I've read many articles about them using clay tokens to ensure some authenticity of transactions, called Bulla, but I can't find any information about how they actually work.

Can anyone clarify?

It seems to suggest that if Steve buys 5 chickens from Bob, then he can write "Steve Owes Me 5 Chickens" on a piece of stone, and then bake it into a clay ball. Then this can be traded. But who keeps the clay ball? If you have an obligation, you can just throw it away and pretend it never happened. If it's Bob that keeps the token to prove Steve owes him, how does the ball itself prove anything? He could just lie and make his own clay ball with fake instructions inside.

There must be something I am not understanding about the security feature. Some articles suggest that tokens are inside the ball, rather than a contract, which is even more puzzling.

Edit: Also found this http://viking.som.yale.edu/will/finciv/chapter1.htm

Denise Schmandt-Besserat may have discovered the origins of writing on the surfaces of the clay bullae, but the mystery remains -- why did the ancient accountants of Uruk use a cumbersome bullae system for their records? Indeed bullae remained in use even after the full development of written script. The answer lies in the fact that they were more than accounting tools -- they were actual contracts.

Everything we think of as a financial instrument today is, in fact, a contract. A government bond, for instance, is a contract between the government and the bond-holder to guarantee a series of payments in the future. A share of stock is a contract between the shareholder and the corporation that guarantees participation in the profits of the firm, and a right to vote on management. Although contracts existed before the invention of writing, and even before the invention of bullae, the hollow clay balls and their tokens appear to be the earliest archaeological evidence of contracts. Each bulla found in the Inanna temple complex meant that someone -- and we don't know who, made a promise to give some commodities: jars of honey, sheep, cattle -- perhaps even days of work, to the temple. The writing on the outside of the bulla allowed the contracting parties to refer to the amount owed over the term of the contract, but the tokens inside, kept by the lender as evidence of the agreement, tangibly symbolized the obligation. This interpretation may explain other curious features of the bullae as well. Some of the envelopes are covered entirely in the impressions of cylinder seals -- the Mesopotamian equivalents of signatures. These undoubtedly represent a personal mark indicating the promise of the owing party. Bullae that are entirely covered in seal impressions seem to suggest that the owing party was concerned that the bulla holder might break open a small part of the bulla and insert some additional tokens.

We cannot really call the bullae the first financial instruments, because we do not know who the contracting parties were. We do not know whether the obligation is a return of a loan, or simply a tax or tribute to the temple. The bullae do not specify time (or at least Denise Schmandt-Besserat has not decoded the symbols for time) and they do not specify interest rates. All we know for sure is that they formalized commitments of future payments. The bullae were contracts that bridged a period of time -- from the moment when one party entered into an obligation, to the moment when the obligation was discharged.

But it's still unclear to me exactly what the tokens are for inside the bulla, if the bulla represents some kind of contract.

  • There is an old book (1992), I cannot really remember how the system works. But here's the book: Before Writing, Vol. I: From Counting to Cuneiform by Denise Schmandt-Besserat at Univ of Texas Press.
    – J Asia
    Sep 23 '19 at 22:54

From Wikipedia:

In their oldest attested form, as used in the ancient Near and Middle East of the 8th century BCE onwards, bullae were hollow ball-like clay envelopes that contained other smaller tokens that identified the quantity and types of goods being recorded. In this form, bullae represent one of the earliest forms of specialization in the ancient world, and likely required skill to create.

Based on this alone, it seems to me that the makers of bullae served a function basically comparable to that of a notary public today. They were a third party attesting to the validity of the token inside. If I don't know you but I do recognize the bulla you have as one made by an authority I trust, and if I can also see that the bulla is unbroken (so that the token inside has not been replaced or tampered with) this greatly increases my trust in the validity of the token inside.

Just as with a notary seal and signature today, forgery would have been a possibility. I'm not sure how common this was historically, but if the system was widely used, it must have had at least some reliability. If the bullae were too easily faked or tampered with, you are right to think they would not be very useful. Or if the makers of the bullae were corrupt and willing to verify false tokens, this would also have been just as problematic and potentially discovered in time.

  • May also be worth adding a reference to any known laws regarding fraud from the time period if someone knows of a good reference. Also, forgery and con artist scams probably seem a lot less profitable in an era where catching a bad case of being dead was relatively easy and common... Sep 23 '19 at 19:53
  • Ah, so they're just saying the tokens themselves aren't counterfeit? Because presumably you could just stamp the tokens rather than the envelope. I guess perhaps the tokens are easy to forge whereas the bulla is not. Although it seems cumbersome to have to create a bulla for transactions, especially as the quote says it requires skill to create one. @TheLuckless I read in some articles that forgery was rife back then, particularly shavings of silver/gold/other metals being mixed up. They used grains for currency to avoid this because you needed loads of them so it was hard to shortchange.
    – NibblyPig
    Sep 23 '19 at 21:54
  • I've also updated my question cos I found another article that suggests they're more to do with contracts but I still don't get the point of the tokens if it's true, why not just write IOU 5 sheep and both stamp the piece of clay?
    – NibblyPig
    Sep 23 '19 at 22:01
  • 1
    @TheLuckless Hossein Badamchi (2016) Fraud and Forgery in Old Babylonian Law may be relevant (but is unfortunately behind a paywall).
    – 0range
    Sep 23 '19 at 23:11
  • 1
    @NibblyPig To put it simple, these clay bullae predate writing. After writing was invented, contents were also written on the outside of the bulla. But the writing is easier to fake, like adding another scratch and changing a number to a larger one. So is there was a dispute, the bulla could be broken to check tokens inside.
    – Neith
    Sep 24 '19 at 16:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.