative but still loan-based) initiatives for their financing predate the 1933-onward reign of the NSDAP. They merely continued what others had begun.

And the funds were not that impressive either; in 1935 they amounted to only 4% of government spending. Rebuilding the military, by comparison, got 24%.

But Tyler was on the right track; the Hitler administration got a large part of their funds from uncovered bills. That they were, in fact, uncovered, was hidden by a variety of schemes.

The most prominent of these schemes (accounting for over 30% of their military spending) were Mefo bills, a promissory note. The dummy company MEFO, which only had one million RM of own capital, would pass out these bills as payment for contractors. They were formally redeemable by the Reichsbank after five years, and came with a healthy 4% interest so there was reason to hold them. Plus, banks could hide them in their balances, so shareholders would not be aware of how indebted everyone actually was.

(By 1938, the total amount of Mefo-bills amounted to ~12 (short) billion RM...)

The Autobahn, however, was to a (very) large part financed by forcing the unemployment insurance to loan their funds to the government at very low interest. Eventually this amounted to well over 3 (short) billion RM.

Once the war started, German banks were effectively put under control of the government, at which point the whole thing was moot anyway.

  • The construction of the Autobahn was not financed with Mefo bills. It was financed, as I said, by credits issued by the Reich Finance Ministry (the RFM), a completely different organization than the one that issued Mefo bills. Sep 9, 2015 at 13:13
  • 2
    @TylerDurden: That's the thing with a government finanzing X by Y. In the end, they are financing a sum of X's by a sum of Y's. Ring-fenced counterfinancing is a myth, IMHO, and the Mefo-bills are the largest (and most well-documented) tool of 3rd Reich financing. I did a bit more digging though: Most of the money actually came from the funds of the unemployment insurance, which had to provide low-interest loans of over 3 (short) billion (!) RM. Increasing mineral oil tax did another (much smaller) part. I'll edit my answer.
    – DevSolar
    Sep 9, 2015 at 13:53
  • 1
    @TylerDurden: Besides, the question asked about programs such as the Autobahn (which I missed myself until right now), so I think mentioning the Mefo bills is quote on-topic.
    – DevSolar
    Sep 10, 2015 at 13:52

Wow, great answers by @Tyler and @DevSolar so far. One more point to add

Once the war started, German banks were effectively put under control of the government, at which point the whole thing was moot anyway.

Not only the banks.

As of The Vampire Economy - Doing Business Under Fascism, the people who bought the bonds were not totally free to do so anyways. The author says that, essentially, this was not a free market anymore, with

  • no free acess to base materials for production,
  • no free acess to international markets,
  • no free acess to local finance options.

As an example (page 11):

Herr V. [one of the largest landowners in Eastern Prussia] learned only through bitter experience that there was no longer any court or official to protect him, and he began to fear that his estates might be expropriated. He visited his former banker, Herr Z., to whom he confessed:

I want to invest my liquid funds in a way which is safe, where they can't be touched by the State or the Party. In the old days I always refused to speculate, to buy stocks. Now I would not mind. However, I would like best to buy a farm in South-West Africa. Perhaps my next crop will be a failure and I will be blamed, accused of "sabotage," and replaced in the management of my estates by a Party ad- ministrator. I want to be prepared for such a contingency and have a place to go should the Party decide to take away my property.

The banker was compelled to inform his landowner friend that there was no such way out. The State would not allow him to leave Germany with more than ten marks. South-West Africa was closed to him; he would have to stay where he was.


MEFO was already mentioned, but the most important point is missing: Hitler was a project of the German "Elites", as Hitler laid out his plans to go to war very early - first of all in Mein Kampf, then in his speech before the "Industrieclub" in Düsseldorf. Hitler of course also promised to get them rid of the communists and the labour unions, which he did. He also persecuted the Jews, who often had to sell their assets below market value to German companies ("Aryanization"). This eliminated competition and brought opportunities to gain cheap assets. They had no reason to distrust their own scheme.

Without WW II, this scheme would have collapsed eventually - but even this would not have been too big a problem for the big corporation - the tanks they made had already been paid.
War of course averted this, as Germany could simply plunder the countries she had conquered, as well as to force people into slave labour, which benefitted the industry as well.

  • 3
    This seems to be talking about Hitler's policies in general without really answer the question of where the funds came from.
    – Semaphore
    Sep 10, 2015 at 10:40
  • As I said: DevSolar already explained where the funds came from. But the question is why it worked. If Greece would try the same, it would not work, as no one would accept greek MEFO bills. The German industry was part of the plan, and just hoped that Germany would go to war before going bankrupt.
    – Veredomon
    Sep 10, 2015 at 13:47

You all danced around the smoke and mirrors of fiat currency and fractional banking. Repayment was promised based on the captured regional natural resources in each country the Nazis invaded and everything of value stolen from anyone in those countries as well as the valuables and assets of the Jews they dispossessed in Germany, including those of the Rothschild Bank.

  • 3
    Your answer could be improved with additional supporting information. Please edit to add further details, such as citations or documentation, so that others can confirm that your answer is correct. You can find more information on how to write good answers in the help center.
    – Community Bot
    Dec 12, 2023 at 10:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.