3

Some ancient cultures used a Lunar calendar and the "New Moon" is considered the first of the month.

In ancient Semitic cultures, Assyria, Persia, Akkadia, Israel, etc - how was the new moon identified when it is never visible?

  1. Is there historical evidence that the waxing crescent moon was always accepted "as and for" the new moon?
  2. How early were pre-calculations being made? Were they accurate?
  3. Was it ever the case that they had to retroactively assign the day before as the 1st of the month?

There seems to be, minimally, a 12 - 15 hour margin of error before even the Waxing Crescent Moon can be seen - which occurs after the new moon. (See Astronomy.SE/How Soon Could a Waxing Crescent Moon Be Seen?.)

Note: This is a request for historical evidence, citable references, explaining the dilemma - preferably in view of Babylon, Israel, and other Semitic cultures.

3
  • 1
    3. still happens today.
    – Medi1Saif
    Apr 7, 2017 at 19:24
  • @medi1Saif - do you have a reference for that. That would be very helpful. Thanks! Apr 7, 2017 at 20:25
  • 2
    Because Saudis relay on their um al qora calender and moonsighting reports of witnesses this happens about each couple of years because many Muslim countries relay on Saudi Arabia in this point. I have written some answers on that topic on ISE. And asked a somewhat similar question in the context of Islam there.
    – Medi1Saif
    Apr 7, 2017 at 20:34

1 Answer 1

10

In Jewish custom, all calendar questions were decided by the court (Synedrion). It was a duty of everyone who spotted the new Moon to report to this court as soon as possible. But of course, the new moon is not always visible, the sky can be covered by clouds for example, so the Synedrion decided when to start the new month, based on all available evidence, including the knowledge of the average length of the month which they calculated based on previous observations. I take this information from the book of

Shlomo Sternberg, Celestial mechanics, vol. I, Benjamin Inc., NY 1969, and he refers to Maimonides Code, Ch. XVIII, sections 5-9, "Laws of the sanctification of the new moon". Sternberg refers to a Hebrew edition, and I am not sure whether an English translation exists.

EDIT. Much more detail can be found in the article by N. I. Idelson, History of the calendar, (Russian, 1925, reprinted in his book Essays in the history of celestial mechanics, Moscow, Nauka, 1975, also in Russian). I cite (my translation):

It was a duty of Synedrion in Jerusalem to determine the beginning of the month. It formed a special committee for this purpose. This committee had to perform its own observation and hear the evidence of vitnesses, there had to be at least two such vitnesses, and their testimonies had to agree. Moreover, it was a duty of every Jew, even on Saturday, to go to Jerusalem to give a testimony. After the decision was made by Synedrion, it was recorded, and the chief judge sanctified the new month with a prayer. Then they began to inform the population: for this a system of fire signals was used, they were lit on the hilltops. Later they started to send messengers from Jerusalem to other cities. In the case of doubt, the principal feasts (which were all tied to the lunar calendar) were celebrated for two days.

Actually there is an English translation of Maimonides:

https://books.google.com/books/about/Sanctification_of_the_new_moon.html?id=jq8rAAAAIAAJ

See also this paper which discusses the technical details:

http://u.cs.biu.ac.il/~belenka/mimo.pdf

EDIT2. There is no evidence that Babylonians (or Jews, or anyone else before the Greeks) tried to answer the question "how the Moon REALLY moves?" They only addressed VISIBLE phenomena. And the conjunction of Sun with Moon is never visible, except at the time of a solar eclipse. Geometric models of celestial motion are Greek invention. Early attempts do construct such space models did not survive to our time, almost all we know about Greek astronomy comes from Ptolemy. Theoretical constructions of Babylonians also did not survive. All we have are numerical tables of visible phenomena from which we try to reconstruct the method of composing such tables. The average length of the Lunar month was known to the Babylonians with high precision, and this number (29 days 12 hours 44 1/3 minutes) was incorporated into Jewish calendar in 499 bc. But sometimes the lunar month is 29 days and sometimes 30, and the ancients were very far from being able to explain the pattern.

5
  • "Citable reference" from ancient Babylon can be only a cuneiform table. Many of them are published and translated in O. Neugebauer, Astronomical cuneiform texts, Springer, 1955.
    – Alex
    Apr 7, 2017 at 4:53
  • 3
    Neither Babylonians nor the ancient Jews could or even tried to determine the moment of true conjunction. The Jewish month started on the day when the new Moon was VISIBLE, not on the true conjunction. The very notion of conjunction is Greek. But Maimonides tries to determine the moment of conjunction based on Ptolemy's theory. See the last paper cited in my answer.
    – Alex
    Apr 7, 2017 at 5:20
  • Alex - A.) The theological text from Maimonides is unhelpful - as I am hoping for historical evidence, and reluctant to anachronistically impose Maimonides' theology on civilizations 1.5 - 2 thousand years prior; B.) However, what you said about the Greeks and "Lunar Conjunction" is very relevant : When did the Greeks start relying on the "Lunar Conjunction"? C.) As the Conjunction is often related to astrology, and considering Babylonian culture - is it implausible that Semitic cultures observed the practice as well as the Greeks? Apr 7, 2017 at 15:42
  • 1
    This discussion becomes too long and technical, and this is discouraged by this site rules. The best general source on Babylonian astronomy, besides the one I already mentioned is O. Neugebauer, A history of ancient mathematical astronomy, 3 vols, Springer 1975.
    – Alex
    Apr 7, 2017 at 16:15
  • Alex - Thank you. I will look for an answer in there. Apr 7, 2017 at 16:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.