There were three main German bombers in use during the Battle of Britain: the Dornier Do 17, the Heinkel He 111, Ju 87 Stuka and the Junkers Ju 88. The Dornier 17 was an old bomber, no longer in production, Heinkel 111 was a slow (although heavily armoured) machine while the Junkers 88 was a new, fast plane:
Of the four types of bomber used by the Luftwaffe the Ju 88 (the original Schnellbomber) was considered to be the most difficult to shoot down. As a bomber it was relatively manoeuvrable and, especially at low altitudes with no bomb load, it was fast enough to ensure that a Spitfire engaged in a tail-chase would be hard pressed to catch up. source
Yet it was also the plane that suffered the heaviest (after Stuka - which was completely unsuited for the bomber role in the BoB) losses:
In reality, the Ju 88, although operating in smaller numbers than the Do 17 and He 111, suffered the highest losses of the three German bomber types. Losses of Do 17 and He 111s amounted to 132 and 252 machines destroyed respectively, while 313 Ju 88s were lost. ibid
Further search in wiki informs us that
Of all the losses suffered by the Ju 88 at that time, however, a number were due to the tricky behavior of the plane, especially when compared to the proven He 111, and to the crews' lack of experience on the type – many having converted to the Ju 88 only shortly before. Of the 39 losses recorded for July 1940, for example, only 20 were due to enemy action. The others being written off in training accidents, crashes, or malfunctions over mainland Europe source
That gives almost 50% loss due to accidents, which would make Ju88 probably one of the most unsafe combat planes from WW II. Was this trend continued during the rest of the war? If not, what changes have been made to improve crew safety? How is it in comparison to other new planes from the same time period?
I know that Ju88 was very versatile and dangerous to the enemy, but did it continue to be unsafe for the crew?