Several Catholic orders operated missions in colonial Mexico; Dominicans, Franciscans, and Jesuits (before their expulsion) all had their own strategies. Alejandro Murguía in The Medicine of Memory differentiates them thus (the bolding is mine):

The Jesuits are teachers and scholars; the Franciscans, missionaries and colonizers. Whereas the Jesuits oppose enslavement of the Indians, the Franciscans are enemies of the flesh and firm believers in punishment.

Is this claim true? Jesuits in South America used indigenous labor that is easily compared to enslavement, just as the Franciscans did in the California missions (both examples of reducción). Were local conditions different and Murguía correct, or did Jesuit missions in New Spain also coerce native labor?

  • 1
    I read this and am more confused than ever: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_American_name_controversy – AllInOne Feb 11 '20 at 17:37
  • 1
    I think that in order to get a reasonable answer, you need to be more specific about what is meant by "coerce"? There's a broad range between "tithe to the church or you'll go to Hell" and outright enslavement. And of course the Church was certainly using variations on the first in Europe... – jamesqf Apr 4 '20 at 18:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.