From what I know, the Greeks and Romans held men with large penises in contempt as in their eyes; they allegedly couldn't control their sexual urges while men with smaller ones where approved because they embodied the Greco-Roman concepts of virility and masculinity. I'm curious to know what both cultures thought of big-breasted women, although I have the sneaking suspicion that they would have served as targets of mockery. Do any written sources state or somehow imply their views on such a topic, if such texts even exist?

  • 2
    Welcome to History:Stack Exchange. Thank you for your question; please consider revising it to be more in line with our community expectations. Like many other stacks, we expect questions to provide evidence of prior research. That helps us to understand the question, and avoids our repeating work you've already done. Our help center, and other stacks provide additional resources to assist with revisions. – Mark C. Wallace Jul 10 '20 at 11:28
  • 5
    Wikipedia's Women in ancient Rome answers this and provides primary sources which you can check. – Lars Bosteen Jul 10 '20 at 12:36

From the article "Roman Beauty Culture" (Wilner, 1931):

[T]he type preferred for the young woman was the tall, stately build which Catullus (Carm. LxxxVI) admits Quintia possesses and which the lover in Terence's Eunuchus (vss. 313-16) contrasts favorably with "our girls, whom their mothers want slope-shouldered, with bound breasts, to make them slender. If one is a little too well-conditioned, they call her a prize-fighter and reduce her rations."

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.