9

I am not sure if this question is within the guidelines (it may be), but I am curious as to this: In North America, for instance, it is often said it was heavily forested and that a squirrel could get from one side unto the other without touching the ground.

  • 3
    This question seems to imply that the Angles (and presumably the Saxons & Jutes that came with them) had a dramatic effect on the landscape upon their arrival. I'm not sure that this is the case. – KillingTime Nov 11 '17 at 8:39
  • Well, the ænglisc did seem to build their houses mostly from wood and thatch out of worship, so I would assume at least that there would be a decent amount of trees cut down. – Matthew T. Scarbrough Nov 11 '17 at 10:04
10

The Angles, along with the Saxons and the Jutes, probably started arriving in Britain around the middle of the 5th century, some 50 years after Rome abandoned its northern-most province. They would have mostly seen a landscape with many features of the late Roman period (described below) in a state of decay, alongside Celtic Iron Age dwellings.

By the time the Romans arrived in Britain, much of England was already deforested though there were significant regional differences (this link is a download), ranging from around 15% forested area in central England and East Anglia to around 40% in upland northern England (largely modern-day Cumbria). Farming was both arable and pastoral with most people living in Iron Age-style roundhouses, which were made of timber and thatch, dotted across the landscape of much of England.

Iron Age Roundhouse

Source: Chris Gunns [CC BY-SA 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

The landscape the Romans found was one of cultivated fields and pastures, scattered farmsteads and settlements, and surviving islands of managed woodland.

The Romans eventually criss-crossed this landscape with roads, beside which many villages and towns developed. These often had rectangular houses and shops fronting onto the road.

Remains of a Roman villa, Oxfordshire

The remains of a Roman villa at North Leigh, Oxfordshire. Early Anglo-Saxons would probably have seen more than this as, over the centuries, people removed stones to construct churches, walls and houses. (Image is Copyright Richard Croft and licensed for reuse under this Creative Commons Licence.)

Probably no more than 10% of a population estimated to be between 2 to 3.5 million would have been ‘agriculturally non-productive’ during the late Roman period. This would have declined as

Towns and villas were falling into ruin within a generation [of the Roman departure]. It can be argued that the Anglo-Saxons, who arrived in numbers some decades later, came into a political and cultural vacuum – although many of the people were apparently still there, farming the landscape, albeit probably in smaller numbers.

Source: The British Museum, 'Roman Britain'

It is also believed that the population declined during the centuries following the Roman departure, perhaps by as much as half. Further,

With the disappearance of the Roman system the population of Britain would have reverted totally to a subsistence agriculture mode. We may thus expect for the area that is now England to find a settlement pattern made up of farmsteads for nucleated or extended families practising agricultural strategies designed to yield little in the way of surplus above that necessary to perpetuate the crops and herds.

Source: A.S.Esmonde Cleary, 'The Ending of Roman Britain'

However,

Squatter occupation..... seems to have continued in a number of towns and it is a measure of the skill of Roman planners and engineers that only two major Roman urban sites are unoccupied today, Silchester and Wroxeter...

Source: Michael Reed, 'The Landscape of Britain'

Roman Britain AD 410

Source: Lotroo / R. Botek; Изработено от Потребител:Lotroo (Own work) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

The Roman road network,on the other hand, would have been evident:

One important survival was the road network, which formed the skeleton of communications in Britain until the 18th century.

Source: The British Museum, 'Roman Britain'

When the Angles, Saxons and Jutes started to settle, the generally accepted view is

the taking-over by the Anglo-Saxons of a Romano-British site or social feature and its adaptation the better to respond to Anglo-Saxon priorities.

Source: A.S.Esmonde Cleary

  • 2
    I think that answer is near abouts perfect, lovely! Thank you so much. Interesting, hardly any forested lands -- I couldn't imagine it being heavily forested. I have been more interesting in the anglo saxons lately, and I was wondering as to what many believe they may have seen and such that goes with that. – Matthew T. Scarbrough Nov 11 '17 at 10:11
  • 1
    For comparative purposes, 10% of England is woodland (March 2017) according to forestry.gov.uk/forestry/infd-7aqknx so there has been quite a lot lost since the 5th century (though not as much as most people imagine). – Lars Bosteen Nov 11 '17 at 10:18
  • Growing up in history classes, which seem to paint things in a very biased light and/or had probably more wrong or misunderstood information that right, always seemed to depict struggles for resources, like trees, in their colonies, almost as if every mother country had become like Easter Island. – Matthew T. Scarbrough Nov 11 '17 at 10:23
  • 1
    I was later than the 80's, but for sure it's just biased perspectives. I am not saying that false material outweighs the true. – Matthew T. Scarbrough Nov 11 '17 at 19:30
  • 1
    I would really like to know why someone downvoted this. If there is something wrong, please tell me. – Lars Bosteen Nov 12 '17 at 2:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.