1

In the Oath of the Horatii, the Horatii brothers are depicted taking an oath before their father, with their sisters mourning at the side:

Painting Oath of the Horatii, by Jacques-Louis David

I would like to know whether there is any mention or evidence of the depicted oath in Roman sources. Do our sources tell that this oath took place in the way it is displayed in this painting?

I am inclined to think that this is not the case. Several reasons come to mind:

  1. Livy doesn't mention that the combatants took an oath of any kind.
  2. Livy states that the Roman army went out to meet the Alban forces, so it might be assumed that women stayed at Rome. Thus, by the time the combat between the Horatii and the Curiatii was arranged, it wouldn't have been possible for the brothers' sisters to be there and witness (and mourn) the oath.
  3. In fact, Livy explains that Camilla, who had been engaged to one of the Curiatii brothers, first saw her surviving brother when he returned to Rome, thereby implying that she (and, quite possibly, all women) had stayed at the city.

It could be possible to spot mistakes here and there. Attire and architecture could be, as it often happens, good nitpick or discussion sources. For instance, the helmet crest might not have been used at the time of the combat; if I recall correctly, it is first mentioned in the period of the first wars against the Gauls, during the times of the Republic. However, such details would not contradict the represented act of the oath, in the case that it were true, so they are not relevant to my question.

I am aware that it is possible that the author of the painting based his work not on the Roman sources, but on depictions and other derivative works, like the play Les Horaces. However, I am only interested in actual sources and the painting's concordance with them.

  • 3
    According to Wikipedia, *"... the moment depicted in David's painting is his own invention." Hardly surprising, as David was working in the 18C! – TheHonRose Feb 18 '18 at 0:58
  • 1
    @TheHonRose Well spotted! Sometimes I delve too much into details and miss such things. – Kalrish Feb 18 '18 at 15:06
2

According to your Wikipedia page:

It depicts a scene from a Roman legend about a dispute between two warring cities, Rome and Alba Longa, and stresses the importance of patriotism and masculine self-sacrifice for one's country.

The Horatii?

In the ancient Roman legend of the kingdom era, the Horatii were triplet warriors who lived during the reign of Tullus Hostilius. The accounts of their epic clash with the Curiatii and the murder of their sister by Publius, the sole survivor of the battle, appear in the writings of Livy.

Who is Tullus Hostilius supposed to be?

Myth and history

As with those of all the early kings of Rome, the events ascribed to the reign of Tullus Hostilius are treated with skepticism by modern historians. Part of this is due to obvious flaws in the literary tradition describing the kings: much like the confusion the Ancients exhibited in attributing identical accomplishments to both Tarquinius Priscus and Tarquinius Superbus, the accomplishments of Tullus Hostilius are thought by many scholars to be rhetorical doublets of those of Romulus.

Let me emphasise that again in force, since Wikipedia is a bit too diplomatic there: even the early republic left no reliable written sources for us. The kingdom era is even more so much less reliable than that. Shrouded in myth, legend and fantasy. There may be traces of actual history in it. But that cannot be ascertained. You cannot take one single thing or fact from the monarchical period and treat it at face value.

Adding to that that the picture in question is more than 2000 years younger than the "event" displayed and is typically for that style inventing its inventory in terms of clothing and weapons, it only presents an idea and allegory. Nothing in it can claim any historical accuracy.

But taking aside the fundamental aspect of "there were no real Horatii": this picture displays a scene that is not to be found in the sources we have, legendary as their factual content is. The absence of the scene from Livy means that the whole setup is made up by the painter as a form of interpolation.

  • 2
    Great answer! Just wondering, do you think David was also referencing The Tennis Court Oath which of course he also painted? – TheHonRose Feb 18 '18 at 3:08
  • 2
    @TheHonRose It's the other way around. The Horatii is older (1784) and got him into the revolutio business because it was so symbolic. The Ballhausschwur/ Serment du Jeu de Paume was a later (1790 and 1794) actualisation of the same theme. But they are very much connected. – LangLangC Feb 18 '18 at 3:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.