Through history what role did Washington, DC play to become important and influence the US political system, and did it change its influence with time?

  • 1
    I've tried to clean up your question, let me know if this is what you are asking. It's an easy answer but I'd like to be sure of the question first.
    – MichaelF
    Commented Dec 6, 2012 at 13:09
  • the edit is ok .
    – md nth
    Commented Dec 6, 2012 at 13:17
  • 1
    I'm not sure what you mean when you say that DC "dominates" politics in the USA. (Partly the scarequotes confuse me, partly I'm not sure if you're asking why the nation's capital is the center of the nation's government.)
    – MCW
    Commented Dec 6, 2012 at 13:59
  • i dont mean its symbolic importance but its actions in the political system in USA
    – md nth
    Commented Dec 7, 2012 at 4:13
  • 2
    @mdnth Well then, you're barking up the wrong tree. The country at large pays very little attention to D.C. itself (very different from London or Seoul, for instance), and the mayor and city council of DC have very little power or influence— they are always at the mercy of Congress, in which they do not have a seat, and because the District is so overwhelmingly Democratic, it is ignored by both parties for presidential elections.
    – choster
    Commented Dec 7, 2012 at 22:48

2 Answers 2


Washington DC was basically "made" the capital after Philadelphia after an insurrection by Revolutionary War soldiers called the Pennsylvania Mutiny of 1783. The mutiny showed that state governments could not protect federal institutions so there began a search to move the capital where it could be defended by the Federal government. There was a power struggle between what would be the "Southern" states and the "North" to move the capital somewhere symbolic, and to some in an area they could influence. As part of a deal negotiated by Alexander Hamiliton:

The selection of the area around the Potomac River, which was the boundary between Maryland and Virginia, both slave states, was agreed upon between James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, and Alexander Hamilton. Hamilton had a proposal for the new federal government to take over debts accrued by the states during the Revolutionary War. However, by 1790, Southern states had largely repaid their overseas debts. Hamilton's proposal would require Southern states to assume a share of Northern debt. Jefferson and Madison agreed to this proposal and in return secured a Southern location for the federal capital

This was after a fight to get the capital either in Philadelphia or New York City, and it was set to move from time to time as part of a deal with the Continental Congress. Yet in Federalist number 43 Madison argues that the capital needs to be on its own land, which eventually won out. Its often been said the city is built on swampland that no one really wanted, and think of the symbolism of that all you want.

It was made to be the capital so it naturally became the power center and dominated US politics by its nature and creation. It's influence has basically been retained over time, though even the Federalists and Anti-Federalists have fought over governments power and reach the capital has been and continues to be the center of politics as it maintains the Federal Bueracracy and Cabinet offices, as well as very close by the Pentagon which is the military headquarters of the US military branches.

Note: I may clean this up later but this should give you an idea of the background.

Other Sources: Founding of Washington DC Wikipedia's Version


@MichaelF's answer is a very solid explanation of the origin of DC, and references a historical event that I think deserves more attention. His answer is also far better researched and referenced than I will be able to provide. Having said that, I think the answer to the OP's question ought to include a discussion of the changing role of the national government in US Politics.

  • One of the outcomes of the Civil War was a dramatically rearchitectured Federal system with much more power invested in national politics.
  • FDR's massive restructuring of the US government in response to the
    depression required the creation of a much larger bureaucracy. (one could argue that the bureaucracy was also driven by the income tax, the rise of the welfare state, and by the demands of WWII. Legitimate arguments, but for simplicity, I'll blame FDR)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.