In "The Wealth Of Nations", Adam Smith discusses the price of corn in ancient times. Apparently, books such as "Chronicon Preciosum: or An Account of English Money, the Price of Corn and Other Commodities, for the Last 600 Years" (written in 1707) document the price of corn. This would seem to indicate that Europeans were eating corn since at least 1107.

However, I "learned" in school that it was Columbus who brought corn to Europe after 1492.

When Adam Smith discusses "corn", is he referring to some other vegetable food which differs from "corn on the cob"? Or, did the Europeans in fact have corn before the time of Columbus?

  • 16
    It's linguistic difference. In British English, 'corn' is wheat (or sometimes any grain). What we in the US call corn is called 'maize' in Britain. – jamesqf Jan 14 '17 at 19:20
  • 3
    You should put that as an answer along with a cite. – Robert Columbia Jan 14 '17 at 19:24
  • Upvoting because of "learned". – kubanczyk Jan 15 '17 at 9:05
  • 1
  • 1
    In Caesar's books he constantly refers to harvesting corn or transporting corn for his troops. Obviously maize did not exist in those times. Corn for him was a generic term representing grain crops. – ed.hank Jan 16 '17 at 16:15
up vote 10 down vote accepted

The word corn, Wiktionary tells us, can mean:

  1. (Britain) The main cereal plant grown for its grain in a given region, such as oats in parts of Scotland and Ireland, and wheat or barley in England and Wales.
  2. (US, Canada, Australia) Maize, a grain crop of the species Zea mays.
  3. A grain or seed, especially of a cereal crop.
  4. A small, hard particle.

The word comes through Proto-Germanic from a Proto-IndoEuropean root from which the Latin granum also is derived; the latter gave us the English grain (etymonline). (Maize comes through Spanish from the Taíno word for Zea mays.)

So when the British Colonies in America were settled, corn meant essentially "cereal grain". The settlers found the natives growing Zea mays and called it "Indian corn" (Dictionary of Americanisms). Since it became a major crop of the settlers too, and they already had names for their familiar corns (wheat, rye, oats), the name "Indian corn" was soon shortened in America to simply "corn".

Whether Columbus's voyages returned with maize seed is unclear, but it was soon introduced to the Old World, being one element of the Columbian Exchange, the great transfer of organisms and ideas between the hemispheres which followed the establishment of European travel across the Atlantic Ocean. Columbus was aware of the Taíno cultivation of Zea mays, as there is a description of it from his second voyage in 1494:

It is a grain of very high yield, of the size of the lupine, of the roundness of the chick-pea, and yields a meal ground to a very fine powder; it is ground as is wheat and yields a bread of very good taste. (Histories of Maize)

Adam Smith's reference to corn in ancient times was certainly a reference to cereal grains, perhaps specifically to wheat, but that is not clear.

  • 1
    Just a note: the term "Indian corn" is still used in the US to describe varieties that have multi-colored kernels rather than the standard yellow. (Or the horrible white stuff they sell these days...) It's usually more for decoration than food. – jamesqf Aug 3 at 16:44

The explanations given are very good, however, there are history events, such as the Vikings who invaded England, also sailed to the northern regions of the American continent, and they could have taken the corn (Maize) to England.

Also there is a church in Scotland (Edinburg), built by the Saintclaires of Rosslyn, in the 1446, 46 years before the discovery of America. In this church there are build into its construction, curved figures of corn plants with corn cobs. So, were the English eating corn or maize, the american maize before 1492?

Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.

  • 3
    Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Your claim should at a minimum be accompanied by photographs and providence of construction prior to importation of maize from the Americas. It is then necessary to properly refute the well understood etymology of the English word corn. Without any of that, this is completely unsubstantiated opinion. – Pieter Geerkens Aug 3 at 16:02
  • 2
    Note:. New user, low rep. Let us extend courtesy while new users learn our culture. Welcome to the site. – Mark C. Wallace Aug 3 at 16:06
  • contains a brief description of the allegations about maize carvings in Roslyn chapel, Edinburgh that predate Columbus and has an image of the carvings. – PhillS Aug 3 at 20:10

Your Answer


By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.