2

Why did India release all Pakistani Soldiers captured during Indo Pak War 1965. As India captured thousands of Pakistani Soldiers Why did Indian Govt. Release all?

  • 12
    It's pretty normal to release prisoners of war once the war is over. What did you expect to happen instead? – nvoigt Feb 3 '17 at 9:07
  • 2
    The only example I know (in modern times, since, say 1900) when captured soldiers were not returned to their home country soon after the end of the war was WWII when captured German and Japanese soldiers were kept in USSR for about 10 years (they were released en masse in 1955-56). – Moishe Kohan Feb 3 '17 at 16:42
  • 4
    because Geneva Convention is a real thing! – siddhant Kumar Feb 8 '17 at 15:51
  • 1
    @siddhantKumar Oh I had forgotten that as signatories of GenCon, both India and Pakistan were obligated to include the clause for repatriation of PoWs in their peace treaty anyways so it wasn't just to get their own prisoners back, it was legal obligation of both parties. This completes my answer. Cheers – NSNoob Feb 9 '17 at 7:46
8

That was because of the Peace treaty which was signed between the two nations, moderated by Soviet Union.

Following were the figures for losses of both nations:

India: 3000 men killed or captured by Pakistanis (Neutral). 8200 men Killed or captured by Pakistanis (Pakistani claims). Indian admission is not available.

Pakistan: 3800 men killed or captured by Indians (Neutral). 5259 men killed or captured by Indians (Indian claims) . Pakistani admission is not available.

As you can see, both sides held prisoners of each other, which can be assumed to be more or less the same figure (If we disregard the claims of both sides and entertain only the neutral claims). Since the war was over, it was imperative for both nations to reach a treaty to end hostilities and repatriate the prisoners.

What you say is true, India had captured presumably thousands of Pakistani soldiers. What you fail to note however, Pakistan had also taken presumably thousands of Indian soldiers prisoners.

Through mediation of Soviet Premier, Alexei Kosygin, leaders and delegates of both nations met in Tashkent, Uzbek SSR, USSR. A peace treaty, Tashkent Declaration was signed by the two belligerent nations.

In that treaty, it was agreed in clause VII:

The Prime Minister of India and the President of Pakistan have agreed that they give instructions to their respective authorities to carry out the repatriation of the prisoners of war.

Also as hinted by Siddant Kumar, both Pakistan and India were parties to Geneva Convention (Fourth one since 1950s) which states in Article 133:

ART. 133. — Internment shall cease as soon as possible after the close of hostilities.

So that's why Indians released Pakistani prisoners because:

  1. They wanted their own prisoners back and Pakistan wasn't going to release Indians unless India released Pakistani prisoners too.
  2. The war was over. There was no point in holding the Prisoners for either side.
  3. Repatriation of POWs is a standard practice when negotiating a peace treaty after a war.
  4. Both India and Pakistan were obligated by their legal duties as defined in Geneva Convention of 1949 to repatriate the PoWs after the conflict had ended.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.