1

I came into possession of this painting recently. It was displayed at the Winterthur museum in the 1800's...and was owned by Henry Francis Du Pont. There is paper taped to the back that says this work was painted around 1730. I'd like to identify the war and the uniform.

enter image description here

  • 2
    is there anything that makes you think that this is a military uniform? – user69715 Nov 11 '16 at 8:27
8

I agree that this jacket is not a military uniform. In fact it appears to be a very strange copy of the original painting, in which the buttons were completely different, and the coat was actually black(ish).

This is similar to the painting of Adam Winne , painted by Peter Vanderlyn, 1730, but with quite a few differences.

painting of Adam Winne

The painting is discussed at the Peabody Museum, Harvard web site when discussing puritan clothing:

The terms "modest" and "sober" speak to Puritan ideals that permeated colonial New England. Even small items like gold buttons did not escape Harvard’s watchful eyes. Both state and college laws forbade wearing "any Gold or Silver lace, or Gold and Silver Buttons."

The portrayal of the buttons in the above image seems quite different from the ones on the pages linked.

Both Peter Vanderlyn and Adam Winne were of Dutch descent, and living in the New York area in this time. Peter, in Albany Institute of History & Art: 200 Years of Collecting, is stated to have served three years in the Dutch Navy, and the clothes here do bear some semblance to some images of Dutch seamen. I can find no record(so far) of Adam, the subject of the painting, as having military experience, however.

4

I would not be so sure that this is a military uniform. It looks quite a lot like the statue of William Penn atop City Hall in Philadelphia (installed 1894) -- Penn, being a good Quaker, would not have served in the miliary.

William Penn

Winterthur is not so far from Philadelphia. My guess is that both works are based on a common original rendering of old Billy.

  • 7
    Early military uniforms for officers were simply a standardised form of the usual fashion for gentlemen of the time. The clothes in the painting could be a uniform, or they could simply be civilian clothing of the time. – John Dallman Nov 10 '16 at 19:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.