9

While perusing Wikipedia article on Gallipoli Campaign, I saw an intriguing statement:

an attempt by the British to bribe the Ottomans to join the Allied side ... failed.

Wikipedia citing an incorrect source: The First World War: To Arms. I by Hew Strachan, the correct source is (confusingly) The First World War by Hew Strachan:

The operational difficulties did not, however, invalidate the powerful attractions of the scheme in terms of grand strategy. ... Grey, the British foreign secretary, thought military action (Gallipoli Campaign) might provoke a coup d‘état in the Ottoman capital: given the instability of Turkish politics in the years preceding the war, as well as the divisions on the issue of entry to the war itself, this was hardly an unreasonable expectation. British intelligence offered a bribe of £4 million. Offering cash was not in itself misplaced: the Ottoman public debt was evidence of that. The real difficulty was that the Germans had just handed over £5 million.

I was unable to find the source of this from the book, or any other solid reference to this bribery attempt. The phrasing is very confusing, was the bribery attempt done during the campaign, or before? What was the target of bribery? Government? Specific people?

Also, is there any source for the German £5 million "grant money"?

  • 2
  • 2
    The Wikipedia citation looks very dubious. It cites Strachan p115, but that chapter is 'Socialism and the International' and there's no mention of Turkey / Ottomans on p115. The chapter concerning Turkey's entry starts on page 644. The pages that can be viewed support sepaiscuba's link, that there was an attempt to keep Turkey neutral / out of the war. Look inside Amazon here. – Lars Bosteen Oct 16 at 13:32
  • 1
    @LarsBosteen I had the same confusion with the table of contents, though if you look at The First World War titled book, which is confusingly a separate book by the same author, it does correspond to a correct chapter at p115, namely Jihad. Wiki might have the wrong book cited? – buræquete Oct 16 at 13:36
  • 1
    @buræquete Yes, it looks the wrong book has been cited. The bribe is mentioned on page 114 in the book you cited, but seems to be aimed at encouraging a coup. I think you could post an answer to this question with the source you found. – Lars Bosteen Oct 16 at 13:45
  • 1
    @LarsBosteen Better to try Strachan's book on Internet archive. The Telegraph article was just the first result that came up when I searched Google for the keywords British bribe Ottomans WW1. Other links returned by that search may give more detail. – sempaiscuba Oct 16 at 13:46
11

Short answer

Yes, there was an attempt to bribe the Ottomans but it was an attempt to keep them out of the war, rather than to change sides.

During WWI, the British offered, or considered offering, a number of bribes or inducements not only to the Ottomans / Turkey but also to Greece. The offer of (British) £4,000,000 to the Ottomans was not for them to join the Allies; it was to 'buy' Ottoman neutrality. It was actually Greece that Britain tried to bring to the Allied side, not Turkey. The main primary source for the above appears to be the diary of a senior British civil servant.

The £Turkish 5 million the Germans "handed over" was in fact a loan, the source for this apparently being a Berlin foreign office file. This initial sum turned out to be a fraction of the total amount the Germans eventually loaned the Ottomans (over £Turkish 180 million).

Note on currency values: according to Historicalstatistics.org (if I'm reading it right), 1 British pound in 1913 could buy approx 7.331 gram gold whereas 1 Ottoman lira could buy approx. 6.659 gram gold.


Details

- Britain and the Ottoman Empire, 1915

The bribery attempt referred to by Hew Strachan (2005) took place just after the Battle of Sarikamish (22nd Dec 1914 to 17th Jan 1915). The Gallipoli campaign, which began on 17th Feb 1915, ended any hopes of it succeeding when the landings began.

In January 1915, the Ottoman Army under Enver suffered a crushing defeat in the Caucasus against the Russians at the Battle of Sarikamish, from which it never fully recovered. Just after Sarikamish, the British made their first attempt to bribe the Turks into peace. Hankey suggested the idea to Captain (later Admiral) Reginald Hall, the Director of Naval Intelligence. The sources do not disclose under whose authority Hankey was acting, but Hall instructed Mansfield Cumming, the first Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service, to make the necessary arrangements. On his own authority, Hall proposed that up to £4,000,000 should be offered to the Turks. His chosen emissaries, Edwin Whittall and George Eady, had excellent contacts in Constantinople. Whittall told Cumming that the project was a ‘forlorn hope’ unless the Entente guaranteed that Constantinople would remain in Ottoman hands. He was right. In April 1915, Whittall and Eady negotiated with Turkish representatives, but the Gallipoli landings that month destroyed whatever prospect there might have been of achieving this ambitious goal.

Source: Joseph Maiolo & Tony Insall, 'Sir Basil Zaharoff and Sir Vincent Caillard as Instruments of British Policy towards Greece and the Ottoman Empire during the Asquith and Lloyd George Administrations, 1915–8'. In 'The International History Review, Volume 34, 2012 - Issue 4'

Maiolo & Insall's source for this is K. Jeffery, MI6: The History of the Secret Intelligence Service 1909–1949 (London, 2010). The sources given by Jeffrey are the Hankey diary (4 Mar 1915) and The Eyes of the Navy; a Biographical Study of Admiral Sir Reginald Hall, K. C. M. G. , C. B. , LL. D. , D.C.L by W. M. James. Curiously, although this attempted 'bribe' is mentioned in Strachan (2005), he does not mention it in his (more detailed) 2012 book (see link provided in sempaiscuba's comment).

Perhaps also worth noting is that in the same month (March) that the British were talking to the Ottomans, the Germans loaned a further £Turkish 4,346,093.


  • Britain and Greece, 1915

In late 1915, the British, having earlier turned their attention to bringing neutral Greece in on the side of the allies, sent £1,487,000 to the account of Basil Zaharoff (an arms dealer with a reputation that might politely be described as 'colourful') in order to 'facilitate' this change in their stance, but King Constantine I was pro-German and his opposition could not be overcome, even with other inducements.


  • Britain and the Ottoman Empire, 1916

The authors also refer to another £4,000,000 bribe which was 'considered' in May 1916. It's complicated, but - in short - several meetings took place through various intermediaries (Basil Zaharoff being a key figure again), this time at the instigation of the Ottomans

to discuss the possible defection of Enver and several dozen of his colleagues in the ruling Committee of Union and Progress (the Young Turks)...in March 1916

After various other meetings, Zaharoff met the Prime Minister, H. H. Asquith:

It is difficult to reconstruct what was said, but the evidence suggests that Asquith expressed interest in the idea. As he later told Hankey (who, in his diary noted that a bribe of £4,000,000 was considered), the scheme ‘seemed far-fetched and unlikely to come off, but as there was to be no pay until the goods were delivered, there seemed no objection to letting Zaharoff try’

However, this too fell through as the Turks lost interest, apparently because their military fortunes took a turn for the better. The primary sources for the above are the aforementioned Hankey diary and the papers at the Foreign Office of Sir Vincent Caillard, the financial director of the arms manufacturer Vickers. How much chance it had of succeeding in the first place is debatable given that the Germans had loaned a further £Turkish 32 million in treasury bonds in February.


  • Britain and the Ottoman Empire, 1917 & 1918

Further consideration was given to bribing Turkey out of the war in 1917 and 1918 (as mentioned in the link provided by sempaiscuba in his comment). These are detailed in Maiolo & Insall, who cite Hankey, Caillard and Lloyd George's papers as primary sources.


  • German loan to the Ottoman Empire, 1914

This loan was for £Turkish 5 million (the currency distinction between the British £ and the Turkish £ is not made clear in Strachan's 2005 book) - the latter was worth slightly less than the former in 1913 (data for 1914 is hard to come by). The terms of repayment were initially strict but were lessened considerably as an inducement for the Ottomans to enter the war. An initial deposit of £Turkish 2 million was made, with the balance due when Turkey entered the war. The source for this is Strachan's 2012 book; he cites Ulrich Trumpener's Germany and the Ottoman Empire, 1914-1918 which in turn cites the Berlin foreign office file Turkei 110 as the primary source.

In addition, the Germans had (in August) provided the Turkish navy with two ships (the cruiser Breslau and the battlecruiser Goeben) for a token sum. These were particularly welcome as the British had earlier (in July) cancelled the delivery of two dreadnoughts (they were requisitioned by the Royal Navy), a move which caused much anger in Turkey.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.