Slate (2010):

the minor emperor Napoleon III reserved a prized set of aluminum cutlery for special guests at banquets. (Less favored guests used gold knives and forks.)

I see the above claim (or some version thereof) repeated often (usually to illustrate that aluminum was once very rare). I am trying to find an original source for it.

  • 4
    I had no idea that Napoleon III was a minor emperor… Feb 14, 2019 at 7:30
  • 2
    It is true that at the time of Napoleon III, around 1870, aluminium was expensive. But when aluminium was expensive, it was approximately as expensive as silver. Aluminum then cost about 1 dollar/oz and the value of silver dropped a lot in those 1870's until about that. The statue of Eros in Piccadilly Circus and the top of the Washington Monument are made of aluminum and are from that time. I don't have certain facts about Napoleon's cutlery, although I have read that anecdote as well. But in no case at that time would an aluminum cutlery be considered superior in status to a gold one.
    – Ginasius
    Feb 14, 2019 at 8:09
  • 4
    @Ginasius There is always the possibility of a novelty/scarcity factor ("Look! This is aluminium").
    – SJuan76
    Feb 14, 2019 at 10:46
  • 5
    @Ginasius The reign of Napoleon III was from 1852-1870, so 1870 was the very end of his reign. Aluminium was probably much more expensive in 1852 than in 1870.
    – MAGolding
    Feb 14, 2019 at 18:20

1 Answer 1


This story seems to have been popularized by S. Venetsky in an unsourced article which first appeared in July 1969 in the Russian journal Metallurgist. The article was reprinted in Tales about Metals (1981). Unfortunately, in neither case does the author cite a source. According to Venetsky, Napoleon III

loved to show off and one day he gave a banquet at which the members of the royal family and the more illustrious guests were given the honour of eating with aluminium spoons and forks. The less honourable ones had to do with the common (at the emperor's table) gold and silver sets....even the emperor could not provide every guest with the precious aluminium.

Venetsky says this happened before 1855, which makes his story plausible at least. Before 1855, aluminium could only be produced in very small quantities and was more expensive than gold. This quickly changed after 1855 when a new process made it much easier to produce; by 1859, aluminium was only worth slightly more than silver.

Aluminium cutlery certainly existed; it is mentioned by Henri Sainte-Claire Deville in his 1859 book De l'aluminium: Ses propiétés, sa fabrication et ses applications. Deville was a French chemist who was given financial assistance by Napoleon III who had a keen interest in aluminium for his army:

It is said that the Emperor's interest in aluminium, in 1854, was aroused partly by the idea that if it could be had cheaply it would wonderfully lighten the weight of military equipments, such as spurs, buttons, sword-handles, sabre-sheaths, helmets, and the imperial eagles.

The above source, Aluminium; its history, occurrence, properties, metallurgy and applications, including its alloys (1890) also mentions jewelry and the first aluminium toy (a rattle) made for the emperor's son (but not the cutlery story mentioned by Venetsky). Deville also mentions jewelry but makes no mention of Napoleon III possessing aluminium cutlery.

Other sources would seem to indicate that the timeline doesn't quite fit, that items were not made from aluminium until after 1855 (when aluminium became less valuable than gold, though SJuan's comment on novelty value deserves a mention), and that the first items made were medals. Also, I've yet to find an academic biography of Napoleon III which mentions Venetsky's story.

enter image description here

One of the earliest surviving aluminium objects is this 1857 coin. There are no known surviving pieces of Napoleon III's cutlery, though. Image source: Essai en aluminium de 20 francs or Napoléon III, tête nue 1857 F.531/12 va

There are a number of other, similar, stories doing the rounds online, mostly less plausible than Venetsky's version (see here for example). This French article mentions dishes rather than cutlery, but admits to not being able to find firm evidence.

There is also a highly implausible story concerning the King of Siam - implausible because the first King of Siam to visit France was King Chulalongkorn (Rama V) in 1897. This visit may have been confused with King Mongkut (Rama IV) sending an emissary in 1861, but by this time aluminium was of no greater value than silver. Still, aluminium cutlery could have been used for its novelty value.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy