4

My general perception of the 1960s in the USA, and possibly also the late 1950s, other than "drugs and hippies", is that the youth constantly was driving around in their cars, racing, daring and egging each other on to do all kinds of dangerous stunts, often resulting in deaths.

I've got this perception from movies, songs and TV series. And probably many other sources as well.

Was this actually a thing? Did teenagers and early 20s people really have this as a whole "youth culture" thing? Or was it purely made up for fiction, and they just liked that "image" and went to see such movies?

It seems like there could be at least some truth to this, but I'm curious to why this exactly would happen in the 1960s and late 1950s but not before or after that. What was so special about that era?

  • 7
    Welcome to History:SE. What has your research shown you so far? Where have you already searched? What did you find? Please help us to help you. You might find it helpful to review the site tour and Help Centre and, in particular, How to Ask. – sempaiscuba Jun 7 at 1:01
  • 3
    I like the premise of this question. However, "to this extent" cannot be quantified without us all watching the same movies, etc. It would be better if you named some of them, but also then brought out specific instances of "reckless driving". Meanwhile, I would link you to raggare which kind of discusses this topic (though not exactly). – gktscrk Jun 7 at 12:15
  • You have to remember that movies &c exaggerate things, so that "constantly" is just for dramatic effect. But if you grew up in a rural or suburban area, you did drive around a lot with your friends on weekend nights. While some of that driving was reckless by today's standards, the standards of those days were different. For instance, back then most cars didn't even have seat belts. – jamesqf Jun 7 at 17:42
5

I think that this is quite a pertinent and interesting question. Depending on one's location, Americans may seem to have a 'natural' predisposition towards cars and using them. However, this obviously reflects something in how that country developed and what choices it made.

In short, the re-alignment of the post-war economy with the war-time repressed demand for automobiles, combined with the post-war spending on road improvements caused the car to become ubiquitous in American society. This also trickled down to the teenagers who 'had' to have a car.


War-Time Restrictions

Firstly, what should be understood is that cars were a relatively novel thing in the early part of the 20th century. The popularization of the automobile started to progress with the advent of the affordable car as built by Henry Ford. The importance of Henry Ford and his processes—even if the Model T is perhaps overemphasised in this context—cannot be understated. Ford made it possible for the average working person to own a car; Chrysler and other companies followed. The Second World War was a small step backwards in this process:

Within two months of the Dec. 7, 1941, bombing of Pearl Harbor, the last civilian cars rolled off the assembly lines, and auto plants were frantically converting to military-only production of arms, munitions, trucks, tanks and planes. By December 1942, Detroit had become the "Arsenal of Democracy" and didn't resume civilian production of automobiles until the war ended in 1945.
—Snyder, 'No new cars, but that didn't stop U.S. automakers, dealers during WWII'


Post-War Car Demand

Similarly, car sales were restricted during the World War. However, as the Japanese surrender approached, these restrictions were loosened. This was important to both the home front people who had been wanting to buy cars throughout the war, but also the returning servicemen. At the same time, many cars sold in the immediate post-war years were the same models as on offer in 1941/42. Yet, quotas on car production were originally still in effect to conserve steel:

Up to the close of 1944, 3,451,320 passenger cars had been junked; about twice that number would have been taken off the road if they had been replaceable. The pent-up demand is variously estimated at from five to nine million new cars for the first three to five postwar years. ...

During the first three months of 1946, the industry would be permitted to produce 449,102 units. Krug said the authorized production might total 2,000,000 new cars by July 1, 1946. The purpose of the quota system was to ensure that the industry would use no more than a reasonable amount of the steel available for production of war and civilian goods. The sharp drop in military requirements after the surrender of Japan removed this factor from consideration and ceilings were lifted altogether.
—CQ Researcher, 'Automobiles in the Postwar Economy'

All this demand meant that cars were going to be bought when available. This lead to a fairly considerable car-penetration in the society throughout the post-war years but the demand was still high:

...car sales reached over 2.1 million, a figure that was slightly less than the Depression-year output of 1934. Demand was very high, but supply did not match this demand for several years even though car sales reached 5.1 million in 1949. There was a slight dip in output during the Korean War, but otherwise production continued upwards, reaching 7.9 million in 1955. By then 52.1 million cars were registered, a huge increase over the 25.8 million of the last year of the war, 1945. A decade later in 1965, car manufacturers sold 9.3 million cars and there were 75.3 million cars registered.
—Walsh, 'Gender and the Automobile in the United States'

At the same time, road network improvements were an easy way to continue mass employment while improving logistical capacity that was clearly going to be appreciated by the populace. This meant that owning a car became an imperative:

To be without a car in the United States was, except in the heart of large Eastern or Midwestern cities where a viable public transit system remained operative, to be almost in exile.
—Walsh, 'Gender and the Automobile in the United States'


Teenage Hot-Rodders & Greasers

This trickled down to the younger people as well:

Two other notable features of the mass spread of the car culture of the 1950s and 1960s were teenagers on the road and family vacations, and the overlapping dependence on roadside facilities used by both groups.

Teenagers were publicly recognized as a growing phenomenon in the 1950s and 1960s. The offspring of the parents who had married young during the war or immediately thereafter, these “baby boomers” forged their own lifestyle, a proportion of which was centred on access to the car that could give them freedom. Having wheels meant escape from prying eyes, gaining “street cred[ibility]” among high-school or college peers, and access to the local automobile culture. Gaining a driver’s licence was, as Kenneth Jackson suggests, the most important rite of passage in the high-school experience. While the majority of teenagers who inherited and customized “hand-me-down jalopies” were young males, young females were by no means debarred from teenage automobility. Indeed, they were central to this style of youth culture. Part of teenage driving was to impress other male students about knowledge of and intimacy with car technology, but another part was to be seen cruising with a popular girl, often enjoying the new rock and roll music to the annoyance of the older generation.
—Walsh, 'Gender and the Automobile in the United States'

This in turn let to the rise of hod-rodding (amongst the greasers which became a label for the sub-culture) and drag racing:

With their new found independence and parental indulgence combined many teenagers drove fancy Hot Rods. The teenager culture was enamored with the freedom a car provided. You could drive where you want, and most of the time as fast as you wanted. Some car enthusiasts would have races that became known as drag races “a preview of Saturday Night Drag Race over the loudspeakers at the Paradise Mesa Drag Strip in San Diego”.
'Teenager Popular Culture - United States 1950s'

The following excerpt specifies the greasers as lacking opportunities but still having (tuned) cars:

Lower- and working-class families still felt the lack of economic opportunity. Minority groups such as Italian-American and Hispanic-American citizens encountered many roadblocks to prosperity during an otherwise booming period in America. Disillusioned by the lack of opportunity in post-war America, many of these people became drawn to counterculture elements like fast cars and rock and roll music. ... the greaser subculture was born. ...

Greasers were often perceived to have an extensive mechanical knowledge. With the greasers’ love of fast cars and rebellion, the hot rod was the perfect car to associate with this subculture. Racing custom-built cars became a popular pastime.

Combined with the increased prosperity and growth of suburban households, car ownership spiked. For the greaser of the 1950s, that meant owning a hot rod. A hot rod is generally considered to be a car that has been modified in an effort to produce more power and speed. ... the foundation of the National Hot Rod Association in 1951 increased the appeal for a custom-built speed machine. The mechanical knowledge of the average greaser put them at an advantage when it came to hot rods and racing their machines.
'Greasers and Hot Rods'


Similar Sub-Cultures

The raggare in Sweden, bōsōzoku in Japan, and rockers in the United Kingdom followed some (or all) of these trends as well.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    I should emphasise perhaps that I've not tried to answer "whether the teenagers drove recklessly to this extent" because the question is unquantifiable as it stands; I have tried to describe why the teenagers moved to cars, however, and why the culture reflects that. – gktscrk Jun 7 at 13:25
2

Since this touches on something that affects all countries, I'm going to answer it with statistics from another country: Reported Road Casualties UK.

You can see that last year, 1800 people died in traffic accidents in the UK last year. The number has been falling steadily since 1980. Before then in the years provided, the number was never lower than 4000, and in some years was higher than 7000.

These numbers are striking. In absolute terms, more people were killed on the road in 1926 than they are today! There were fewer people, and far fewer cars.

There are lots of reasons why. Cars themselves were more dangerous - no seatbelts, airbags, or crumple zones. Roads were narrower and more dangerous. But also, yes, the driving culture has changed. Drink driving is illegal and severely punished. There are speed cameras. And the driving test is far more difficult. All the applies to the USA and all postindustrial countries.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    That last dip in 2009 was an unintended consequence of some totally different government policy if I remember right. Citymetrics (I think it was them) described that dip and how the situation had progressed since. At the same time, I also remember ads from Britain where "People thought driving at 50mph" would kill them because 'no one' had done it previously -- maybe it was an ad for A1, I can't really remember, but it does kind of miss the emphasis of the OP's interest. – gktscrk Jun 7 at 12:18
2

America has historically been a young people oriented society that celebrated a youth culture. This youth culture has taken different turns at various times, depending on its intersection with whatever else was going on in American society at the time.

The book "Generations, by William Strauss and Neil Howe explains that the teenagers of the 1950s and what I call the "post 1950s" (up to about 1965), were members of the so-called Silent Generation.

The Silent Generation was a relatively small generation, conceived (mostly) in the "baby bust" of the 1930s and early 1940s, sandwiched between two larger and more powerful generations, the World War II generation (before them), and the Baby Boom generation (after).

Born (mostly) in the 1910s and early 1920s, the World War II generation had a natural outlet for their youthful energies, in winning World War II, and later, in winning the post-war prosperity. Before that, they had been largely harnessed by the government make work programs such as the Works Progress Administration and Civilian Conservation Corps.

The later born Baby Boomers started a "consciousness revolution" with the drugs and hippie culture that rocked American (and global) society to its foundations. They were the result of a "generation gap" between parents born well before World War II, and children born after the war (rather than during or shortly before it), that resulted in youth-elder misunderstanding and alienation.

Unlike the two generations on either side of them, the Silent generation was "youthful" during relatively "trivial" times of the post World World War II peace and prosperity. (No World War II or Vietnam War.) It was this peace and prosperity that made cars widely available for "reckless driving." Hence their youthful energies found a natural outlet in this direction. On the whole, the 1950s teen culture featured a mix of World War II generation conformity and Boom generation rebellion (and moderate doses of both). They did things that were moderately dangerous to themselves, but not "earthshaking" to the rest of American society. The prevailing ethos was best represented in the movie, "Rebel Without a Cause."

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.