0

The PRC-ROC schism aside, has there historically been (or is there today) any animosity or feelings of cultural or racial superiority between Mandarin-speaking Chinese and Cantonese-speaking Chinese?

If not... don't mean to sound rude, but why not? (Few nations with multiple languages escape some degree of animosity or prejudice.)

If it used to be a factor but is not so much any more, when and how was it tamped down... under Communism?

11
  • Simple question, simple answer: No, there is none because Chinese as written today can be read in Mandarin AND Cantonese (the intonation is of course different). It isn't clear to me why you would think the language is newer than the political system (i.e. Communism) or that it should be divisive? If it's from a historical perspective, which period?
    – J Asia
    Sep 28, 2017 at 18:56
  • And the PRC-ROC schism is not about language, at all.
    – J Asia
    Sep 28, 2017 at 19:00
  • 4
    "Few nations with multiple languages escape some degree of animosity or prejudice" - is this based on any evidence? Trying to understand your whole question on animosity.
    – J Asia
    Sep 28, 2017 at 21:20
  • 2
    PRC-ROC is irrelevant; major languages used in Taiwan are: Mandarin, Taiwanese Hokkien, Hakka, and Aboriginal languages. Sep 29, 2017 at 0:12
  • 1
    Congusbongus, thanks for the info; I had assumed that Taiwan was Cantonese... I should have verified that. Sep 29, 2017 at 17:07

4 Answers 4

5

Yes, absolutely. Such an animosity or resentment is sure to develop when one regional dialect becomes elevated above others as a prestige or national language, as has happened with Mandarin, the speech of Beijing. Compare to southern India's distaste for Hindi.

Business Insider mentioned "fury" and "demonstrations" in response to Mandarin requirements. The Economist called their imposition "contentious". The BBC reported that some people were "refusing to speak" Mandarin.

2
  • Thanks for the links. Now I remember Mandarin... rules? edicts? official government statements?... for the newly repatriated Hong Kong being issued in Mandarin to make a point about Beijing's dominance. Sep 29, 2017 at 17:11
  • This answer is nonsense. Some animosity does arise when an authoritarian government (such as the CCP) tries to impose the majority language (such as Mandarin) on speakers of a minority language (such as Cantonese). But such animosity is no different from and no greater in degree than that which would arise anywhere else in the world.
    – user103496
    Oct 14 at 2:41
3

From the final comment in question, "northern Mandarin / southern Cantonese regional split" -- I believe you are looking at the North-South China divide. The Wikipedia on this is useful, but clearly short on how far this goes back in history.

There is an ancient Chinese proverb/belief:

In the South the boat, in the North the horse (Nām chuán, běi mã)"

which translates to how ancient Chinese society functioned (or should function) because of difference in geography, about 3,000 years ago, Zhou Dynasty.

The person credited with this belief is Duke Liu (公劉 / Gong Liu), an important ancestor of the Zhou Dynasty. His presence is still felt in modern Chinese society in several areas, such as urbanism, language, and poetry

In ancient China, with insufficient infrastructure and early stages of statehood, there was a difference between North and South, which was not a matter of what language one spoke, but geography:

  • North: Plains (open terrain)
  • South: Lakes, rivers, mountains (natural barriers)

The result of this was not just different language but something as basic as food - which still persist today (in terms of preference and staple diet):

This proverb has morphed over the years, to encompass more than just geography, and Chinese society has developed their own (i.e. Chinese) self-perception of this North-South divide. As Wikipedia article explains, it is more a cultural difference than merely just differences of language i.e. "between Mandarin and Cantonese" of your question.

To be sure, Mandarin spoken in northern China is somewhat different than in southern China. But don't confuse it with any animosity of "Cantonese vs Mandarin".

Perhaps, a source of this confusion or stereotyping could be attributed to the fact that southern China has multiple dialects, it is therefore assumed there is animosity (between the dialect-speaking south and the Mandarin-speaking north)? (see quote below)


Additional Context: Information on 'Chinese Language'

Today: is Mandarin a language or a dialect does generate quite a few heated debates even within Chinese society (again, see quote below). The same can be said of Cantonese. Again, it doesn't mean there is animosity when they have their debates, I think it is healthy to have debates.

Finally, I am not going to write a monograph on the social history of the Chinese language (not least because I am not qualified to do so), but to give an idea of how complex the discussion of Chinese language can be -- even amongst linguists and scholars -- I have a provided a quote from Modern Chinese: History and Sociolinguistics (Cambridge, 2014), pp. 2-3 (emphasis are mine):

The major dialect groups are Beifanghua (Mandarin), Wu, Yue (Cantonese), Min, Kejia (Hakka), Xiang, and Gan, of which Mandarin is by far the largest group, with its native speakers accounting for the majority of the Chinese population.

The non-Mandarin groups are also called the Southern dialects. Each of the major dialect groups is in turn comprised of a large number of varieties that are related to each other in terms of a hierarchy with three main levels, sub-dialect, vernacular, and accent. For example, following the traditional classification, Mandarin is composed of four major sub-dialects, namely, Northern, Northwestern, Southwestern, and Jiang-Huai, all of which may be further divided into different groups of vernaculars and accents. The standard form of Modern Chinese is known by several names. It is called putonghuà ‘the common language’ in mainland China, guóyi ‘national language’ in Taiwan, and huáyi ‘Chinese language’ in Singapore.

In case you missed the first and last sentence of this quote, there's at least 4 different ways to say Mandarin for Mandarin speakers: putonghuà ‘the common language’ in mainland China, guóyi ‘national language’ in Taiwan, and huáyi ‘Chinese language’ in Singapore and other parts of Southeast Asia, and beifanghua referring to North China. Let's just say the Chinese language has a complex history!


Therefore, no -- there is no animosity between Cantonese-speakers and Mandarin-speakers, but there are debates and to term it as "animosity" is a stretch and stereotyping the North-South divide. However, there is a cultural divide between Northern and Southern China, from ancient history to today.

2
  • Generally in East Asia, speaking the other person's language, is seen as a good thing. I just discovered this social experiment, 'Talking to Koreans as a Muslim' - featuring multiple nationalities (not just Koreans), and notice how often the subjects brought up the ability to speak local language fluently, Korean (a good thing).
    – J Asia
    Oct 6, 2017 at 5:03
  • Therefore, no -- there is no animosity between Cantonese-speakers and Mandarin-speakers How do any of the preceding citations and quotes lead to this conclusion?
    – user103496
    Oct 15 at 1:09
1

Ironically, people in Taiwan speak Mandarin. So "dialect" is not the cause of the PRC-ROC split. Instead, it goes back to the Chinese civil war of the early 1930s and late 1940s (interrupted by the Japanese invasion of 1937-45).

Historically, the split has been between the more traditional, orderly Mandarin-speaking north, and the looser, more entrepreneurial Cantonese-speaking south. That's where dialect may come into play (or at least serve as a proxy for more fundamental differences).

6
  • Yep, I hadn't actually looked up Taiwan's dominant language before writing that part of my question... ack! Thanks. Sep 29, 2017 at 17:12
  • @Amorphous Blob To be clear, Mandarin is the language of government as a result of the Chinese takeover after WWII. But the most common mother tongue in the country is Taiwanese aka Minnanese.
    – Readin
    Oct 16, 2018 at 4:16
  • And... I had heard of Taiwanese before too, but blanked on that, too. Do you know if it's considered relatively (or somewhat) close to Cantonese? Oct 16, 2018 at 12:47
  • @Amorphous Blob I don’t know a lot about the languages, but a quiz google search for a tree chart of Chinese languages indicates that Mandarin and Cantonese are more closely related to each other than they are to Taiwanese.
    – Readin
    Oct 16, 2018 at 14:50
  • @AmorphousBlob: What is often referred to as "Taiwanese" is simply Hokkien. Mandarin, Cantonese, and Hokkien are not mutually intelligible.
    – user103496
    Oct 14 at 2:33
0

has there historically been (or is there today) any animosity or feelings of cultural or racial superiority between Mandarin-speaking Chinese and Cantonese-speaking Chinese?

No, or at least not more than between English- and French-speaking Canadians, or between English- and Spanish-speaking Americans, or between German-, French-, and Italian-speaking Swiss.

Some animosity does arise when an authoritarian government (such as the CCP) tries to impose the majority language (such as Mandarin) on speakers of a minority language (such as Cantonese). But such animosity is no different from and no greater in degree than that which would arise anywhere else in the world.

In Cantonese-speaking Hong Kong, there is (or was) feelings of cultural superiority over mainlanders, but such feelings do not stem so much from language as from the plain and simple fact that Hong Kong is (or was) vastly richer and more advanced than the mainland. Mainlanders who come to Hong Kong are (or were) often Cantonese-speaking too (coming from neighboring Guangdong (Canton) province).

3
  • How is this not simply an (overlong) opinion-based comment? Oct 14 at 19:00
  • 1
    Not footnoted... so? It's interesting and helpfully informative. Oct 16 at 12:40
  • @AmorphousBlob: Thanks. Unfortunately too many are unable to exercise critical thinking and automatically believe that answers with links, footnotes, and "sources" are more credible than those without (even though those links, footnotes, and "sources" may be completely irrelevant).
    – user103496
    Oct 17 at 0:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.