I've been reading a bit about the fairly peaceful transition of power in Czechoslovokia through the protests throughout the country, but I'm wondering, why didn't the ruling party attempt to bring the military to the streets to shut down the protesters with force?

  • 5
    Likely for fear that the military wouldn't follow orders. This was not an unfounded belief May 16, 2017 at 3:21
  • I believe this was tried (unsuccessfully) during the Hungarian Revolution of 1956,.
    – bof
    May 16, 2017 at 7:17
  • 1
    The regime would colapse sooner or later with everyone on the democratic side.
    – Probably
    May 20, 2017 at 5:56

1 Answer 1


Communism has always been buttressed by force.

In Eastern Europe it was either actual Soviet troops (Germany-1953, Hungary-1956, Czechoslovakia-1968) or the imminent credible threat thereof (Poland-1980). Local troops has never been particularly reliable.

You need to look at the context. Communism was crumbling everywhere. By 1989, Gorbachev made it clear that USSR will not intervene, and it was perfectly clear that the communist power could not be kept. The choice was not "keep power by force" vs "relinquish power" but "relinquish power peacefully" or "be forced out".

  • 4
    It seems like the actual choice was between "go peacefully" or "be shot".
    – jamesqf
    May 16, 2017 at 17:18
  • 1
    @jamesqf: yes, this is how it did pan out at the end.
    – sds
    May 16, 2017 at 17:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.