3

This one thing was always troubling me. How and why could the Belorussian and Ukranian SSRs gain so much of theoretical autonomy so as to have their own autonomous Foreign Policies while other states couldn't?

1

It was a diplomatic fiction. The UN was set up to represent the international power balance at the end of WWII, not just the ideals of democracy, equality, and freedom.

The capitalist winners of WWII had three permanent seats in the security council, four is you count the RoC as capitalist, while the communist winners had just one. Similar numbers in the general assembly. So the Soviets got two extra delegations with extra votes in the general assembly, but no extra veto powers -- one veto is enough to stop any action.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Sorry, -1, the SC had nothing to do with that... – Felix Goldberg Jul 22 '17 at 16:30
  • @FelixGoldberg, I said that they got extra votes in the general assembly because there extra votes would matter, but not in the UNSC. – o.m. Jul 22 '17 at 16:32
  • It's an ok conjecture but I happen to know that it is not correct. – Felix Goldberg Jul 22 '17 at 16:34
  • @FelixGoldberg, I thought that came up at Yalta where Stalin wanted more seats, and got three. – o.m. Jul 22 '17 at 16:37
  • @FelixGoldberg can you provide evidence for your position - you might be right, but simply saying "I know I'm right" is not enough – user13123 Jul 23 '17 at 4:34

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.