The Norse are the only people that - we can verify today - had pre-columbian contact with the New World. While it's clear that their settlements didn't last, it does appear that they interacted with the native people of North America. What I find interesting (and bit puzzling) is that their contact did not result in the spread of smallpox or other infectious diseases that, in post-columbian contact, led to the deaths of millions of Amerindians.

In order to answer the question above I thought it would be important to know how prevalent smallpox (or any other diseases that Amerindians succumbed to) were among the Vikings around the year 1000 A.D.? Are there records of plagues around that time period or other indications that the Norse were equally as likely to carry smallpox as say the Spanish?

  • You know, this is an issue that's skittered across my brain a time or two as well. I have theories, but never looked deeply into it. Good question.
    – T.E.D.
    Jun 14, 2016 at 19:05

2 Answers 2


Infectious diseases require a certain critical mass of people to become endemic in a population. Smaller than that, and they burn themselves out by making every susceptible person either immune or dead. The smaller and more isolated the population, the more quickly this happens.

Based on what I'm seeing in Epidemics and Pandemics: Their Impacts on Human History, Iceland appears to be below this threshold for Smallpox. It had an outbreak in 1670, and then a generation later (1707) another carried over from Denmark.

To get from there to the Americas, it would also have to jump from there to Greenland in the short window (roughly 2 years it appears from the records) that its floating around Iceland, and then from there to the mainland, and again from there to the Inuit populations. Inuit did not live in big settlements, so it would have to somehow then get transmitted from small hunting tribe to tribe many times over, crossing several more cultural gradients, until it hit a large city-dwelling culture further south to become endemic in.

I've seen multiple claims that Smallpox hit the Greenland settlement in the early 1400's. The Greatest Killer: Smallpox in History by Donald R. Hopkins for example. I'm not sure what those claims are based on1. This would be right around the end of that settlement, which by chronology alone would strongly imply the disease was a factor in its demise.2

1 - Anyone?

2 - You could also, purely by this chronology, postulate that this may in fact be what caused the end of the classic ("middle") Mississippians. I'd need to see some actual evidence before thinking this leap reasonable though.

  • Since it only took one person for it to spread to Iceland it's at least possible that it could've happened but not very likely. Given that we were able to find, what was a small Viking colony, it seems like there would be some archaeological evidence of a dip in population among the Inuits, had they been affected by small pox. I'm no expert of course so it might far more difficult than I'm imagining.
    – otteheng
    Jun 14, 2016 at 20:53
  • Are there any other diseases that the Vikings could've carried that would've been deadly to the Amerindians? Perhaps something that they would've carried and considered a run of the mill sickness (low-mortality rate).
    – otteheng
    Jun 14, 2016 at 21:01
  • Well, as my footnote implies, there is certainly evidence of something happening to the Mississippians at about that time. A city of 0.6-40 thousands was abandoned a few hundred years later. Disease has been one of many theories. There's no way to prove one way or the other that smallpox (or any other disease) was involved though.
    – T.E.D.
    Jun 14, 2016 at 21:07
  • 2
    @TomAu - That's true for a lot of viruses, but I'm not sure about Smallpox. I couldn't find info that it has problems with cold (I did look), and the story about it surviving the voyage to Iceland in the dead (and chucked-overboard) guy's clothing argues otherwise. Its reported to have been more of a problem in the winter and spring months, which seems to argue that at least a little cold actually helps it.
    – T.E.D.
    Jun 15, 2016 at 15:32
  • 1
    Different strains, different virulence, and for some, they just didn't exist then medicalxpress.com/news/… ? Jul 7, 2019 at 22:25

Many deadly diseases appeared late in Scandinavia; for example, the first recorded smallpox epidemic (variola) in Iceland was in 1241, arriving via the area of Denmark. Smallpox wasn't really a severe problem in Europe until the start of the Crusades (just at the end of the Viking Age), when returning crusaders brought the disease home with them. ("The History of Smallpox and its Spread Around the World". Ch. 5. Smallpox and its Eradication. Eds. Frank Fenner, Donald A. Henderson, Isao Arita, Zdeněk Ježek and Ivan Danilovich Ladnya. Geneva: World Health Organization. pp. 209-244. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/smallpox/9241561106.pdf)

Similarly, typhus ("spotted fever", Rickettsia prowazekii) doesn't seem to have spread throughout Europe until 1489, when Spanish soldiers who fought the Turks in Cyprus brought the disease to Spain. (James G. Olson. Epidemic Typhus: A Forgotten But Lingering Threat". Ch. 5. Emerging Infections 3. Eds. W.M. Scheld, W.A. Craig, and J.M. Hughes. Washington D.C.: ASM Press. 1999. pp. 67-72.)

Cholera is believed to have originated in the subcontinent of India. The disease may have been described by the Greek physician Hippocrates (460-377 BC), but the great cholera pandemics didn't occur until the 19th c. (Antonis A. Kousoulis. "Etymology of Cholera". Emerg Infect Dis. March 2012).

Prior to the scientific understanding of bacteria, and illness that could spread amongst people or animals could be considered "a plague". Hard evidence as to what diseases may have infected people in Viking Age Scandinavia are spotty. Tuberculosis, endemic in bovine populations, can be shown to have affected both humans and livestock in Viking Age Scandinavian settlements via the evidence of bone lesions.

Leprosy probably spread to Scandinavia during the Viking Age, when large numbers of slaves from Ireland were imported. Leprosy was known in Ireland as early as the 7th c. and widespread in Ireland by the 10th c. Certainly, both the Gulaþing Law and Borgarþing Law state that "a promise of marriage is not binding if one of the partners was found to be leprous". (Thomas M. Vogelsang. "Leprosy in Norway". Medical History 9:1 (Jan. 1965). pp 29-35. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1033440/pdf/medhist00156-0037.pdf)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.