In the 16th century, Italian artists transitioned from painting on wooden panels to canvas. Is there a significant difference between 16th century Italian wood panel paintings and canvas paintings? Did the medium affect the texture of the final product? Why would an artist choose wood over canvas, or vice versa?

  • 1
    When you ask about a "significant difference" between wood and canvas are you asking about the production process or the qualities of the final product? Given that there are modern painters that still prefer wood to canvas, I think this may fall into "too subjective" territory. – Steve Bird Nov 18 '16 at 6:31
  • Sorry. Meant to ask about a difference in how the final product looks – Tony Nov 21 '16 at 4:41

Tackling the final one of your questions; i.e. why would they choose canvas over traditional wood? It seems that the main reason was one of portability.

The use of canvas as a support for oil paints allowed for easier transport of larger compositions, canvas is far lighter that oak panels, also a painting executed on canvas can be rolled up and transported more easily than wooden panels. Canvas became prominent in the Italian renaissance and it was widely used particularly in Venice. Venice was a wealthy trading port and, in the many workshops within the city, produced sails made from linen and other fabrics. In fine art linen is still considered to be the finest support for oil painting. Painting Techniques of the Renaissance

Making the paintings more portable allowed an artist to expand his potential market beyond his local area. It also made it easier to produce paintings "in the field" since the key materials were easier to get to the location.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.