26

The US Constitution says the Vice President of the United States may only vote in the Senate to break a tie.

The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.

The Constitution of the United States, Article 1, Section 3

Vice Presidents have used that power to confirm appointments and vote in favor of bills that the President wants. The Vice President is the only officer of the U.S. government with both an executive and legislative role. As somebody who is elected along with the President, it would seem unthinkable for a Vice President to vote against his (maybe soon someday, her) own administration.

Has any Vice President voted against a bill or nomination favored by the President?

Some situations where this might have occurred was early in U.S. history when the Vice President and President were occasionally members of different parties or political rivals. Vice President Thomas Jefferson was a rival of and member of a different party than President Adams. The other occurrence was when John C. Calhoun was Vice President and John Quincy Adams was President. Both were members of the Democratic-Republican Party, but that was the sole major political party at the time, and each man was part of a different faction within that party.

Jefferson voted 3 times to break ties in the Senate and Calhoun voted 31 times. Did either of them vote against the administration? (At that time, the Vice President was not as integrated into the administration as it is now.)

There's also the possibility, albeit unlikely, that some Vice President voted against the administration despite being a member of the same party as the President.

27

You mentioned Calhoun - it seems he definitely did cast two tie-breaking votes (on the same subject, but separate occasions) against the wishes of the President. This was on Andrew Jackson's nomination of Martin Van Buren as ambassador to the UK; it seems to have been quite a complicated intraparty struggle, with Calhoun trying to prevent Van Buren becoming Jackson's successor.

Twice, however, in the hands of Vice-President Calhoun the casting ballot served effectively as a weapon against President Jackson, for Callhoun was able first (January 13, 1832) to halt the nomination of Martin Van Buren as minister to England and finally (January 25) to defeat it. The incidents of these votes were of peculiar interest inasmuch as Van Buren was at the time in London acting as our minister on a recess commission, and his rejection helped to make him Vice-President. Moreover it is altogether probable that Calhoun's partizans in the Senate provided him with the opportunity which he sought thus to assert his spite against Jackson.

(WP clarifies that last comment - enough of Calhoun's faction abstained to make it into a tie, which he was then able to break. So it seems to have been a bit of a manufactured situation.)

None of the other cases mentioned by Learned are explicitly described as against Presidential policy, and I'm not familiar enough with the political nuance to say for sure either way. It also doesn't cover any cases since 1915 (obviously). So I can't say for sure Calhoun was the only one, but it seems quite possible.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.