25

In the book Hattin by John France the following claim is made:

The fighting qualities of western knights were widely recognized in the Mediterranean lands, and they were often employed even by Muslim powers. (p.19)

But Mr. France gives no examples. Are there any?

  • 2
    Two great answers; wish I could accept both... – Felix Goldberg Oct 15 '17 at 10:10
  • 1
    Lol, it doesn't matter. Lars has a good answer too and I added mine after his - so his is first in line. I did it to share a bit of history (that's all). – J Asia Oct 15 '17 at 13:42
21

There are a number of references to European mercenaries serving in various Muslim armies, but in most cases it is unclear whether any of them were knights and many of the examples are after the start of the Crusades.

However, one good example of Christian knights serving a Muslim ruler is this one

European mercenaries served in Muslim armies, notably in North Africa and in the Middle east. For some years before 1147, there was a company of Christian knights in Morocco who had their own clergy and even a bishop. Christian mercenaries became one of the best fighting forces in the Turkish army.

Source: Hunt Janin & Ursula Carlson, 'Mercenaries in Medieval and Renaissance Europe'

If one accepts El Cid (c.1043-1099) as a knight (he was certainly a noble and and C.M. Yonge claims that he was knighted by King Ferdinand I of Leon), then he would be another example:

The Spanish hero El Cid, having served as a mercenary captain for both Christian and Muslim leaders....

Source: Hunt Janin & Ursula Carlson

The Wikipedia page on El Cid gives more details on this:

El Cid found work fighting for the Muslim rulers of Zaragoza, whom he defended from their traditional enemies, Aragon and Barcelona.

El Cid may have been involved in the Battle of Graus (1063) at which 300 Castilian knights fought on the side of Ahmad al-Muqtadir, ruler of the Islamic taifa of Zaragoza, against the Christian Ramiro I of Aragon. However, it is unclear if they were there as mercenaries or as allies.

Also in Spain, M. Florian in History of the Moors of Spain recounts the following (author's orginal spellings retained):

...in a battle which occurred A.D. 1010 between two Mussulman leaders, there were found among the slain a count of Urgel and three bishops of Catalonia...

Christian soldiers (unclear if this reference includes knights) serving a Muslim ruler prior to the Crusades is also mentioned by Hussein Fancy in The Mercenary Mediterranean

The use of Iberian Christian soldiers in Islamic armies was not limited to the peninsula. The Almoravid ruler ‘Ali B. Yusuf Tashfin (r. 1061 – 1106) was said to have first introduced the practice to North Africa.

It may seem strange that Christian soldiers (knights or otherwise) at times fought for Muslim rulers, but we should be careful not to look at relationships between Christians and Muslims from the modern perspective. Although it is true that Christian soldiers were usually used when Muslim rulers were fighting each other rather than fighting Christians, the early spread of Islam into Christian lands was often welcomed as a relief from Byzantine rule for Muslim rulers tended to be tolerant. As Jane Smith notes:

Military expeditions were political in nature and not undertaken for the purpose of forcing conversion to Islam. Christians and Jews were given “dhimmi” status, paying a poll tax for their protection.

Further west, the ability of Muslims, Christians and Jews to live together in peace up to the 10th century is well-illustrated by Spain:

Certain periods in world history reflected harmonious interactions among the three Abrahamic faiths. Medieval Andalusia, for example, provided a venue for Muslims and Christians, along with Jews, to live in proximity and even mutual appreciation. It was a time of great opulence and achievement, and social intercourse at the upper levels was easy. It was also a period during which a number of Christians chose to convert to Islam. Medieval Andalusia has often been cited as an ideal place and time of interfaith harmony.

This did not continue, of course, but even so extremism was not prevalent at the time and in-fighting among both Christian and Muslim rulers was very common. In such cases, rulers looking for mercenaries were not necessarily going to be fussy about the religion of those they hired. Also, when the Normans became a power in southern Italy, it was at the expense of both Christian and Muslim rulers.

In fact, there was no guarantee even that a Christian ruler could trust a fellow Christian not to join forces with a Muslim army - note the career of Roussel of Bailleul whose treachery (first abandoning a Byzantine army to join a Muslim force in defeating his former ally and then later setting up an independent state) eventually led to his capture by the Seljuks and execution by the Byzantines (1077).

On a final note, the Romance of Gillion de Trazegnies, a medieval work of fiction, concerns a knight who commanded the sultan of Egypt’s army. Although fiction, the character is based on various knights of the period so there may well be some factual basis.

Other sources:

C. M. Yonge The Story of the Christians and Moors of Spain

S. Lane-Poole The Moors in Spain

Brian Todd Carey Warfare in the Medieval World

S. Runciman A History of the Crusades: vol 1

30

Yes, there were -- and vice versa. There were European (Christian knights) operating as mercenaries for Muslim rulers as well as Muslim knights/mercenaries in Christian courts.


Farfanes - Christian Knights as Mercenaries (for Muslim Rulers)

Mainly in the Maghreb but it was not ad-hoc. In other words, it was institutionalised - emphasis mine:

In the medieval period, Muslim rulers frequently hired Christian mercenary soldiers to defend their persons and bolster their armies. Nowhere was this practice more common than in North Africa, a region, then as now, linked to Europe through migration, diplomacy, and trade. From the twelfth century to the sixteenth, North African regimes of all types found it useful to recruit European fighters to their sides. Some of these mercenaries were former prisoners of war, while others were prominent political exiles. Most, though, were of humbler origin, fighting men who found a lively market for their services in the decentralized, fiercely competitive political environment of the late medieval Maghrib.

Though their terms of service were informal at first, by the thirteenth century Christian mercenaries were a well-defined presence in North Africa. Treaties negotiated between their homelands and the governments that hired them specified their wages, weapons, and supplies in minute detail.

source: The Papacy and Christian Mercenaries of Thirteenth-Century North Africa, Speculum (Volume 89, Number 3 | July 2014), p. 601.

It wasn't just captured soldiers as slaves but also voluntary service - same source, p. 607:

Christian mercenaries had first come to the Maghrib a hundred years before. Many of them were prisoners of war captured by the Almoravids during their Iberian campaigns. These conscripts were soon joined by genuine volunteers, the most famous of whom was Reverter, viscount of Barcelona and lord of La Guardia de Montserrat, who rose to a leadership position in the Almoravid army before dying in the Maghrib in 1144.


Muslim Knights under Christian Kings

Not what was asked specifically, but just for context (and perhaps a better understanding of Medieval history) - emphasis mine:

Sometime in April 1285, five Muslim horsemen crossed from the Islamic kingdom of Granada into the realms of the Christian Crown of Aragon to meet with the king of Aragon, who showered them with gifts, including sumptuous cloth and decorative saddles, for agreeing to enter the Crown’s service.

They were not the first or only Muslim soldiers to do so. Over the course of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, the Christian kings of Aragon recruited thousands of foreign Muslim soldiers to serve in their armies and as members of their royal courts. Based on extensive research in Arabic, Latin, and Romance sources, The Mercenary Mediterranean explores this little-known and misunderstood history. Far from marking the triumph of toleration, Hussein Fancy argues, the alliance of Christian kings and Muslim soldiers depended on and reproduced ideas of religious difference. Their shared history represents a unique opportunity to reconsider the relation of medieval religion to politics, and to demonstrate how modern assumptions about this relationship have impeded our understanding of both past and present.

source: The Mercenary Mediterranean (Chicago University Press, 2016)

I have read (not in history SE) that Muslim soldiers should not be considered 'knights' because they lacked a chivalric code.. It has mostly been assumed that Saladin's exemplary conduct was an anamoly. If there is hesitation to consider Muslim soldiers as Knights, have a look at Furusiyya and Mubarizun.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.