9

I was watching Wonder Woman and noticed that it had been shifted from her typical origin story of being found by a WW2 fighter pilot to being found by a WW1 spy. Chris Pine called WW1 the war to end all wars.

Through our lens, in which WW1 certainly did not end all wars (And probably sparked a few), it seems silly to name any war that doesn't end in human annihilation the war to end all wars. Someone's gonna get pissy about something, and bam, we have a war.

That said, Industrial war was a new concept back then, and the turn of the 20th century was fairly optimistic in general (See: Worlds fair). Did people actually believe that the outcome of WW1 would actually be the end of war?

1
  • 2
    Perhaps not so much believe as hope...
    – Jon Custer
    Aug 15, 2017 at 18:57

2 Answers 2

7

Your question is too broad to fully answer, but the ideas behind the phrase have indirectly led to the UN. The optimism about preventing conflicts through cooperation is alive and well.

Optimism about said cooperation ending all wars almost certainly died with the abject failure of the League of Nations - and never was extremely widespread to begin with.

H.G. Wells coined the phrase. His vision was that after the terrible destruction of industrial war, all people would come together in a League of Nations to make a lasting peace.

These ideas gained some popularity during WWI, and afterwards the League of Nations was formed. Woodrow Wilson (oft associated with the quote) was a driving factor behind this.

The failure of Wells' ideas (and origin of the ridicule of the phrase) is best demonstrated in how the League of Nations was completely powerless to prevent WWII.

More in depth reading: http://www.vision.org/visionmedia/history-world-war-I-world-wars/81869.aspx

1

Yes, the "war to end all wars" was mostly a notion created for political speeches, and there were numerous reasons for contemporaries to contest the reality of that.

However, what might be an important difference compared to today's point of view is that, back in 1918, the more people doubt of the "war to end all wars", the more they wanted to take measures to prevent new wars.

The most important example of such a state of mind is France: In France, the general outlines of the "war to end all wars" were:

  • WW1 (called Great War by that time) was horrible: measures should be enforced to prevent a new war, especially a German revenge
  • The victory was to be used to enforce such measures: this was the main goal of French negotiations of Versailles

You might note, ironically, that at least in the political and social state of mind in Germany and English-speaking countries, such French-imposed measures at Versailles triggered the revenge spirit.

1
  • you're right, thanks for the note Jul 7 at 18:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.