In Max Arthur’s Lost Voices of the Edwardians, a "compilation of memories from the turn of the century" (1901 - 1910), one Florence Hannah Warn relates how her brother Gilbert was buried:

When a tiny child died, the cost of a funeral was beyond the pocket of a poor family, so an arrangement was made to bury the infant at the same time as an adult’s funeral. In front of the glass hearse there was a little glass compartment running the width of the hearse, and the little coffin was placed there, and so buried in the adult’s grave....None of us attended the funeral, but I remember we had black sashes to wear on our Sunday dresses.

After a lot of searching, I came up with nothing further on this burial practice. I believe it is a form of tandem burial but this search term revealed no further details on the above (but it did turn up a lot on an 'historical' Irish hospital practice which came to light a few years back, concerning the burial of un-baptized babies in the coffins of unrelated adults). I may, of course, have been using the wrong search term.

Searching Victorian / Edwardian funeral practices also turned up nothing, though I did learn a lot about burial clubs. I also tried searching Florence Hannah Warn but again drew a blank.

It seems strange that I've turned up no other information so I'm wondering just how widespread burying a child in the grave of an unrelated adult was.

Was this just an Edwardian practice, or does it date back further than that? Is there any archaeological evidence, for example, of this happening in earlier times? When did it die out, or was it made illegal?

EDIT The example here seems to be different from a 'common burial' as suggested by Boaz's comment. I may be reading too much into the passage cited, but it seems this was an individual adult's funeral - a hearse has been paid for (and a glass one at that - not cheap?). This raises the additional question as to whether the child's name appeared on a gravestone - maybe not, as the family did not attend the funeral.

  • The term I’m familiar with in this context is common burial
    – Boaz
    Jul 25, 2018 at 6:41
  • @Boaz Possible but a common burial means 'multiple' or 'several'. The passage above suggests only two coffins in one grave. Jul 25, 2018 at 13:48
  • 1
    The TV documentary Britain's Biggest Dig talks about excavating & relocating a couple of cemeteries. They show numerous graves being excavated and the discovery of adult and infant bones. They do discuss that burying infants with unrelated adults was a common practice, though, IIRC, many of the graves were 19th century, not 20th so it would be more Victorian than Edwardian.
    – FreeMan
    Jan 19, 2023 at 19:39
  • 1
    @FreeMan Sounds like a useful lead. Thanks for that. Jan 19, 2023 at 21:02

2 Answers 2


I can't say anything about Edwardian England, but my mother told me about her younger brother who died a few days after birth. This was somewhere around 1920s in The Netherlands.

My family owned a plot in a cemetery, a limited number of adult members of the family could find their resting place there. The infant was buried (his little coffin sideways) at the head of a space, so that both could be buried later on.

This was common practice in those days. My family was Catholic, but I've heard similar stories from protestants.

  • Interesting, and closer than anything else I've seen to what was described in Lost Voices. Dec 29, 2018 at 8:20

My grandmother purchased a grave in Burslem Stoke on Trent in the early 1920s. A baby about a year old was buried there in a 'shelf' to the side of the grave. The grave was 16 feet deep. Later my grandmother was buried there and later still both my parents

  • 3
    Was the baby related to your family?
    – Steve Bird
    Jan 17, 2023 at 7:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.