What did the ancient Egyptians think of Khufu? Did they feel he was cruel, strict, kind, greedy, ect?
I need this information for a school project I'm working on about Khufu.
Why the idea of Khufu being a tyrant is common
Herodotus said so, in his "Histories", Book II. The fulltext is here. The section concerning Khufu is the last quarter of the book or so, starting with the paragraph "Till the death of Rhampsinitus ...".
Now, when it comes to ancient Greek historians, writing about things they could not possibly have known, I would urge extreme caution. Both of them, Herodotus and Diodoros, lived more than 2000 years after Khufu died, literacy was less common at the time than in the last 2000 years and they would have known much less about Khufu's time than we know about events 2000 years ago (e.g. about Diodoros). Being ancient Greek historians, however, they adopt a paternalizing tone and attempt to lecture us about anything and everything.
What was Khufu really like; what did his subjects think of him?
Impossible to know. He was a well-established king; he - or more likely his vizier (tjati) - oversaw many great building projects including one that would remain the tallest man-made building for almost 4000 years. Presumably, his subjects thought that he was the king (actually, the Pharaoh, hence a living god) and that it was appropriate for them to follow his orders. There is no evidence that he was particularly cruel (for an absolute ruler), especially not in the ways that Herodotus etc. detail.
According to wikipedia, Khufu had a more extensive mortuary cult than his immediate predecessors and successors, suggesting some level of popularity. It even seems to have been revived later, in the New Kingdom.
What is wrong with Herodotus' account?
But why were Herodotus & Co. so wrong?
The wikipedia article suggests multiple reasons: propaganda and defamation on the part of the Greeks, a dislike for huge building projects (for which the pyramid certainly qualifies) in later times, or a misreading of the character denoting Khufu's name (originally read "Khufu", "the protected one", but later "Shufu", "bad luck", "sinful").
I think your question has many parts to it depending on what social class you are looking for. Typically, those in power feel one way over those that are enslaved. I have found evidence though that Khufu was thought of as a greedy, self serving, malicious, leader. Based off the article below who cites primary sources
Khufu is often described as a cruel leader. Contemporary documents suggest that unlike his father he was not seen as a beneficent ruler and by the Middle Kingdom he is generally described as heartless ruler. In the Westcar Papyrus he is depicted as being keen to increase his own power and ensure the continued rule of his family, but is not as a particularly cruel monarch although he does offer the life of a criminal to test the skills in resurrection of a magician (which is often quoted as evidence that he was evil). -Source Ancient Egypt Online
I also found this:
Although King Sneferu was remembered as a benevolent and beneficent ruler, Khufu is believed by some to have been a more ruthless and cruel despot. He was rumored in later times to have been prone to enjoying the fantastic stories of the reigns of his predecessors, as well as tales of magic and the mystical. His fame lasted throughout Egyptian history and he still had a funerary cult as late as the Saite Dynasty (26th Dynasty). Of course, whether or not he was a cruel ruler, he did command a tremendous ability to organize and mobilize worker. -Source: Guardians Of Egypt
The one thing you should always remember when studying history is look at who is writing the primary source. Conflicting reports can be found about almost all leaders what matters is can you group the opinions together based off of social status, ideological beliefs, location, etc, etc.