10

The following is an account of an impromptu conversation aboard the Enola Gay while in flight toward Hiroshima. According to Rhodes, The making of the atomic bomb, p. 707, the pilot, Colonel Paul Tibbets, was "wondering if [the crew] knew what they were carrying." Tail gunner Robert Caron guessed "a chemist's nightmare," then "a physicist's nightmare." Tibbets dissembled, "Not exactly." Caron recounts that then,

[Tibbets] started to crawl forward up the tunnel [to the front section of the plane]... I sort of tugged at his foot... He came sliding back in a hurry, thinking maybe something was wrong. "What's the matter?" ... "Colonel, are we splitting atoms today?" This time he gave me a really funny look, and said, "That's about it."

At this point, Tibbets decided to get on the PA and to the crew that the weapon was a nuclear bomb.

I was surprised by this anecdote, both because most of the crew didn't know when they took off and because Caron was so easily able to guess.

The Rhodes book is told mainly from the point of the physicists, presumably because that's who the historical sources are. He doesn't say much about public knowledge. The 1942 creation of the first nuclear reactor at Chicago had been part of the Manhattan Project, and was kept secret, especially because they didn't want the Germans to realize that sufficiently pure graphite could be used as a moderator. Apparently Einstein had to have the possibility of a nuclear chain reaction explained to him as late as 1939, when he signed the Einstein-Szilard letter. Meitner's paper describing nuclear fission had been published earlier that year.

What was publicly known before Hiroshima about the possibility of nuclear weapons? Was the possibility of a nuclear chain reaction publicly known, while details such as moderators, cross-sections, and neutron multiplicities were secret? Or was publicly available scientific knowledge just a vague idea that there was energy in nuclear reactions, but nothing as specific as the idea of nuclear chain reaction? I know that people working on the Manhattan Project originally discussed ideas like dropping radioactive dust on Germany.

  • 2
    If not similar questions here, certainly on HSM or Physics. "Atomic" weapons were popularized in fiction from the early 1900's, and gained more traction in the 1930s. Madame Curie, radium cures, and Rutherford accounted for the earliest interest. The early 1930s are the start of nuclear physics. The idea that you could get energy from radioactivity was well circulated. Not knowing exactly how to make a weapon did not deter writers from using the idea... – Jon Custer Feb 1 at 20:07
  • 2
    @JonCuster: Right, e.g., the 1941 Heinlein story "Solution unsatisfactory," en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solution_Unsatisfactory , with radioactive dust. – Ben Crowell Feb 1 at 20:22
  • 1
    You might find Wells' en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_Set_Free of particular interest, especially for the suggestion that it might have influenced Szilard's thinking. – richardb Feb 1 at 21:40
  • 1
    Also en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wings_Over_Europe_(play) - "Young British genius Francis Lightfoot has discovered how to make terrible bombs using the atom" - 1928 in New York, 1932 in London. – Jon Custer Feb 1 at 22:13
  • 2
11

Note that George Robert (Bob) Caron, the tail gunner, had graduated in 1938 from Brooklyn Technical High School: an elite New York City public high school that specializes in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. At such a school both teachers and students would have been well informed about the topics of current physics research, even as technical students today will know of string theory, the cosmic background radiation at ~4K, and the Higgs Boson. This likely made Caron better informed in physics than the general public at the time.

The key discoveries in atomic fission leading to the writing of the Einstein–Szilárd letter to Roosevelt that eventually triggered the Manhattan project all occurred well before Dec. 1941:

  • Albert Einstein in 1905 (his annus mirabilis or miracle year) had published his theory on the equivalence of mass and energy, now popularized with the equation E = mc^2. Although his Nobel Prize in 1921 was specifically for the photoelectric effect published that same year, it certainly would have contributed to wider knowledge of his other work.

  • In 1932 James Chadwick discovered the neutron.

  • in 1934 Irene Curie and Frederic Joliot found that some such transformations created artificial radionuclides.

  • At the end of 1938 Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann in Berlin showed that the new lighter elements were barium and others which were about half the mass of uranium, thereby demonstrating that atomic fission had occurred.

  • Lise Meitner and her nephew Otto Frisch, working under Niels Bohr, ... calculated the energy release from this fission as about 200 million electron volts. Frisch then confirmed this figure experimentally in January 1939.


In his memoirs of 1943 at Los Alamos (the chapter Los Alamos From Below in Surely You're Joking Mr. Feynman) Richard Feynman recalls a visit to Oak Ridge (my emphasis:

There was no information going back and forth. But Segre insisted they'd never get the assays right, and the whole thing would go up in smoke. So he finally went down to see what they were doing, and as he was walking through he saw them wheeling a tank carboy of water, green water - which is uranium nitrate solution.

He says, “Uh, you're going to handle it like that when it's purified too? Is that what you're going to do?"

They said, “Sure -- why not?"

"Won't it explode?" he says.

Huh! Explode?

And so the Army said, “You see! We shouldn't have let any information get to them! Now they are all upset.”

Well, it turned out that the Army had realized how much stuff we needed to make a bomb -- 20 kilograms or whatever it was - and they realized that this much material, purified, would never be in the plant, so there was no danger. But they did not know that the neutrons were enormously more effective when they are slowed down in water. And so in water it takes less than a tenth - no, a hundredth - as much material to make a reaction that makes radioactivity. It kills people around and so on. So, it was very dangerous, and they had not paid any attention to the safety at all.

....

I said, “In my opinion it is impossible for them to obey a bunch of rules unless they understand how it works. So it's my opinion that it's only going to work if I tell them, and Los Alamos cannot accept the responsibility for the safety of the Oak Ridge plant unless they are fully informed as to how it works!"

It was great. The lieutenant takes me to the colonel and repeats my remark. The colonel says, “Just five minutes, “and then he goes to the window and he stops and thinks. That's what they're very good at -- making decisions. ....

So in five minutes he said, “All right, Mr. Feynman, go ahead."

So I sat down and I told them all about neutrons, how they worked, da da, ta ta ta, there are too many neutrons together, you've got to keep the material apart, cadmium absorbs, and slow neutrons are more effective than fast neutrons, and yak yak - all of which was elementary stuff at Los Alamos, but they had never heard of any of it, so I turned out to be a tremendous genius to them.

....

The result was that they decided to set up little groups to make their own calculations to learn how to do it. They started to re-design plants, and the designers of the plants were there, the construction designers, and engineers, and chemical engineers for the new plant that was going to handle the separated material.

Thus much knowledge that the military would have liked to keep classified on the workings of the bomb had to be declassified in order to ensure safe operation of Oak Ridge in enriching the Uranium for the first bombs.


Note that the pulp era of Science Fiction had ended by about 1937 with the hiring of John W. Campbell as editor of Astounding Science Fiction (later Analog Science Fiction and Fact), starting the genre's Golden Age. As others have noted in the comments above, SF references to atomic power and bombs were fairly common by the early 1940's, including the Robert A. Heinlein's 1941 speculation on using atomic power to end WW2: 1941 Solution Unsatisfactory.

Comments being ephemeral and all that, here is an archive of the additional comment references above:

  • The World Set Free - H. G. Wells. 1914

    Wells's "atomic bombs" have no more force than ordinary high explosive and are rather primitive devices detonated by a "bomb-thrower" biting off "a little celluloid stud." They consist of "lumps of pure Carolinum" that induce "a blazing continual explosion" whose half-life is seventeen days, so that it is "never entirely exhausted," so that "to this day the battle-fields and bomb fields of that frantic time in human history are sprinkled with radiant matter, and so centres of inconvenient rays."

    Thank you richardb.

  • Wings Over Europe - Robert Nichols & Maurice Brown 1928

    Young British genius Francis Lightfoot has discovered how to make terrible bombs using the atom. He's soon dismayed by the greed and militarism of the British cabinet members.

    Thank you jon-custer.

  • Solution Unsatisfactory - Robert A. Heinlein 1941

    In November 1940, Astounding editor John W. Campbell had suggested that Heinlein write a story about the use of radioactive dust as a weapon, proposing a detailed scenario. [Although Heinlein completely reworked the original plot suggestion], Campbell quickly accepted the piece, changing the title to "Solution Unsatisfactory"; it appeared in the May 1941 issue, under Heinlein's "Anson MacDonald" pseudonym.

    Thank you Ben Crowell - it's literally been decades.

  • Deadline - Cleve Cartmill 1944

    [John W. ] Campbell liked the idea [a story about a futuristic super-bomb] and supplied Cartmill with considerable background information gleaned from unclassified scientific journals, on the use of Uranium-235 to make a nuclear fission device. The resulting story appeared in the issue of Astounding dated March 1944, which actually appeared early in February of that year.

    Thank you bof.


Finally, a dedication to three of my favourite writers of all time; Robert A. Heinlein, L. Sprague de Camp, and Isaac Asimov at the Philadelphia Navy Yard in 1944

enter image description here

  • 2
    Thanks, this is helpful. It's not clear to me that Feynman's Oak Ridge story necessarily implies that they had to declassify any information. They may have just widened the circle of people who were allowed to know certain things. The list of scientific discoveries that you give is good, but it doesn't really clarify whether there was public knowledge about chain reactions, neutron-induced fission, slow versus fast neutrons, moderators, ... – Ben Crowell Feb 2 at 19:03
  • @BenCrowell: That was the point of the Feynman story. Once you expand the circle of knowledge from a few dozen people in the New Mexico desert to several hundred people in eastern Tennessee, it is effectively declassified. – Pieter Geerkens Feb 2 at 19:09
  • @BenCrowell: I have added one more paragraph from Feynman to emphasize that he instructed everyone of note involved in the Oak Ridge plant design on the workings of atomic fission. – Pieter Geerkens Feb 2 at 19:28
  • E.O Lawrence in Science 94 (2436) 221-225 (September 5th 1941), "The New Frontiers in the Atom" - "Atomic physics developed rapidly; for the atom was found to be a domain of almost incredible richness, and to-day, thanks perhaps to the newspapers, our children speak knowingly of smashing atoms!" – Jon Custer Feb 5 at 19:34
3

A helpful example pointed out by @bof is the science fiction story "Deadline," Cleve Cartmill, Astounding Science Fiction, March 1944. The full text is here. Here are some quotes:

U-235 has been separated in quantity easily sufficient for preliminary atomic-power research, and the like. They got it out of uranium ores by new atomic isotope separation methods; they now have quantities measured in pounds. But they have not brought the whole amount together, or any major portion of it. Because they are not at all sure that, once started, it would stop before all of it had been consumed--in something like one micromicrosecond of time. [p. 154]

[...] Now the explosion of a pound of U-235, he said, 'Wouldn't be too unbearably violent, although it releases as much energy as a hundred million pounds of TNT.

The surrounding matter, unable to maintain a self-supporting atomic explosion normally, might be hyper-stimulated to atomic explosion under U-235's forces and, in the immediate neighborhood, release its energy, too.

[...] What we need is a damper, something to hold the temperature of surrounding matter down. [p. 174]

[...] Two cast-iron hemispheres, clamped over the orange segments of cadmium alloy. And the fuse --- I see it is in -- a tiny can of cadmium allow containing a speck of radium in a beryllium holder and a small explosive powerful enough to shatter the cadmium walls... the powdered uranium oxide runs together in the central cavity. The radium shoots neutrons into this mass--and the U-235 takes over from there.

According to the WP article, this story caused investigations by the FBI and the Counterintelligence Corps, so it seems that it represents a greater level of knowledge than intelligence agencies had believed to be publicly available.

It seems clear from the Cartmill story that the following were publicly known by 1944: the concept of a nuclear chain reaction; 235U and isotope separation; the possibility of using fission to initiate a fusion reaction; cadmium as an absorber; the use of an initiator.

The simple fact that a bomb was the most feasible military use of nuclear fission remained somewhat unsettled. Early in the Manhattan project, there was discussion of a bomb on an equal footing with the idea of using nuclear reactors in submarines. Much later, in 1943, Fermi suggested to Oppenheimer the use of radioactive strontium to poison Germans; Oppenheimer decided not to pursue the idea unless "we can poison food sufficient to kill half a million men."

There are some informative examples in which physicists outside the US-British alliance or outside Los Alamos didn't know certain things. In the following, page numbers are from the biography of Oppenheimer by Bird and Sherwin:

  • Bohr had opined while still in Denmark that if the US wanted to build a bomb, the industrial effort would be so great that they would have to turn the whole country into one big factory.

  • In 1941, Heisenberg showed Bohr a sketch of a concept for a bomb. Bohr was later snuck out of Denmark and showed the drawing to Bethe. Bethe was surprised, because it didn't look like the US bomb concept at all, and said, "My God, the Germans are trying to throw a reactor at London." Oppenheimer told Groves that this concept would be "a quite useless military weapon." (272)

There is various information that was not known by the Manhattan Project people until very late in the game:

  • There were three competing technologies for separating 235U. All three were pursued, and the liquid thermal diffusion concept was not actually attempted until Oppenheimer reread some old reports in 1944 and decided that it might be feasible. (278)

  • Before Trinity, estimates of yields were made with only order-of-magnitude confidence. (303)

  • It was only in July 1944 that tests (IIRC by Segre in an isolated cabin) showed that the gun design would not work for plutonium. (278)

There is also evidence that some of the physicists believed there were important secrets, because Fuchs and Hall spied for the Russians (285). They passed on both technical information and general information about the size and existence of the Manhattan Project. It's unclear or controversial how important their information was to the Soviets. Oppenheimer believed that the main secret was not technical but simply the size of the project (227).

I'm pretty sure the following were also not publicly known: accurate data on critical masses; high-explosive lens method; the fact that solid fissionables would compress significantly at the relevant temperatures.

2

The IDEA of the nuclear bomb was widely discussed since the discovery of radioactivity. In popular articles and science fiction. And research in this direction was not really secret until 1939-1940. In 1940, when it was realized by scientists that the idea is really feasible, restrictions on technical publications were introduced in Germany, Britain and USA. Only few years later, when the Soviets found that people are really trying to make the bomb abroad, they also made this research top secret.

Here is a passage from the book of Richard Rhodes, "Dark Sun":

Walking from the Moscow subway station to Laboratory No. 2 for the first time, one morning in 1944, the Soviet physicist Anatoli Alexandrov lost his way and stopped to ask a gang of neighborhood children for directions. "It's over the fence where they're making the atomic bomb," one of the children told him.

"Laboratory N2" was a top secret laboratory where the research on the bomb was done.

  • I suggest you add a link such as this as corroboration: "Stalin had initiated a modest nuclear programme in 1943, making Igor Kurchatov scientific director of a new Moscow institute, Laboratory 2. Stunned by the US test, [Hiroshima?] he stepped up the effort dramatically. In August 1945 he put his secret police chief, Lavrenti Beria, in overall charge of the bomb project ...." – Pieter Geerkens Feb 2 at 15:47
  • @PieterGeerkens: Stalin had news of the Trinity test via spies before he was told of it at the Potsdam Conference. – John Dallman Feb 2 at 18:16
  • @JohnDallman: You seem to have forgotten the point of your answer to this question - that the Trinity test had nothing to do with the Hiroshima bomb because it was testing the plutonium - ie Nagasaki - bomb of an entirely different design and fuel. Trinity was also in June 1945, well after 1943, and of interest to Stalin for entirely different reason than Hiroshima was. – Pieter Geerkens Feb 2 at 18:44
  • @PieterGeerkens: I was answering your "[Hiroshima?]" mark in the quoted text. It's possible he was reacting to the test, rather than the combat use. The design and fuel are also much less politically significant than proof that atomic bombs worked. – John Dallman Feb 2 at 21:39
  • @JohnDallman: No scientifically literate person doubted that an enriched uranium bomb was possible. The relevant questions were (1) Was there a more efficient process for enriching uranium? (Yes, but only perfected in Sept. 1945) (2) Was an implosion-type bomb, with the much more readily available plutonium, workable with 1945 technology?(Yes, demonstrated by the Trinity test.) – Pieter Geerkens Feb 2 at 21:54
-2

To add something more, I read a history of Japan in World War Two once which claimed that the Japanese public had an awareness of the concept of atomic bombs. I believe that it said that science fiction magazines from the USA eventually arrived in Japan via neutral countries and thus the idea of nuclear weapons gradually reached the Japanese public.

Some of the information contained in this post requires additional references. Please edit to add citations to reliable sources that support the assertions made here. Unsourced material may be disputed or deleted.

  • 1
    This is interesting, and I didn't downvote, but this might be better as a comment. – Ben Crowell Feb 3 at 20:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.