In Shakespeare's play "Julius Caesar", ambition is an undesirable trait: "The noble Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious. If it were so, it was a grievous fault". Was ambition widely considered a flaw or a sin, or is just a poetic licence?

  • Usually it depends on the word used. Being "ambitious" and being "stubborn" are almost synonymous, one being positive, the other being negative. – Bregalad Sep 17 '18 at 20:01
  • 1
    Brutus was implying that Caesar was ambitious for himself whereas this speech by Mark Anthony was pointing out that he was not purely self-motivated. Its usually the first that is seen as a flaw, more so than the latter. But of course there are many nuances. – Mozibur Ullah Sep 17 '18 at 20:29
  • Notwithstanding Shakespeare's authorship, this says more about ancient Rome than it di does about renaissance England. Maybe the opprobrium directed towards powerful commoners like Thomas Cromwell is more relevant? – Ne Mo Sep 18 '18 at 21:02
  • Thank you for your comments, but I must say that I am not entirely convinced that Shakespeare uses the term "ambiton" with more than one nuance. From Marc Anthony's speech I get the impression that ambition has only a negative connotation. Marc Anthony always tries to proove that Caesar wasn't ambitious, not that his ambitious was directed towards a greater good. Maybe I should address this question in the English stack exchange. – ctapus Sep 19 '18 at 19:59
  • @NeMo I am not familiar with the subject you mention, can you please link to a resource? – ctapus Sep 19 '18 at 20:04

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.