I have read many sources stating that Lincoln refused an offer for war elephants during the Civil War. I have also read that this was not true. I was hoping that this site could shed some light on the truth. So did the King of Siam truly offer war elephants to the Union during the Civil War?

  • 17
    Which sources have you already read? Including the details will prevent people giving you information you're already aware of.
    – Steve Bird
    Jan 8, 2020 at 18:06
  • fascinating thought - what if the elephants from the Ringling Brothers circus that are on animal free range enclosures in Florida are let loose in the US National Parks?
    – likejudo
    Jan 11, 2020 at 14:58

2 Answers 2


Yes and No.

What appears to be true is that the King of Siam did send a letter offering a herd of elephants to the US President in 1861.

According to the US National Archives

King Mongkut said that he had heard that the United States had no elephants. As a remedy, he offered a gift of elephants—several pairs of them—that could be "turned loose in forests and increase till there be large herds." The elephants would be useful in the unsettled parts of the United States, he continued, "since elephants being animals of great size and strength can bear burdens and travel through uncleared woods and matted jungles where no carriage and cart roads have yet been made."

The letter was mistakenly addressed to Lincoln's predecessor James Buchanan and makes no mention of war elephants.

Lincoln responded in 1862 declining the offer:

Great and Good Friend: I have received Your Majesty's two letters of the date of February 14th., 1861. I appreciate most highly Your Majesty's tender of…a stock from which a supply of elephants might be raised on our own soil. This Government would not hesitate to avail itself of so generous an offer if the object were one which could be made practically useful in the present condition of the United States. Our political jurisdiction, however, does not reach a latitude so low as to favour the multiplication of the elephant, and steam…has been our best and most efficient agent of transportation in internal commerce.

Conclusion: Yes, the King of Siam did offer elephants to the US during the Civil War. No, they were not offered to aid in the war effort but rather to be beasts of burden in unpopulated areas of the country.

  • 8
    I thought this was just a bit of throw away dialog in the musical movie "The King and I". Jan 9, 2020 at 17:17
  • 5
    @MichaelRichardson ". . . since elephants being animals of great size and strength can bear burdens and travel through uncleared woods and matted jungles and serve as great mounts in war, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera"
    – RobertF
    Jan 9, 2020 at 22:03

Wikipedia gives a summary of this event:

Contrary to popular belief, King Mongkut did not offer a herd of war elephants to the US president Abraham Lincoln during the American Civil War for use against the Confederacy. He did, however, offer to send some domesticated elephants to US president James Buchanan, to use as beasts of burden and means of transportation. The royal letter of 14 February 1861, which was written even before the Civil War started, took some time to arrive in Washington DC, and by the time it reached its destination, President Buchanan was no longer in office. (Text of the royal letter here.) Lincoln, who succeeded Buchanan, is said to have been asked what the elephants could be used for, and in reply he said that he did not know, unless "they were used to stamp out the rebellion." However, in his reply dated 3 February 1862, Lincoln did not mention anything about the Civil War. The President merely politely declined to accept King Mongkut's proposal, explaining to the King that the American climate might not be suitable for elephants and that American steam engines could also be used as beasts of burden and means of transportation.

Elephants had long ceased to be useful in warfare by 1862 in any case:

With the advent of gunpowder warfare in the late 15th century, the balance of advantage for war elephants on the battlefield began to change. While muskets had limited impact on elephants, which could withstand numerous volleys, cannon fire was a different matter entirely—an animal could easily be knocked down by a single shot. With elephants still being used to carry commanders on the battlefield, they became even more tempting targets for enemy artillery.

tl; dr: King Mongkut didn't offer war elephants, he offered domesticated elephants. He did this before the American Civil War started (which was also why the letter was addressed to James Buchanan). Lincoln declined, preferring to rely on steam engines, and would not have been able to use war elephants effectively anyway.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.