3

In my limited reading about Henry II of England and his conflict with Thomas Becket, I don't remember learning about Holy Roman Emperor Henry V.

Is there any evidence that Henry II of England or Thomas Becket mentioned, thought about and/or referenced the Concordat of Worms (or the preceding conflicts)?

  • 2
    Don't you mean Henry II of England? – Steve Bird Sep 28 '16 at 17:12
  • Given that the conflict was "This led to a series of conflicts with the King, including that over the jurisdiction of secular courts over English clergymen, which accelerated antipathy between Becket and the king. " WikipediaThere is no reason why the Holy Roman Emperor would have been involved. – Mark C. Wallace Sep 28 '16 at 17:32
  • The concordat of worms is 1122; Becket is 1170. Worms governs investiture; the Constitutions of Clarendon concern the venue for trying a cleric accused of a crime. – Mark C. Wallace Sep 28 '16 at 17:37
  • 1
    I re-worded the question. I understand which came first but my original draft of the question wasn't clear. – dwstein Sep 28 '16 at 18:46
  • 1
    Much clearer; I still think the issues were disjoint - Becket was about the power of the English crown to manage English affairs. Worms was more about investiture. I may try to answer later, but this is on the outside edge of my competence. Interesting question. – Mark C. Wallace Sep 28 '16 at 19:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.