Zipf was a professor of German at Harvard. he is credited with inventing the rank size rules that suggested that of we rank many different sets of objects from big to small, they follow a power law. The law has very wide applicability to how cities, incomes, words in a language and so on are distributed. Zipf is sometimes considered to have been a Nazi sympathisers. It isn't clear - there was a post on this list by user 8320 about this - I would like to find out authentication of this and any other sources about Zipf and his life.

  • 2
    Welcome to History.SE [USERNAME]! Could you edit your question to clarify where you've searched and what you found already, complete with links and references, and context if applicable? In particular, please let us know what you find missing or unclear about the Wikipedia entry on the topic, if one exists. This allows those who might want to answer to do so without needing to redo the work you've already done. You might find it helpful to review the site tour and help center and, in particular, How to Ask.
    – MCW
    Sep 15 '20 at 16:09
  • 2
    "sometimes considered" - do you have any citations for this? Who considers him? Crackpots? Credible researchers? Leftist newspapers? Far right pundits? History is about sources; discussing history without discussing sources is like doing physics without units.
    – MCW
    Sep 15 '20 at 16:13
  • 5
    The site expects every question to be supported by preliminary research. Asking a question here is a request that people do labor/research on your behalf; common courtesy suggests that you provide all the information you have so that the research done on your behalf is not wasted.
    – MCW
    Sep 15 '20 at 16:30
  • 1
    Thanks this is interesting and useful. In fact I know the author John Miron of this book but haven't seen him for many years. To Mark, no offence taken.
    – MikeB
    Sep 15 '20 at 17:00
  • 2
    I was under the (mistaken?) opinion that resource requests were/are considered off-topic? Nope, I am right.
    – CGCampbell
    Sep 16 '20 at 15:33

Concerning the connection between George Kingsley Zipf and the Nazis, a couple of modern works give us some indication of the source of these concerns. The connection seems to mainly be from Zipf's 1941 publication, National Unity and Disunity; The Nation as a Bio-Social Organism.

The 2017 book The Organization of Cities: Initiative, ordinary life, and the good life by John R Miron, has a section discussing Zipf on page xxvi of the preface. In a footnote (45) he discusses a particularly controversial section of Zipf's earlier work.

In a particularly suspect agrument, Zipf (1941,p.197) presents the combined city size distribution for greater Austria-Germany-Sudetenland in a way that appears to justify the Nazi policy of Lebensraum in the lead up to World War II.

This connection can also be noted in a review of the book published in The American Political Science Review, vol 35, Issue 6 December 1941 pp 1178-1179.

...and that Germany suffered disastrously from the Versailles Treaty, but that, as a result of her acquisitions in Austria, Czechoslovakia, and Poland, she has been approaching normality.

Another book can also be found discussing Zipf's application of his power law to social situation in 1941 Europe. Psychomythics: Sources of Artifacts and Misconceptions in Scientific Psychology, by William R. Uttal. This book, in a footnote on page 51 seems to be referencing the same thing:

It does not require too much reading of Zipf's last chapter to appreciate both his explicit anti-Semitism and his pro-Nazi outlook. Particularly dangerous was his justification of Germany's aggression in terms of his empirical law.

Since a readable copy of this work has come up (Thanks @Sempaiscuba), I can include some direct information from the source (emphasis mine):

National Unity And Disunity by Zuof, George Kingsley

if we view the Treaty of Versailles as the disease, then we might view Mussolini and Hitler as cures on the one hand which may in turn become diseases on the other, which may in turn elicit cures elsewhere and so on indefinitely.

This is from the very first use of the name Hitler within the book, pg. 151. This disease-cure analogy is carried on later in the book (since Zipf's law is also applied to linguistics it might be worth noting that the word cure comes up 51 times in this book...):

It is a fair question to ask today whether the European war of September, 1939, should be viewed primarily as a disease or as a cure of diseased con-ditions, and whether Mr. Hitler is primarily a source of infection or a symptom of an infection, — a symptom that will pass as the infection of disequilibrium recedes.

(emphasis mine). This 'disequilibrium' is shown in his chart on page 197 where he shows the effect of Lebensraum, comparing the curve representing city population dynamics before and after May of 1939. enter image description here

The paragraph before this chart states the following (emphasis mine):

In view of the marked differences between 1934 and 1939, we cannot but conclude that somehow, during this interval, the assumed social-economic forces involved in this total situation suddenly moved towards greater social-economic equilibrium.

Ok. One more. (sorry for the multiple edits) From page 369 (of course emphasis is mine):

It may well be that anti-Semitism is in the order of a “cure” rather than of a “disease”; that is, in the order of a reaction instead of an action

  • 1
    You quote somewhat vague opinions judging that person. That is quite indirect. Can you move closer to the source and quote Zipf himself to show how much such evaluations are justified? (Without having looked into this: eg, it appears that he might have used "people without space" principle to describe Germany with those city sizes? Things like that'd be 'a hit'.) Sep 16 '20 at 14:05
  • 1
    @LаngLаngС I'm kinda busy with other stuff right now, but - for example - National Unity And Disunity (1941) is available to read/download on archive.org Sep 16 '20 at 17:32
  • 1
    @sempaiscuba Dang! I searched for Zipf and didn't find this book by "Zuof" ;) Thx Sep 16 '20 at 17:43
  • 1
    @LаngLаngС I find it's generally better to search for the title if possible. There appear to be just too many ways for people adding books to get the author field wrong when they upload (in addition to simple typos, I've seen quite a few where the "author" is given as the individual or institution who uploaded the book). Sep 16 '20 at 17:46
  • Sorry, been away. I also couldn't find a copy of the original, but (thanks to @sempaiscuba) I'll see what can be done. I think the answer, however, addresses where some of these 'modern allegations' come from. The user addressed the fact that he had read the source book and although the National Unity Disunity book is suggestive it is not definitive so it appeared to be necessary to bring other, professional opinions into the fray.
    – justCal
    Sep 16 '20 at 18:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.