2

There's a cliche in western cinematography about a gang of bad guys terrorizing a small town. My question is: did such things really happen?

Thought behind my question is that settlers might be tough people, ready for self-defense, and I'd expect almost any person to have a gun, so a dozen of bandits wouldn't have any advantage. But I have no knowledge about real frontier life, so maybe there are historical records known about armed gangs terrorizing settlements.

  • 2
    I'm pretty sure that wherever there are humans, there are gangs terrorizing them. I think that's the point of Weber's observation that government has a monopoly on the use of force; government is just a glorified gang with accountability and legitimacy. If there were humans, there were gangs terrorizing them. – Mark C. Wallace Aug 4 '16 at 13:36
5

Lots. Probably the most famous and historically important incidents happened during the ("bleeding") Kansas border war.

Congress made a deal where Kansas would be allowed to vote on whether or not to allow slavery when it entered the union. Most of the territorial settlers at this time came from northern areas and had little interest in slavery. However, the slaveholding states felt creating more of them was vital for their survival. One of them (Missouri) was quite close to hand. Politically motivated violence between the two soon followed.

The "Free-State" town of Lawrence, KS was sacked by a "posse" of 800 pro-slavery settlers on May 21, 1856. In retaliation (and disgust at the non-violent political tactics of his fellow Free-Staters), John Brown formed his own company, and massacred 5 pro-slavery settlers at Pottawatomie Creek.

4 months later a gang of roughly 400 Missourians attacked the Free State town of Osawatomie. John Brown's gang tried to defend it with about a tenth of their manpower, but was brushed aside. The town was looted and burned.

There are some intriguing tales from my own town's history. Tulsa was technically (iow: Legally) in Creek territory prior to statehood. One particularly prominent Creek family was the Perrymans, who had a large ranch south of town. Its difficult right now to find anything negative about them online, but I hear a lot of stories about how they didn't particularly respect the law of the white settlers in Tulsa, were powerful enough to get away with that, and some interesting "exploits" that would often ensue. I think the most interesting one I heard was a tale about a local minister who had the misfortune of saying something during a sermon that one of the Perrymans felt was a personal attack on his wife, and found himself challenged to a duel (there was no option of not accepting)*

* - I believe there are still a fair amount of Perrymans around these parts, so I should hasten to add that I am quite sure they are to a person fine upstanding citizens.

  • 2
    Hm. Bleeding Kansas story looks more like a civil war than outlaws vs settlers clash. – Usurer Aug 4 '16 at 14:31
  • @Usurer - It was kind of a bit of both. The POTUS at the time was pro-slavery too, and insisted on recognizing only the pro-slavery government, so the only times Federal troops got called in were in support of the pro-slavery forces. However, they were the ones carrying out most of the violence as well. So in theory many of these actions by the pro-slavery forces had either explicit or implicit government sanction. – T.E.D. Aug 4 '16 at 14:37
  • @Usurer - Still, at least in the case of Osawatomie, the perps were border ruffians from another state, who didn't want the town in question to exist. It was kind of like the end of Blazing Saddles, but serious. – T.E.D. Aug 4 '16 at 15:44
2

It's true that most settlers were tough, but some were tougher than others. The more legally minded among the tougher ones became sheriffs and "lawmen," while the ones with "illicit" inclinations became horse and cattle thieves, sometimes murdering those who got in their way. One famous fight between the two types took place near (not at) OK Corral in Tombstone, Arizona.

So there were documented instances of gangs of criminals terrorizing small, western towns in the nineteenth century. These incidents took place in "frontier" towns that were too far away from population centers to be eaisly protected by the army, or conventional police. And while many knew how to shoot, most men in such towns were more interested in "civilian" pursuits such as mining or cattle raising than defending themselves. What is true was that when "real" lawmen (dedicated fighters) came around, a few civilians like "Doc" Holliday would augment their ranks.

  • This sounds like a movie review ;-). – Peter Diehr Aug 4 '16 at 13:02
  • @PeterDiehr:"Art imitates life." – Tom Au Aug 4 '16 at 14:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.