Archelaus transferred the capitol of Macedon from Aegae to Pella in the early 4th century B.C. What could have been the reason for this?

1 Answer 1



According to A Companion to Ancient Macedonia edited by Joseph Roisman, Ian Worthington, the "site was attractive for several reasons".

  • The location controlled a crossroads,"controlling major passageways from east to west, and south to north."
  • The location was also situated on a lake, with a port which may have been able to be reached from the sea.
  • The location was also located on a 'fertile hinterland' for food production.

Concerning Archelaus, we have what Thucydides, History of the Peloponnesian War said to go on when discussing the invasion of Macedonia from Thrace to the north (emphasis mine):

...retired all within their strongholds and walled towns, as many as the country afforded, 4 which were not many then, but were built afterwards by Archelaus the son of Perdiccas when he came to the kingdom, who then also laid out the highways straight and took order both for matter of war, as horses and arms and for other provision, better than all the other eight kings that were before him.

So Archelaus is credited with more military growth then all Macedonian kings before him. Specifically for fortification of cities. As mentioned above, Pella lies along a main North-South route, along the Varder-Axios river valley. This would be a natural route from the interior lands into Macedonia. Fortifications built here control your northern frontier. This is discussed in In the Shadow of Olympus: The Emergence of Macedon By Eugene N. Borza

The availability of resources, such as grain and fresh water, though it may seem of economic value to us, is also of prime military importance. When Sitalces invaded through that northern frontier, as mentioned by Thucydides , the Macedonian population "retired all within their strongholds and walled towns". If you had the resources you could do that. The Wikipedia article, though not very in-depth, says his invasion ended when "He was obliged to retire through failure of provisions." (A bit of diplomacy and a marriage helped. Emphasis mine)

So the location offered control of the northern frontier, access to the sea, and resources to enable one to be able to withstand a siege. Looks like a good choice to me. Location, Location, Location.

  • 1
    The arguments are very nice, but the title is not so. All your arguments belong to economical reasons. And not, for example, because of better defendability. As for Location, any change of placement is due to location. It is trivial.
    – Gangnus
    Commented Aug 1, 2017 at 8:55
  • These are all true observations. I'm still looking for some historical context. IE, what did it have to do with the rise of Macedon?
    – John Dee
    Commented Aug 1, 2017 at 22:48
  • You have made me realize that I may need to modify my question, in order to look for some context.
    – John Dee
    Commented Aug 2, 2017 at 1:48
  • @John Dee If you are really interested in background context you might check out this video course on Ancient Greek History from Yale. The instructor literally 'wrote the book' on the subject of the Peloponnesian War.(He's the first reference in the wiki page). Also look at Thucydides of course, for a primary source.
    – justCal
    Commented Aug 2, 2017 at 15:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.