32

In defending his decision to withdraw from northern Syria and cease supporting Kurdish fighters in the face of the 2019 Turkish invasion, Donald Trump said:

[The Kurds] didn’t help us in the second world war, they didn’t help us with Normandy as an example ...

What exactly is Trump talking about? In what way were Kurds involved, or not involved, in the invasion of Normandy? Was there a sizable Kurdish population in France, or a Kurdish contingent of the Allied Powers which refused to support the operation, or something else?

  • 17
    I don't understand. Trump states that the Kurds didn't help, and you're asking how they helped? Trump's quote is a rhetorical device, not a historical assertion. This question appears more political than historical. – Mark C. Wallace Oct 10 at 11:59
  • 27
    @MarkC.Wallace Were any asked to or expected to help, but refused? That's really the question. If I tell you "the Kurds didn't help me make dinner last night" you might naturally wonder why I said that; perhaps I live with some, or perhaps I'm talking nonsense. I realize the political dimension is OT here but any factual historical information that might shed light on the statement would be welcome. If none, that is also an acceptable answer. – TypeIA Oct 10 at 12:06
  • 7
    As the cited Guardian article observes, Trump appears to be referencing an article titled Critics Aghast As Trump Keeps Word About No More Wars by the conservative columnist Kurt Schlichter. At no point does Trump or Schlichter claim that there was any reason why the Kurds should have been involved with Allied operations in Normandy in any significant numbers. – sempaiscuba Oct 10 at 12:07
  • 2
    @TypeIA - precisely - if you said that I'd wonder. If a politician said that, I would interpret it as a rhetorical device. I am not making a political statement when I say that it is not rational to apply the standards of historical scholarship to speech by political figures. Political speech is characterized by rhetorical devices, hyperbole and is intended to persuade/shape the discussion, not to educate or to provide factual information. The only reason to fact check a political statement is to advance a political agenda, which is why I'm suspicious of the question. – Mark C. Wallace Oct 10 at 12:16
  • 4
    Thank you for being understanding - I didn't mean to be disagreeable or unwelcoming, but I was anxious about crossing the line between politics and history. – Mark C. Wallace Oct 10 at 12:34
60

The Kurds had very little involvement in WWII and no capacity to take action as a group. At the time, just about all of them lived in the Kurdish areas of Turkey, Iran and Iraq. They had no self-determination, and those states acted as follows:

  • Turkey was neutral throughout WWII.
  • Iran was invaded and occupied jointly by the USSR and the British Empire in late summer 1941, to create a route for supplies to be sent to the USSR from India, and to secure control of the Iranian oil fields. The occupying powers withdrew after the end of the war, although the Soviets did not want to at first.
  • Iraq was under British influence. There was a coup by Iraqis sympathetic to Germany in spring 1941 and an attempt to expel British forces, but it failed. The British recruited local troops, about 25% of whom were Kurds, but they were under British control. As per the link:

By 1942, the Iraq Levies consisted of a Headquarters, a Depot, Specialist Assyrian companies, 40 service companies and the 1st Parachute Company, which consisted of 75% Assyrian and 25% Kurd. The new Iraq Levies Disciplinary Code was based largely on the Indian Army Act.

By 1943 the Iraq Levies strength stood at 166 British officers controlling 44 companies; 22 Assyrian, five Mixed Assyrian/Yizidi, ten Kurdish, four Marsh Arabs, and three Baluchi. Eleven Assyrian companies served in Palestine and another four served in Cyprus. The Parachute Company was attached to the Royal Marine Commando and were active in Albania, Italy and Greece. In 1943/1944 the Iraq Levies were renamed the Royal Air Force Levies.

So a platoon or so of Kurds, in the Parachute Company, served in Albania, Italy and Greece with the Royal Marine Commandos, but they weren't at Normandy. There is no sign of any Iraqi units in the order of battle for Gold, Juno or Sword beaches.

The Kurds, as a people or a political group, did not have an important role in WWII, and there was no significant Kurdish diaspora to influence events elsewhere.

Addendum: More information about the Iraq Levies here and here.

12

Just some additional information, from an Oct. 10 NYT Article
(apologies if there's a paywall)

... Did Kurds fight in World War II?

It is unclear whether any Kurds were at the Normandy landings, but there is evidence that some of them fought on the side of the Allied forces during World War II.

Some background: The Kurds, despite being the fourth-largest ethnic group in the Middle East, are a stateless and often marginalized people whose homeland stretches across Turkey, Syria, Iran, Iraq and Armenia. After World War I, the Allies’ negotiations with representatives of the defeated Ottoman Empire initially involved provisions for an autonomous Kurdistan. But that was abandoned by the ratification of the Treaty of Lausanne in 1923. Multiple attempts at greater autonomy or nationhood since then have been suppressed or quashed.

Some of the Kurds who had been pushed out of the Ottoman Empire and Turkey landed in the Soviet Union, said Mutlu Civiroglu, a Kurdish affairs analyst in Washington. So when World War II began, many fought with the Soviets on the side of the Allies. But they were difficult to track because they did not fight under a Kurdish flag.

“They didn’t have a country,” Mr. Civiroglu said. “They didn’t have a navy. They didn’t have anything on their own. But individually, many people came forward.”

Evidence of this has survived in folk songs and books that pay tributeto Kurds who fought in World War II, Mr. Civiroglu said. He also noted that Samand Aliyevich Siabandov — a member of the Yazidis, a Kurdish-speaking religious minority — was a well-known Soviet fighter who was lauded in the English-language Russian newspaper Moscow News in 1946.

protected by sempaiscuba Oct 13 at 6:16

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.