There are quotes, attributed to a king of Mesopotamia, and to Socrates and Hesiod, about how lazy the youth are, and how things were better when they were kids. Unfortunately, the veracity of the quotes are dubious at best, and one was satire.

So what are the first example of quotes which express beliefs such as these, but in seriousness instead of jest, and which are correctly attributed?

  • 5
    A satire is most often refer to a common problem or opinion, so just because the satire is the surviving document, it doesn't mean that it wasn't a wide spread opinion (that is satirizes).
    – Greg
    Apr 3, 2016 at 7:01
  • 1
    What reason do you have for doubting the ones you already know of? It certainly is going to have been being said for about the last 50 thousand years.
    – Oldcat
    Apr 7, 2016 at 20:06
  • 3
    Because, Oldcat, the "Mesopotamian" quote was probably made up about a century ago and attributed to the king, Same with "Hesiod's" quote. I'm looking for something older than that.
    – readerboy7
    Apr 9, 2016 at 17:20
  • An interesting I think related question is, We are accustomed to thinking of things progressing, technologically etc. but i think this is a fairly modern concept. i know there was a time when people looked at the ancients and hoped to recapture their knowledge. Fermat hints at this. I wonder when people started to look forward rather than backward. I am sure by early 19th century with the advent of steam power people expected more such advances.
    – Jeff
    Feb 2, 2017 at 17:46
  • 1
    A link about the famous Mesopotamian quote ( quoteinvestigator.com/2012/10/22/world-end ), tracing its origins to a forged 19th century quote.
    – Pere
    Feb 2, 2017 at 18:34

5 Answers 5


600 - 300 BC

The counts of the indictment are luxury, bad manners, contempt for authority, disrespect to elders, and a love for chatter in place of exercise. …

Children began to be the tyrants, not the slaves, of their households. They no longer rose from their seats when an elder entered the room; they contradicted their parents, chattered before company, gobbled up the dainties at table, and committed various offences against Hellenic tastes, such as crossing their legs. They tyrannised over the paidagogoi and schoolmasters.

  • “Schools of Hellas: an Essay on the Practice and Theory of Ancient Greek Education from 600 to 300 BC”, Kenneth John Freeman
    1907 (paraphrasing of Hellenic attitudes towards the youth in 600 - 300 BC)*

“[Young people] are high-minded because they have not yet been humbled by life, nor have they experienced the force of circumstances.
They think they know everything, and are always quite sure about it.”

  • Rhetoric Part 12 On Youthful Character, Aristotle
    4th Century BC

100 BC

“The beardless youth… does not foresee what is useful, squandering his money.”

Our sires' age was worse than our grandsires'.
We, their sons, are more worthless than they;
so in our turn we shall give the world a progeny yet more corrupt.

1300 AD

In all things I yearn for the past. Modern fashions seem to keep on growing more and more debased. I find that even among the splendid pieces of furniture built by our master cabinetmakers, those in the old forms are the most pleasing.

And as for writing letters, surviving scraps from the past reveal how superb the phrasing used to be. The ordinary spoken language has also steadily coarsened. People used to say "raise the carriage shafts" or "trim the lamp wick," but people today say "raise it" or "trim it." When they should say, "Let the men of the palace staff stand forth!" they say, "Torches! Let's have some light!" Instead of calling the place where the lectures on the Sutra of the Golden Light are delivered before the emperor "the Hall of the Imperial Lecture," they shorten it to "the Lecture Hall," a deplorable corruption, an old gentleman complained.

  • Tsurezuregusa (Essays in Idleness), Yoshida Kenkō
    1330 - 1332 AD

Later than these, there are many examples of this thought being echoed from the 17th century onwards.


* Frequently misattributed to Socrates, probably due to its similarity to several passages in Plato's Republic:

when the young are to be silent before their elders; how they are to show respect to them by standing and making them sit; what honour is due to parents; what garments or shoes are to be worn; the mode of dressing the hair; deportment and manners in general.

And though only the best of them will be appointed by their predecessors, still they will be unworthy to hold their fathers' places, and when they come into power as guardians, they will soon be found to fall in taking care of us, the Muses, first by under-valuing music; which neglect will soon extend to gymnastic; and hence the young men of your State will be less cultivated.


 • http://www.bbc.com/capital/story/20171003-proof-that-people-have-always-complained-about-young-adults
 • http://mentalfloss.com/article/52209/15-historical-complaints-about-young-people-ruining-everything
 • https://quoteinvestigator.com/2010/05/01/misbehaving-children-in-ancient-times/

  • 6
    I thought 2001 was recent, but "one zap of a TV dial" sounds just as ancient as the stuff about the Greeks.
    – SPavel
    May 3, 2018 at 21:20
  • 9
    Appreciate the effort going into this, but the question is for the oldest example; it seems quite unnecessary to list dozens of very recent ones. Perhaps you could trim it a bit or make this a bit less intrusive.
    – Semaphore
    May 4, 2018 at 13:16
  • @Semaphore I've done so - can you remove this comment now since it is no longer relevant?
    – iacob
    Apr 16, 2021 at 10:19
  • Appreciate the flagging for potentially obsolete comments. So few bother to do that! However, I'm still seeing most of the text in this answer devoted to things that, as per the first third of this answer, don't qualify. Is there some reason the first third may be wrong, thus perhaps needing to fall back to the other two?
    – T.E.D.
    Apr 26, 2021 at 12:38

You have great predecessors in your question

  • You are not the first to notice the habit of Humans to complain about better times from the past being gone. Horace, in Ars Poetica, already called one of these nostalgic people "laudator temporis acti se puero".

  • A useful source might be the book from French scholar Lucien Jerphagnon, C'était mieux avant, that collects and comments exactly the kind of quotes you are looking for. Alas, I cannot find extracts from the book online. If you can read French, it might be worth purchasing it.

Specific quote about children not listening to their parents

~2225 BCE, Akkad

This answer by @00prometheus from Skeptics.SE traces an article describing an inscription attributed to King Naram Sin of Chaldea, 3800 years B.C (much older than anything mentioned until now - but this is a dubious dating, read @Avery's remarks later on), that goes:

We have fallen upon evil times
and the world has waxed very old and wicked.
Politics are very corrupt.
Children are no longer respectful to their parents.

I'll let more knowledgeable contributors than myself discuss its authenticity. @Avery challenges this attribution and offers a possible explanation in his own answer. Most probably, the quote comes from king Naram Sin of Akkad, in the 23rd century BCE.

Similar complains

~2000 BCE, Egypt

  • Amenemhat I was a pharaoh from the twelvth dynasty, during the 20th century BCE. He left instructions to his son Senusret, in which he notably describes his own assassination (quite a litterary feat, btw). The description contains rhetoric questions that seem to compare a deceptive present with a better past taken as reference:

Had women ever raised troops?
Had rebels ever been nurtured within the home?
Had water ever been opened up, while the canals were being dug,
And with locals at their tasks?
No disaster had come up behind me since my birth.
Never had the like happened - my moment was that of doer of valiant deeds.

The authorship of these Instructions of Amenemhat is obviously unclear, but some copies have reached us from the reign of Amenhotep I, so the text itself is at least 25 centuries old.

We can also debate if the (probably) contemporary Prophecy_of_Neferti, that describes Egypt divided in chaos after the collapse of the First Kingdom, and waiting to get unified again by, guess whom, Amenemhat I, counts as a nostalgic, before-was-better, complain.

~2500 BCE, Egypt

  • Even older, the Maxims of Ptahhotep, from the 25th century BCE, contain praise for obedient youngs, even if they don't seem to complain that youngs would be less obedient now than before:

"How wonderful is a son who obeys his father!"
"How happy he is of whom it is said: 'A son is kind-natured when he knows how to listen.'"

  • 3
    The Naram Sin quote is interesting and is probably the earliest specific mention of children not listening to their parents, but Naram Sin was much later 2254 – 2218, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naram-Sin_of_Akkad Sumerian civilisation itself only started around 3000BC.
    – ChrisGuest
    Jul 25, 2020 at 2:36


I have not studied the originals of these sources, but I was able to find this discussion attributing the following text to Plato's Republic (380 BC):

The quote may have come from Plato's Republic Book 4, where Socrates is quoted saying the following regarding things that he thinks have been neglected: "I mean such things as these: ? when the young are to be silent before their elders; how they are to show respect to them by standing and making them sit; what honour is due to parents; what garments or shoes are to be worn; the mode of dressing the hair; deportment and manners in general. You would agree with me? ? Yes."

In addition, this discussion mentioned the play Clouds by Aristophanes (423 BC), where a speech has the following text:

. . .

A boy must hold his tongue among his elders.

. . .

Greed was abhorred, it was taboo to snatch
Radish tops, aniseed, or parsley before your elders,
Or to nibble kickshaws and giggle and twine one's feet.

. . .

So, you shall learn to hate the Agora,
And shun the baths and feel ashamed of smut;

. . .

And to get up and give your seat to your elders,
And not to behave towards your parents rudely

. . .

The play is a comedy, but not in the modern sense of the word. I am not sure if it is meant as satire or not.

This article quotes Horace (Book III of Odes, 20 BC):

Our sires' age was worse than our grandsires'. We, their sons, are more worthless than they; so in our turn we shall give the world a progeny yet more corrupt.

Modern (verifiable)

The above article also has links to downloadable primary sources. The oldest of them is from The Wise-man's Forecasts Against the Evil Time from 1624:

Youth were never more sawcie, yea never more savagely saucie . . . the ancient are scorned, the honourable are contemned, the magistrate is not dreaded.

So if the ancient sources don't sit right by you, you can at least sleep soundly knowing that old people have considered us young'ins "savagely saucy" for 400 years.

  • 6
    I'd add that the 5th/4th Commandment ("Honor thy Father and Mother") likely would not have achieved such lofty status if the author hadn't had a problem with younger people not doing that. Scholars believe Exodus was written around the 6th century BC.
    – T.E.D.
    Feb 2, 2017 at 19:17
  • @T.E.D. I am inclined to agree, but it's also possible the intent was to commit existing values to stone, as it were. Less "darn kids these days" and more "let's make sure kids forevermore emulate the wonderful youth we have today." Either is possible, so I don't want to tip the scales either way.
    – SPavel
    Feb 2, 2017 at 20:05
  • 2
    You are absolutely correct that we can't know this (which is why this is only in a comment). However, one would imagine any existing values that weren't being regularly transgressed they would not have even thought to prohibit.
    – T.E.D.
    Feb 2, 2017 at 20:50
  • 3
    @T.E.D. : if Exodus fits, then the Maixms of Ptahhotep (2 millenia older) should fit too : "How wonderful is a son who obeys his father!" ; "How happy he is of whom it is said: 'A son is kind-natured when he knows how to listen.'" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Maxims_of_Ptahhotep
    – Evargalo
    May 4, 2018 at 11:52

There is this from Ecclesiastes:

Say not, “Why were the former days better than these?” For it is not from wisdom that you ask this.

So although he is admonishing not to make this statement, we do see that such sentiments existed, from which he steers us away.


If we count statements made about previous generations, these go back to some of the oldest literature. There’s a speech like this in The Iliad, set in the mouth of an ancient character of the epic, about how much greater an earlier generation was and young men should be more respectful to their elders. You could read this as Homer saying that old men have always felt that way, or that the generations have been in decline since time immemorial.

I am older than either of you; therefore be guided by me. Moreover I have been the familiar friend of men even greater than you are, and they did not disregard my counsels. Never again can I behold such men as Pirithous and Dryas shepherd of his people, or as Caeneus, Exadius, godlike Polyphemus, and Theseus son of Aegeus, peer of the immortals. These were the mightiest men ever born upon this earth: mightiest were they, and when they fought the fiercest tribes of mountain savages they utterly overthrew them. I came from distant Pylos, and went about among them, for they would have me come, and I fought as it was in me to do. Not a man now living could withstand them, but they heard my words, and were persuaded by them. So be it also with yourselves, for this is the more excellent way.

And neither Achilles nor Agamemnon does, leading to disaster.

There are several condemnations of entire generations in the Hebrew Bible, although they are difficult to date. The history running from Deuteronomy to II Kings (which most scholars date between the reign of Josiah in the late seventh century BCE and the Babylonian Exile in the sixth century BCE) sees ancient Jewish history as a cycle of successive generations becoming debauched and their children repenting, as in the second chapter of Judges:

After that whole generation had been gathered to their ancestors, another generation grew up who knew neither the Lord nor what he had done for Israel. Then the Israelites did evil in the eyes of the Lord [...] In his anger against Israel the Lord gave them into the hands of raiders who plundered them. He sold them into the hands of their enemies all around, whom they were no longer able to resist. Whenever Israel went out to fight, the hand of the Lord was against them to defeat them, just as he had sworn to them. They were in great distress.

Then the Lord raised up judges, who saved them out of the hands of these raiders. Yet they would not listen to their judges but prostituted themselves to other gods and worshiped them. They quickly turned from the ways of their ancestors, who had been obedient to the Lord’s commands. Whenever the Lord raised up a judge for them, he was with the judge and saved them out of the hands of their enemies as long as the judge lived; for the Lord relented because of their groaning under those who oppressed and afflicted them. But when the judge died, the people returned to ways even more corrupt than those of their ancestors, following other gods and serving and worshiping them. They refused to give up their evil practices and stubborn ways.

Several of the Hebrew prophets inveigh against their contemporaries. One word for those diatribes is still “Jeremiads,” after the prophet from the seventh century BCE. For example, Jeremiah 16:

It is because your ancestors forsook me, [...] and did not keep my law. But you have behaved more wickedly than your ancestors. See how all of you are following the stubbornness of your evil hearts instead of obeying me. So I will throw you out of this land into a land neither you nor your ancestors have known, and there you will serve other gods day and night, for I will show you no favor.

Jeremiah, though, does not think it is only the young who are less pious and moral than their parents, but all living Israelites.

Job does this on a more personal level, in chapters 29 and 30, but is more difficult to date.

Oh, for the days when I was in my prime, when God’s intimate friendship blessed my house, when the Almighty was still with me [....]

But now they mock me, men younger than I, whose fathers I would have disdained to put with my sheep dogs. [...]

And now those young men mock me in song; I have become a byword among them. They detest me and keep their distance; they do not hesitate to spit in my face.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.