Why did France put so many resources into fighting Algeria in comparison to its other former colonial holdings? Was there anything unique about the French-Algerian relationship. On Wikipedia it says that France regarded Algeria in a way similar t how the USA think of Hawaii and Alaska. Is this true? If it is, why?
Why did France put so many resources into fighting Algeria in comparison to its other former colonial holdings?
3Algeria was the closest colony to France. Some French hoped of it ultimately becoming a part of France (as opposed to just a colony).– Luke_0Nov 11, 2012 at 0:59
Why I am downvoting this question– MCW ♦Jul 3, 2014 at 10:31
Algeria was more then a colony, there were French Départements in Algeria, from 1848 on until 1962 it was an integral part of the French motherland.
See Wikipedia or the french wikipedia article for the French départements in Algeria
This does not mean, that Algerians were full citizens.
See also Process of Colonization:
Algeria was formally declared to be a part of France and was again divided into three departments, the government of which was placed into the hands of European settlers.
The tension between the French and the Arabs started to grow. The French neglected the Arabs and in July of 1864, Senatus Consulte declared all Moslems to be French subjects, meaning the Muslims were not to be citizens. This way, the Arabs could keep their Muslim religion and the Koran law, and were subject to special police regulations, including the infamous code de l’indigenat. In order for Arabs to become full-blooded French citizens, they had to give up their personal status, which not many were willing to do.
To take the question further, could you comment on why France formally considered Algeria as its integral part, but not other colonies including Tunisia and Morocco? Nov 16, 2015 at 1:31
@user69715 You could make a new question and reference to this question. Some informations may be in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_Algeria– knutNov 16, 2015 at 8:13
No need any longer, there is the question in meantime: history.stackexchange.com/questions/26403/…– knutNov 16, 2015 at 11:23
Thanks. Actually, after commenting above I did some reading on the subject, so I went ahead and wrote an answer there: history.stackexchange.com/a/26409/4390 Nov 16, 2015 at 15:44
The other answers pointed out very correctly that Algiers was legally considered a part of France. What must be added is that there was a very large body of French colonists in Algiers, which was not the case with the other French possessions, whatever their legal status.
2+1 By far the most important point, I think. The colonists were even less prepared to let Algeria go than people in mainland France and were a significant political force.– RelaxedJul 9, 2014 at 1:10
Julian Jackson's account of France in the 1930s and 1940s France: The Dark Years shows how France's African empire was seen as compensation for the decline in French prestige and influence in Europe during this period.
Algeria was the most important element in this project because of proximity to France, long historical association, and larger settler population than elsewhere. Writing in 1938 Le Matin declared the keys to French security were the Vosges, Alps, Pyrenees and Atlas Mountains (my emphasis).
Le Matin also stated at this time:
France has two capitals: Paris and Algiers
It's hard to imagine an equivalent statement of imperial projection coming out of London or other European capitals.
Algeria was considered a "back door" to France, from the south. In the hands of a hostile country, England, Germany, or even Libya/Egypt, it was seen as a potential invasion route to France. On the other hand, if France retained a foothold in Africa through Algeria, it could continue to influence its former colonies in "French West Africa" (which it does to a small degree, to this day).
France looked at Algeria that way an American might see Latin America through the Monroe Doctrine: a "no fly" zone for hostile foreign countries. Algeria is the part of Africa that is closest to France.
4more reference please? Nov 12, 2012 at 2:44
There were multiple reasons why Algeria was so important to French:
Algeria was French military colony since 1834. and, by the constitution of 1848 to be an integral part of French territory and divided into three French departments (Algiers, Oran and Constantine). Also, as Tom said, Algeria was backdoor of France and it was very possible route to invade France.
French capitulation in WW2 was already great hit to French honor, but when France lost in First Indochina war France was totally defiled. France could not allow to lose in another war because that could cause big political and military crisis in France.
In Algeria, there were more French population (about 800,000) then in other overseas territories and colonies and their destiny would be very critical if they lost that war.
2All correct except the backdoor - I don't think that could have been a factor at the post WWII era. Jun 2, 2014 at 15:01
2I don't think point 2 explains anything. Indochina was that war and it was lost. France did not even fight the independence of most of its African colonies. The question is why did it even start a war in Algeria?– RelaxedJul 9, 2014 at 1:05