9

For instance, an air raid beyond bomber's range where after completing the mission the pilots should land or eject at the enemy land and surrender.

| improve this question | |
  • 8
    There were several examples where the missions were intended to end in neutral territory, with the crews involved surrendering to the neutral authorities, would those count? – Steve Bird Nov 9 '16 at 15:25
  • 2
    @SJuan76 I mean motivating the personnel to die may be more difficult (depending on culture) than surrender. – Anixx Nov 9 '16 at 15:30
  • 4
    It seems to be more usual to have a planned way out, as a hope, even if the personel are aware that it may well not work. The St Nazaire Raid is an example: only 228 of 611 attackers escaped, with 215 being made prisoner, and 169 dying. It was nonetheless considered a success. – John Dallman Nov 9 '16 at 15:42
  • 5
    @JohnDallman My first thought was St Nazaire too ... but you're right, it would be unusual to have absolutely no plan to attempt to escape. I also thought about the Dolittle raids, where the "escape plan" involved landing in occupied China, and hoping friendly forces would be the first to find them. I don't think that counts either, as they certainly wouldn't want to be captured by the Japanese. – Cooper Nov 9 '16 at 16:20
  • 7
    During Prague offensive Nazi army received an order to fight against the Soviet army and to retreat until they are able to surrender to "the allies". Is it OK? – Matt Nov 9 '16 at 17:25
2

During B-29 raids on Japan in 1944, in July and November, three B-29 bombers were forced to land in the Soviet Union either because of battle damage or fuel exhaustion after raids on Japanese positions in Manchuria. Because the Soviets were still not formally at war with Japan at this point, they interned the bombers' crews and happily accepted the windfall of the B-29s, a bomber they had unsuccessfully tried to get from the US.

Although these B-29 crews were not technically prisoners of an enemy, they were effectively out of the war. At this point in the Pacific Theater, becoming a prisoner of the Japanese was more than likely a death sentence, so internment in the Soviet Union was the only viable option to crews whose bombers could not return to their island bases.

| improve this answer | |
  • 4
    But were they instructed to surrender? – Mark C. Wallace♦ Nov 27 '16 at 15:25
  • The Sovjets weren't considered enemies at the time. – Ulf Tennfors Nov 27 '16 at 20:34
  • 1
    In this case, I would say, "turn themselves in," rather than "surrender." – Tom Au Nov 28 '16 at 12:27
  • Because the Soviet Union was not – Docholl1 Nov 29 '16 at 13:36
  • 1
    An even more older equivalent example would be the Doolittle raid in 1942 – user907860 Aug 15 '17 at 18:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.